General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFacebook approved Israeli ad calling assassination
After the ad was discovered, digital rights advocates ran an experiment testing the limits of Facebooks machine-learning moderation.
[link:https://theintercept.com/2023/11/21/facebook-ad-israel-palestine-violence/|]
A series of advertisements dehumanizing and calling for violence against Palestinians, intended to test Facebooks content moderation standards, were all approved by the social network, according to materials shared with The Intercept.
The submitted ads, in both Hebrew and Arabic, included flagrant violations of policies for Facebook and its parent company Meta. Some contained violent content directly calling for the murder of Palestinian civilians, like ads demanding a holocaust for the Palestinians and to wipe out Gazan women and children and the elderly. Other posts, like those describing kids from Gaza as future terrorists and a reference to Arab pigs, contained dehumanizing language.
The approval of these ads is just the latest in a series of Metas failures towards the Palestinian people, Nadim Nashif, founder of the Palestinian social media research and advocacy group 7amleh, which submitted the test ads, told The Intercept. Throughout this crisis, we have seen a continued pattern of Metas clear bias and discrimination against Palestinians.
7amlehs idea to test Facebooks machine-learning censorship apparatus arose last month, when Nashif discovered an ad on his Facebook feed explicitly calling for the assassination of American activist Paul Larudee, a co-founder of the Free Gaza Movement. Facebooks automatic translation of the text ad read: Its time to assassinate Paul Larudi [sic], the anti-Semitic and human rights terrorist from the United States. Nashif reported the ad to Facebook, and it was taken down.
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
mymomwasright
(321 posts)not Isreal
DavidDvorkin
(19,641 posts)So it's not that it's anti-Palestinian. It could just be that its software is crappy.
marble falls
(59,609 posts)ProfessorGAC
(66,955 posts)...I'm choosing "B".
They just don't care. They develop a bot for content moderation to pretend their taking it seriously. That tye bot is ineffective is irrelevant to them.
marble falls
(59,609 posts)... to provide the public service of being a clearing house for truth or fact. They do not want to enforce rules, they just want to keep the peace just enough to keep it from interfering with the income stream and not bring in any authorities.
Argument and hair-pulls and controversy usually increase their active audience numbers.
orthoclad
(3,173 posts)Zuckbook can be as precise as it wants to, like when they helped throw the electoral college to Trump through micro-targeted ads in collaboration with Cambridge Analytica, but unless it suits zuck's political preferences, they don't care enough to bother.