George Takei on Lin Wood not being a Georgia RICO defendent

[BootinUp]

George Takei :verified: 🏳️?🌈🖖🏽
@[email protected]

It’s always interesting to me to see who HASN’T been named in an indictment like the RICO case in Georgia. One of those names belongs to lawyer Lin Wood, who helped spread election fraud lies alongside his pals Sidney Powell, Rudy Giuliani, and Jenna Ellis, who were all named as defendants.

And now, look! In one of Fani Willis’s motions, Lin Wood is listed among the names of the STATE’S witnesses in Georgia. Guess we know who he has been talking to and ratting out.

https://universeodon.com/@georgetakei/111098145700982435

[Ocelot II]

1. If they haven't been indicted they're talking.

[The Magistrate]

2. He's A Pretty Loopy Witness, Ma'am

Did the fitness hearing at the Georgia Bar conclude yet?

[BootinUp]

4. That's all a calculated act I think.

He might be a devastating witness for all I know.

[fredamoss3]

5. It may just be window-dressing the witness list.

He may never be called but might be a factor in some others flipping.

[Irish_Dem]

8. I agree, with loopy, unreliable witnesses they could be used to intimate the guilty.

But even mentally ill witnesses could provide important information.
Though they cannot be used on the stand.

[Ocelot II]

9. He's as mad as a box of frogs, but that doesn't mean

he doesn't have knowledge that can lead to useful evidence. He's probably too nuts to actually testify, but he probably knows stuff they can use.

[The Magistrate]

10. I Agree, Ma'am

But I'd pay to watch him on the stand....

[Effete Snob]

13. Correct

[Effete Snob]

3. Lin Wood would be a horrible witness

He has a credible insanity defense. Anyone who would put him on the stand for testimony is a fool.

[thesquanderer]

7. Maybe they realized his insanity would make him unconvictable on these charges,

and that's why they didn't indict!

[PJMcK]

11. AG Willis put him on her witness list

Is that your opinion of her?

I guess we’ll see what happens.

[Effete Snob]

12. Lol

Clearly you do not understand that the prosecuting attorney is required to disclose the names of all persons who might be called as witnesses.

Lin Wood testified to the grand jury and is not in the indictment, so his name went on the list.

My opinion of her is fine. It would be nice if people in her custody did not die from being eaten by insects, however.

My opinion of people who don't know what the fuck they are talking about and assume that a name on a list means that the person in question has developed some kind of animus toward Trump or toward the election fraud in general, is not high. Nor do I appreciate cutesy personal digs from said same.

Lin Wood likely holds the same insane opinions he ever held and likely believes the election was stolen. That does not negate what value he might have as a witness to certain facts or communications. It remains hazardous to actually call him as a witness, given the full range of things he believes and says.

The extrapolations being made from this routine listing of witnesses are just dumb.

Other people manage to understand that, so I imagine you have some more personal commentary to make:

https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=18288307

[William769]

6. K&R.