Fetterman: 'I'm done normalizing this dysfunction'

[Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin]

Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman (D) expressed his frustration with the recent state of Congress in the wake of the Senate voting to approve a continuing resolution (CR) to keep the government funded Saturday.

“I voted at 8:30pm on a Saturday night, that’s my job,” Fetterman said in a statement “But the American people should never have to worry about their government shutting down. Pushing the snooze button solves nothing, because these same losers will try to pull the same s— in 45 days.”

“I voted yes tonight to keep the government open, but I’m done normalizing this dysfunction,” Fetterman continued. “This is not entertainment, it’s governance. We must not allow the Freedom Caucus to turn our government into The Steve Wilkos Show.”

In an 88-9 vote, the Senate approved the CR to keep the government funded after the House passed it earlier in the day. The bill aims to fund the government at its current levels through mid-November and features $16 billion in relief for natural disaster victims.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/fetterman-m-done-normalizing-dysfunction-025732315.html

[senseandsensibility]

1. Plain speaking

Something missing in much of the Dem party now and it is sorely needed.

[jaxexpat]

2. Yeah, and at this rate how long before he's Franken-ized?

[SouthernDem4ever]

4. Can ANYONE be Franken-ized after years of Donald Dump?

I think not. If someone is unethical or guilty, that is a different matter.

[AllyCat]

10. Why would he be Frankened?

[jaxexpat]

11. Because he is plain speaking.....

Takes nothing from the Republicans at face value and doesn't mind saying so on an open mike. In Frankens case, that was unallowed.

[ShazzieB]

16. Franken wasn't forced to resign for speaking his mind.

That's not what happened.

[jaxexpat]

23. He wasn't forced. He asked for an investigation, Democratic leadership refused, so he quit.

They left him seemingly unsupported and out in the cold. I've wondered if that were because an actual investigation would have uncovered some embarrassing truths and in the interest of party health he decided to resign.

[yardwork]

5. Yes, and we must support him.

[Oopsie Daisy]

13. I dislike swearing by politicians. As Democrats, we should set the bar higher, not lower.

Swearing or cursing in public by elected politicians undermines the dignity and respect associated with their office. As public representatives, politicians are entrusted with the responsibility of making important decisions and shaping policies that impact the lives of citizens. Their behavior should reflect the seriousness and professionalism that is expected of them.

Using profanity in public settings can be seen as disrespectful and offensive to many people. It can create a negative image of the politician and diminish public trust in their ability to effectively carry out their duties. It can also detract from the substantive issues being discussed and shift the focus onto the inappropriate language used.

Furthermore, politicians serve as role models for society, particularly for young people who look up to them. By maintaining a respectful and civil demeanor, politicians can inspire others to engage in constructive dialogue and work towards positive change. Swearing or cursing in public sends the wrong message and sets a poor example for the public, especially for the younger generation.

Lastly, the use of inappropriate language can escalate tensions and hinder productive discourse. It can polarize public opinion and create unnecessary divisions. Political debates and discussions should be centered around ideas, policies, and principles, rather than being clouded by offensive language.

I think it's important for politicians (especially Democrats) to uphold the dignity of the office, maintain professionalism, set a positive example, and foster a more respectful and constructive political environment.

That's not too much to ask for, is it?

[malthaussen]

14. The point is not without merit...

... but Mr Fetterman was elected precisely because he violates those norms (as well as the Senate dress code). He is a populist who shows no signs (yet) of also being a demagogue, and his vocabulary choices and rhetorical attitude reflect his constituency.

His popularity suggests that the electorate is tired of hypocrisy, or of the old symbols which have so dismally failed to have any substance to go along with them. It could be argued that he merely displays a different set of symbols, but he has shown substance in the past, and I think will show substance in the future.

-- Mal

[lildDemz]

20. Profanities

are like chuckholes in the road and banana peels on the floor.

[Oopsie Daisy]

22. As someone who frequently swears out loud, I know that a good "FUCK" can be very satisfying.

I just think it's inappropriate and unnecessary for our elected officials to do it in public. It may be "satisfying" for some folks to hear and fist-pump (ie: when Beto called someone a "motherfucker') but ultimately I think it shows a lack of class, decorum, respect, and impulse control.

[twodogsbarking]

3. I like John and support him. Working within the lunacy may be a challenge for him.

[malthaussen]

15. My own (uninformed, speculative) opinion is that it is a challenge...

... and probably contributed to his depression. It's hard to get anything done in the Senate, and John is a guy who likes to get things done.

-- Mal

[Snackshack]

6. Too late.

You…already did that.

In just this same fashion. There are endless tough sounding quotes from Dems, few GOP and others filling up the internet…but not 1 single fucking action by Congress…well that’s not entirely true congress did take 1 action… you voted to hold some members in Contempt, remember that? It was never enforced or acted on and most do not even remember you that so in essence…not 1 thing has been done but it’s nice to know Now that you have decided to stop normalizing it.

[orleans]

12. what exactly are you referring to? nt

[ShazzieB]

18. Clarification, please.

Who is "you" and what did they already do?

[XanaDUer2]

7. It needs to be said. Nt

[thesquanderer]

8. Steve Wilkos?

He is that well known that people will largely get the reference? I had never heard of him.

[ShazzieB]

17. Me, neither.

[LoisB]

19. Jerry Springer show. Had his own show for a while. I never saw it but knew about it.

[ffr]

9. These same losers...

But seriously, he's right. Why the fuck is legislation constantly being held hostage by a few LOSERS? The House of Representatives needs to have some definition quizzes covered and graded, like what is the definition of the House of Representatives? It should be a body of elected officials who represent their constituents and not an authoritarian body held hostage by the most extreme elements in that body.

FFS!!!

[Grins]

21. "In an 88-9 vote, the Senate approved the CR ..."

There are 50 Republican Senators.
That means 41 Republican Senators (82%) voted with DEMOCRATS to keep the nation open.

18% of Republicans in the US Senate, to paraphrase Limbaugh, “hate America.”