General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums'Hunger, desperation, and destruction': UN team on northern Gaza
Samer AbdelJaber, the head of the World Food Program (WFP) in Palestine, has recounted a UN mission to provide food to Al-Ahli Hospital and surrounding areas.
AbdelJaber said that while being able to deliver food to the hospital in Gaza City was a promising step, the UN team saw hunger, desperation, and destruction.
The [UN] team recounted painful stories from the people who havent received any aid in weeks, he said.
Central and northern Gaza, including Gaza City, the largest city in the Gaza Strip, have been largely cut off from humanitarian aid since Israel claimed it cut the Gaza Strip in two in early November.
Samer AbdelJaber
@SamerWFP
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2023/11/25/israel-hamas-war-live-israeli-officials-say-39-palestinians
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
LexVegas
(6,261 posts)msongs
(68,470 posts)lapucelle
(19,251 posts)lapucelle
(19,251 posts)https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2023/11/25/israel-hamas-war-live-israeli-officials-say-39-palestinians
Think. Again.
(12,564 posts)...just as bad as 'hostage', no? I mean if there is a major difference in the semantics, I really don't see it.
lapucelle
(19,251 posts): taken and held as or as if a prisoner of war
: a person taken by force to secure the taker's demands
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/
Glad I could clear that up for you!
![](/emoticons/donut.gif)
Think. Again.
(12,564 posts)...so it seems ''captive" is a more correct word, seeing that hamas didn't take them to use in making any demands. Taking them 'captive', as if prisoners of war during a terrorist massacre, is in my opinion, even worse.
But really, I think this is all trivial in the face of how horrific this entire thing is.
lapucelle
(19,251 posts)![](https://i.postimg.cc/wB8jHqKt/face-palm-small.png)
![](/emoticons/donut.gif)
Think. Again.
(12,564 posts)yagotme
(3,513 posts)Think. Again.
(12,564 posts)....states:
captive: taken and held as or as if a prisoner of war.
My response was appropriate to that definition.
TexasDem69
(2,317 posts)From their homes to use as bargaining chips? Why do you think they seized these civilians then?
Think. Again.
(12,564 posts)Last edited Mon Nov 27, 2023, 03:41 AM - Edit history (1)
Considering that hamas has not made any 'demands' in which these people would be "used as bargaining chips", I don't see how the rigid definition of 'hostage' that lapucelle supplied in post #6 applies.
Of course, perhaps hamas had indeed planned to make some sort of demands for less violence in the West Bank or something (but I don't think hamas has ever been concerned with the well-being of Palestinian civilians), but they have given no indication that the intention of taking the Israeli civilians was as hostages to bargain with, so that leaves me no other explaination except that they were taken captive as if prisoners of war.
yagotme
(3,513 posts)Think. Again.
(12,564 posts)...I would agree with you, do we know if that's the case?
yagotme
(3,513 posts)Doesn't specifically say that Hamas asked for that ratio, but prior exchanges have usually been in the terrorists favor.
Think. Again.
(12,564 posts)...from that account, it seems that both sides were reluctant to do any kind of deal and that it was really the Biden team that got it all together.
yagotme
(3,513 posts)pinkstarburst
(1,437 posts)A 3 year old toddler girl is not a POW. These are hostages, taken by brutal terrorist savages. That you want to play word games and try to soften or justify the actions of these animals is disgusting. There is no justifications. Every person involved in October 7th should be found and executed.
Think. Again.
(12,564 posts)I did not start these word games, I responded to another that did.
I do not believe the words used are any more or less damning than each other.
I have posted numerous times that I believe no justification is needed for taking out hamas entirely and permanently.
Eko
(7,907 posts)is pretty wild.
Donkees
(31,727 posts)Donkees
(31,727 posts)2m ago (17:40 GMT)
Update: Red Crescent manages to deliver aid to north Gaza
The Red Crescent says 40 trucks with humanitarian aid were able to enter Gaza City and the northern areas through the Israeli checkpoint that dissects the besieged coastal enclave.
Earlier, we reported the PRCS saying that it was not able to send aid to the north of the Strip. (10:30 AM)
Bonx
(2,115 posts)Think. Again.
(12,564 posts)...since they took office, and Gazans do not agree with it;
"The argument that the entire population of Gaza can be held responsible for Hamass actions is quickly discredited when one looks at the facts. Arab Barometer, a research network where we serve as co-principal investigators, conducted a survey in Gaza and the West Bank days before the Israel-Hamas war broke out. The findings, published here for the first time, reveal that rather than supporting Hamas, the vast majority of Gazans have been frustrated with the armed groups ineffective governance as they endure extreme economic hardship. Most Gazans do not align themselves with Hamass ideology, either. Unlike Hamas, whose goal is to destroy the Israeli state, the majority of survey respondents favored a two-state solution with an independent Palestine and Israel existing side by side.
(Full article: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/israel/what-palestinians-really-think-hamas )
David__77
(23,831 posts)Donkees
(31,727 posts)LiberaBlueDem
(1,071 posts)And let the aid flow into Gaza