Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGov. Greg Abbott says he wouldn't get rid of the floating barrier unless SCOTUS tells him to
Texas Gov. Abbott doesn't want to remove his 1,000-foot Rio Grande barrier full of metal blades unless the Supreme Court tells him toAfter a federal judge ruled Texas must get rid of a 1,000-foot barrier designed to deter migrants from crossing the Rio Grande, Gov. Greg Abbott said he'd appeal the decision and wouldn't get rid of the floating barrier unless SCOTUS tells him to.
On Wednesday, Judge David Ezra of the US District Court in Austin ordered the removal of the barrier and required Texas to foot the bill, pushing back on Abbott's decision to install it back in July "without authorization of any kind," ruling the buoy system is "an obstruction to the navigable capacity of that waterway" and a "threat to human life."
"Governor Abbott announced that he was not 'asking for permission' for Operation Lone Star, the anti-immigration program under which Texas constructed the floating barrier. Unfortunately for Texas, permission is exactly what federal law requires before installing obstructions in the nation's navigable waters," he said.
Abbott swiftly responded, declaring plans to appeal. "Today's court decision merely prolongs President Biden's willful refusal to acknowledge that Texas is rightfully stepping up to do the job that he should have been doing all along," his office wrote, adding that "Texas is prepared to take this fight all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court."
On Wednesday, Judge David Ezra of the US District Court in Austin ordered the removal of the barrier and required Texas to foot the bill, pushing back on Abbott's decision to install it back in July "without authorization of any kind," ruling the buoy system is "an obstruction to the navigable capacity of that waterway" and a "threat to human life."
"Governor Abbott announced that he was not 'asking for permission' for Operation Lone Star, the anti-immigration program under which Texas constructed the floating barrier. Unfortunately for Texas, permission is exactly what federal law requires before installing obstructions in the nation's navigable waters," he said.
Abbott swiftly responded, declaring plans to appeal. "Today's court decision merely prolongs President Biden's willful refusal to acknowledge that Texas is rightfully stepping up to do the job that he should have been doing all along," his office wrote, adding that "Texas is prepared to take this fight all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court."
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
10 replies, 908 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
Gov. Greg Abbott says he wouldn't get rid of the floating barrier unless SCOTUS tells him to (Original Post)
In It to Win It
Sep 2023
OP
Add another Republican to the list that don't believe in the rule of law and the
sinkingfeeling
Sep 2023
#1
sinkingfeeling
(51,694 posts)1. Add another Republican to the list that don't believe in the rule of law and the
separation of powers or democracy as we've known it.
riversedge
(70,983 posts)2. Abbott is a slimy jackass.
Shermann
(7,674 posts)3. Cover me!
At least he's willing to die on that hill (or river as it were). SCOTUS may not provide the cover fire he needs though.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,361 posts)4. I still don't know how much good 1,000 feet of big orange balls does
when the Texas/Mexico border is over 1,200 MILES long. Add another 700 miles for the New Mexico, Arizona and California borders.
Gore1FL
(21,252 posts)5. The solution is simple enough.
Send in the necessary military equipment to remove it and send TX the bill.
![](/emoticons/hattip.gif)
gohuskies
(1,161 posts)7. Send the feds in to take that murderous buoy out of the river
Abbot is just another rethuglican scofflaw that needs his ass kicked.
bluestarone
(17,381 posts)8. Well i guess let's leave it in there, then dump
ABBOTT wheel chair and all 50 feet upstream from it, and walk away.
ExWhoDoesntCare
(4,741 posts)9. Maybe Mexico should remove the problem
That this dolt set up in their part of their river.
I have a feeling that would end this nonsense, tout suite.
Marthe48
(17,474 posts)10. f*** off
You are a cruel and evil human.