General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRep. Rashida Tlaib is a hero to this Holocaust survivor
and if you truly want to listen to some f*%ing, mind blowing life experiences, tune in.
leftstreet
(36,128 posts)redqueen
(115,113 posts)Thanks for sharing this.
people
(641 posts)There will never be any peace there unless Israel is willing to make compromises with the Palestinians. Revenge bombing is only going to increase the hatred and dehumanization on all sides. This is a terrible ongoing tragedy. The holocaust survivor in the video you posted has seen it all.
malaise
(270,679 posts)Rec
Nanjeanne
(5,058 posts)Mosby
(16,564 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,916 posts)The lady in the OP recognizes "never again" to be a universal statement, she can empathize with the Palestinians being bombed because of her childhood experience being bombed with white phosphorous during the Holocaust by the Allies and that Gaza 40+%
of the population are children in a densely populated area being bombed.
The lady in your clip is inwardly focused at her own grief and the loss of her son, she is in deep pain and this is perfectly understandable.
Nanjeanne
(5,058 posts)says nothing about Netanyahu or killing all Palestinians or anything about the current situation in Gaza. She shares her pain about the horrific attack and losing her son. Hamas did that horrible act. No argument there. But her words are not the words of the Tweeter who, as the Israeli Government Spokesperson, is posting her short video snippet.
We can and should listen to her and feel her pain. I can do that and also want a ceasefire and the end to this mass killing of civilians the children of Israel and Palestine deserve our compassion and our guidance. We need to give them peace.
Polybius
(15,723 posts)There will always be some from any group that supports bigotry against their own kind.
Uncle Joe
(58,916 posts)Do you have any evidence?
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)Then she has chosen for a hero someone who defends the use of a phrase that calls for the eradication of the state of Israel.
I would consider that bigotry against Jews, but YMMV.
Uncle Joe
(58,916 posts)YMMV
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)That doesnt negate the fact that she has defended the use of From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.
Thats a clarion call for the destruction of Israel.
So of course she wants a ceasefire, because a ceasefire would benefit Hamas, whose mantra she is defending.
Uncle Joe
(58,916 posts)A land connection from the West Bank to the Gaza Strip in a united and free Palestine is from the river to the sea, that doesn't mean the elimination of Israel.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)For 75 years the meaning doesnt change just because people want it to, namely people who are using it and defending it. Then being called out for supporting genocide against Jews.
Uncle Joe
(58,916 posts)RainWalker
(605 posts)SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)To defend a mantra used by Hamas calling for genocide against the Jews.
Uncle Joe
(58,916 posts)especially in comparison to the Palestinians and the Israelis trapped in their Hatfield and McCoy, Groundhog Day circle of hell forever.
I believe the Palestinians have long deserved a free and democratic Palestine, the Gazans have been living in the world's largest outdoor prison and almost 50% of them are children.
The greatest security Israel could ever have is a free, independent and democratic Palestine.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)Need their own state. But I can do that without calling for the destruction of Israel Tlaib obviously cant.
Autumn
(45,147 posts)PCIntern
(25,853 posts)This BS needs to stop. Itd be like saying a certain word beginning with n when used in a sentence doesnt mean what you think it means. Yes it does. This is revisionist linguistics and is puerile and malicious in its intent.
JohnSJ
(92,748 posts)1967 war Nassar was throwing that slogan out, "we will push Israel to the sea", and there was no doubt what he meant as he massed troops around Israel along with other Arab countries with the very real intent to destroy Israel.
Anyone who uses that phrase knows exactly the history of it, and what it means.
If they didn't mean the destruction of Israel, they wouldn't use that phrase, they would have called for a two-state solution with an independent Palestinian state. The fact that they didn't, speaks for itself.
tritsofme
(17,575 posts)I really dont get it. Its hard to believe they dont know exactly what they are saying.
JohnSJ
(92,748 posts)they be referring to?
I am sure some uninformed people unaware of the geography of the area will believe their crap, "what it doesn't mean"
Polybius
(15,723 posts)That's enough evidence. Every group has self-haters, although I give this woman a pass because of her age. She may not know what she's saying.
JohnSJ
(92,748 posts)Israel. That is not to say that Netanyahu doesn't deserve criticism, and to be voted out, but even before Netanyahu their anti-Israel bias was there.
Their anti-Hillary coverage, along with anti-Hillary interviews I have no doubt influenced a good number of their progressive viewers not to vote for Hillary in 2016.
Uncle Joe
(58,916 posts)JohnSJ
(92,748 posts)they are independently funded by viewers.
If you dont believe Democracy Now has a left wing bias, I suggest you may have a bias yourself
Uncle Joe
(58,916 posts)betsuni
(26,234 posts)lies about Hillary Clinton, not news, propaganda. Funded by "grassroots" idiots who hate Democrats, as if that's even true. Democracy Now hates Democrats because they're beholden to their "grassroots" funders who hate Democrats. It's capitalism, status quo, establishment, etc.
JohnSJ
(92,748 posts)The likes of Glenn Greenwald, Julian Assange, Jill Stein, etc. pushed their babble with very little interview pushback
obamanut2012
(26,327 posts)Good grief. That is the only takeaway from your saying, "...supports bigotry against their own kind."
JohnSJ
(92,748 posts)saying the same thing regarding the Jewish Holocaust survivor being profiled here, but pointing out that just being part of a demographic group does not exempt individuals within that group from being anti that group.
Nanjeanne
(5,058 posts)activist all her life. She has written numerous books and fought for civil rights. She is being true to her self and her decades long fight for humanity. To suggest she is anti her group is disgraceful. You dont have to agree with her points to respect her desire for peace.
JohnSJ
(92,748 posts)Holocaust Survivor being profiled here, and for you to suggest I did is insulting and false
Nanjeanne
(5,058 posts)Just others possibly.
JohnSJ
(92,748 posts)I would not disparage anyones personal tragedies
radicalleft
(482 posts)and at the same time so inspirational. To have to witness those attrocities and carry that kind of trauma, yet dedicate her life to peace is amazing! She is a treasure!
MustLoveBeagles
(11,772 posts)Thanks for posting
betsuni
(26,234 posts)JackCoop
(119 posts)Rec