Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

underpants

(183,672 posts)
Wed Aug 30, 2023, 08:33 AM Aug 2023

Shooting at White Sox ⚾️ game - gun got in park in lady's belly fat. Accidentally discharged.

Shooting at White Sox game happened after woman hid gun in belly, per report


New details have emerged after a shooting injured two women at Guaranteed Rate Field during a Chicago White Sox game on Friday night.

On Tuesday, ESPN Chicago reporter Peggy Kusinski said that the gun was snuck into the stadium by one of the women who was hit. The shooting was "an accidental discharge" by the woman whose injury was previously identified as "a graze wound."

"She reportedly snuck the gun in past metal detectors hiding it in the folds of her belly fat," Kusinski said in a post on X.

Police previously said that a 42-year-old woman "sustained one gun-shot wound to the leg" and a 26-year-old woman "also sustained a graze wound to the abdomen."

https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/whitesox/2023/08/29/white-sox-game-shooting-fan-snuck-gun-into-stadium-in-belly/70710099007/

68 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Shooting at White Sox ⚾️ game - gun got in park in lady's belly fat. Accidentally discharged. (Original Post) underpants Aug 2023 OP
jfc RandySF Aug 2023 #1
only in Amurka... gunz in your gunt CurtEastPoint Aug 2023 #2
You want fries with that? underpants Aug 2023 #3
There is no such thing as an accidental discharge Kaleva Aug 2023 #4
No such thing? BeyondGeography Aug 2023 #10
We are talking about guns. You want to switch to talking about cars Kaleva Aug 2023 #33
No, we are talking word choice BeyondGeography Aug 2023 #35
From the article Kaleva Aug 2023 #38
Au contraire, mon capitane. They're very rare but they do happen. sir pball Aug 2023 #13
So why did you have a gun that was very well worn? Kaleva Aug 2023 #31
Because it had been regularly used for decades prior to the unintentional discharge. sir pball Aug 2023 #41
Did you ever bring it in to a gunsmith for inspection? Kaleva Aug 2023 #57
disagree Lurker Deluxe Aug 2023 #39
An incredible act of stupid. n/t Eyeball_Kid Aug 2023 #5
Hide a gun in your Panniculus. Coming soon, belly searches at the stadium gate. sarcasmo Aug 2023 #6
my vocabulary word of the day waddirum Aug 2023 #15
+1 sarcasmo Aug 2023 #26
jfc, I googled images for Panniculus Celerity Aug 2023 #44
I see those on every "600 lb life" BlueWaveNeverEnd Aug 2023 #48
I have never watched any of those type of shows. No interest in them for multiple reasons. Celerity Aug 2023 #51
Ugh MorbidButterflyTat Aug 2023 #49
Holy moly Diamond_Dog Aug 2023 #7
Wanded but thought it was her belt buckle? underpants Aug 2023 #8
I never would have thought of that Diamond_Dog Aug 2023 #9
I'm Going With The Latter ProfessorGAC Aug 2023 #43
It's been so long since I've been to an MLB game ExWhoDoesntCare Aug 2023 #59
Maybe she was in a wheelchair? pfitz59 Aug 2023 #60
Lead lined fat. Chainfire Aug 2023 #28
Why on earth would this woman think that she would NEED to smuggle a gun into Liberal In Texas Aug 2023 #11
+100 sinkingfeeling Aug 2023 #18
Well, OK. Solly Mack Aug 2023 #12
Like a MorbidButterflyTat Aug 2023 #50
That works, too. I guess. Solly Mack Aug 2023 #52
No legitimate reason to sneak it past security, what was her real plan for the gun? Lancero Aug 2023 #14
Sounds like multigraincracker Aug 2023 #16
Was supposedly a CPS teacher as well. Ace Rothstein Aug 2023 #17
Gut shot! 😬 Floyd R. Turbo Aug 2023 #19
! liberalla Aug 2023 #20
Profile heavy women? Sneederbunk Aug 2023 #21
This is the most American headline ever written Sympthsical Aug 2023 #22
Okay, so A- what is the assholes name Snooper9 Aug 2023 #23
LMAO inthewind21 Aug 2023 #66
As Soon As I Heard The Report That These Women Were Shot At The Ballpark..... global1 Aug 2023 #24
No one has "fessed up". former9thward Aug 2023 #45
I hope they fully searched her Xavier Breath Aug 2023 #25
Maybe MorbidButterflyTat Aug 2023 #53
In-creases gun violence! 😁 Floyd R. Turbo Aug 2023 #27
That was good. DUzy good! SYFROYH Aug 2023 #46
😃 Floyd R. Turbo Aug 2023 #47
Or maybe not... sarisataka Aug 2023 #29
What on earth . . . Sympthsical Aug 2023 #30
Titillating click bait sarisataka Aug 2023 #32
It's such a specific story though Sympthsical Aug 2023 #37
Okay. I guess we need to wait and see. underpants Aug 2023 #34
Oh, her lawyer said that? MorbidButterflyTat Aug 2023 #54
Those are some very good questions sarisataka Aug 2023 #61
Wow.. TY.. the mystery continues. Cha Aug 2023 #56
The woman who was hiding the gun... LuckyCharms Aug 2023 #36
Giggling underpants Aug 2023 #40
"Lady"? Beetwasher. Aug 2023 #42
WHY? she should be Banned for life Cha Aug 2023 #55
Do believe a ESPN tweet? former9thward Aug 2023 #63
Just when you think Americans ExWhoDoesntCare Aug 2023 #58
A trigger to pull twice? former9thward Aug 2023 #62
If it can pull once in those circumstances ExWhoDoesntCare Aug 2023 #64
I don't believe that. former9thward Aug 2023 #65
Somethings Really Fishy About This Whole Incident.... global1 Sep 2023 #67
I wonder if they have any video of that area of the stands when it happened. former9thward Sep 2023 #68

BeyondGeography

(39,438 posts)
10. No such thing?
Wed Aug 30, 2023, 09:11 AM
Aug 2023

Gun logic is fun.

No such thing as car accidents, eg, just negligent acts of car management.

Humans aren’t accident-prone, they’re negligence-prone.

Takes you down an interesting road, like we don’t just need protection from others but from ourselves.

Kaleva

(36,603 posts)
33. We are talking about guns. You want to switch to talking about cars
Wed Aug 30, 2023, 01:31 PM
Aug 2023

"Negligence is the failure to behave with the level of care that a reasonable person would have exercised under the same circumstances. Either a person's actions or omissions of actions can be found negligent."

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/negligence#:~:text=Negligence%20is%20the%20failure%20to,actions%20can%20be%20found%20negligent.

Kaleva

(36,603 posts)
38. From the article
Wed Aug 30, 2023, 02:28 PM
Aug 2023

"1. The accidental discharge occurs when a firearm discharges absent human interaction with the trigger. Examples would be older firearms that aren’t drop safe, or situations where a foreign object gets pushed into the trigger guard resulting in activation of the trigger mechanism."

https://www.policemag.com/weapons/article/15307827/dont-call-it-a-negligent-discharge

If one has a gun that isn't drop safe, it should be retired. It's the responsibility of the gun owner to know if their guns are drop safe or not

It's up to the gun owner to ensure that foreign objects don't get pushed into the trigger guard. If that remains a possibility, then the prudent thing to do is not to have a round in the chamber. The odds of a armed gun owner getting killed or seriously injured by an assailant because they didn't have a round in the chamber is extremely small. I have yet to hear about such a case. It may have happened but I haven't come across an example yet.

sir pball

(4,822 posts)
13. Au contraire, mon capitane. They're very rare but they do happen.
Wed Aug 30, 2023, 09:24 AM
Aug 2023

Yes, most "accidental" discharges are negligent trigger pulls. But I have had, once, a very well-worn 1911 truly and accidentally discharge when I racked it (it was immediately unloaded and taken to a gunsmith); that's why you always point it in a safe direction.

Kaleva

(36,603 posts)
31. So why did you have a gun that was very well worn?
Wed Aug 30, 2023, 01:21 PM
Aug 2023

I could see keeping it but as you were well aware of it's condition, it should not have been loaded

Edit. At least until you brought it in to a reputable gunsmith to check it out and replace/repair anything that needed it .

sir pball

(4,822 posts)
41. Because it had been regularly used for decades prior to the unintentional discharge.
Wed Aug 30, 2023, 06:34 PM
Aug 2023

It was my grandfather's from the war; at the time of the incident it was still fired (and therefore stripped and cleaned) at least monthly. It wasn't pulled from a dusty box in the attic after decades of decay.

I suppose you could make a case that it's negligent to not fully disassemble and inspect a firearm of a certain age before every single session regardless of use status, but that's quite a stretch IMO. If it worked fine two weeks ago, and the week before that, and a few weeks before that, so forth and so on, well, that's why you always point it in a safe direction while loading. That said, you presumably take the former view, so I don't see much further to discuss

Kaleva

(36,603 posts)
57. Did you ever bring it in to a gunsmith for inspection?
Thu Aug 31, 2023, 04:09 AM
Aug 2023

Just asking as you stated you were aware of the guns condition.

Lurker Deluxe

(1,041 posts)
39. disagree
Wed Aug 30, 2023, 02:36 PM
Aug 2023

A gun is a mechanical devise. Mechanical devises have failures, no matter how well inspected and maintained.

We always used to say an injury is lack of being prepared for an accident.

I would hold this to be true concerning an accidental firearm discharge. Being prepared for such an incident prevents an injury.

Many years ago while bench sighting a .300 Weatherby a round was triggered and did not fire, when activating the bolt to remove the round it discharged, still being in the bench it went where is was intended to go it caused no harm. It was taken to the gunsmith who found no failure or reason.

Could have been anything: faulty primer, bad round, a spec of sand stuck to the end of the round, or just bad luck. Being prepared for an accident prevented an injury.

Gun is always loaded. There is a reason for that.

MorbidButterflyTat

(1,962 posts)
49. Ugh
Wed Aug 30, 2023, 10:42 PM
Aug 2023

Then I did...

...maybe she had that gun to off herself. I'm no model, but I couldn't live like that, lugging my gut around in a wheel barrow.

underpants

(183,672 posts)
8. Wanded but thought it was her belt buckle?
Wed Aug 30, 2023, 08:59 AM
Aug 2023

Or maybe security isn’t that tight.

My wife and I went to a major college football game last year (Ohio State at Maryland) and security was super tight. Very visible too.

Diamond_Dog

(32,597 posts)
9. I never would have thought of that
Wed Aug 30, 2023, 09:09 AM
Aug 2023

Sad that in this day and age such tight security is required. But you get 100,000 people in the Shoe you figure at least a few are crazy nuts. Meaning not Buckeye fan nuts, the dangerous kind of nuts.

ProfessorGAC

(66,184 posts)
43. I'm Going With The Latter
Wed Aug 30, 2023, 08:24 PM
Aug 2023

I set off the metal detector at Pearson in Toronto around 30 years back.
It was a paper clip in my pants pocket.
I think a magnetometer would have to be off to miss a gun surrounded by nothing more than fat & water.
Also, since there's this thing called gravity, how would a heavy metal object stay in the folds of the skin while walking.
This whole story smells bad.

 

ExWhoDoesntCare

(4,741 posts)
59. It's been so long since I've been to an MLB game
Thu Aug 31, 2023, 05:05 AM
Aug 2023

That I can't remember if we even went through metal detectors. Would have been 2011, San Francisco's park--whatever name it wears now. It was AT&T then.

And speaking of--I'm sick of corporate names on civic buildings. Just name parks after the teams or legendary players. "Willie Mays Field" has a great ring to it, after all.

Anything but bloody Candlestick. I still get a nervous tic thinking about that nightmare.

Liberal In Texas

(13,767 posts)
11. Why on earth would this woman think that she would NEED to smuggle a gun into
Wed Aug 30, 2023, 09:17 AM
Aug 2023

a baseball game?

Worried about getting mugged at the hot dog stand? I can not imagine a situation where you'd need a gun at a sporting event.

Solly Mack

(90,913 posts)
12. Well, OK.
Wed Aug 30, 2023, 09:21 AM
Aug 2023

Sort of an otter pocket, I guess. Kind of creative.

Stupid, but creative.

I'm glad it wasn't any worse.

Lancero

(3,034 posts)
14. No legitimate reason to sneak it past security, what was her real plan for the gun?
Wed Aug 30, 2023, 09:25 AM
Aug 2023

Whatever it was, it's quite lucky that only one innocent person was injured here.

 

Snooper9

(484 posts)
23. Okay, so A- what is the assholes name
Wed Aug 30, 2023, 11:14 AM
Aug 2023

B- where are our pictures
C- What kind of stupid statement is this "The White Sox are thinking of the victims at this time and wishing them a speedy recovery."

How about-
"The White Sox would like it if douchebags didn't bring guns in their fat rolls to our stadium"


LOL

global1

(25,417 posts)
24. As Soon As I Heard The Report That These Women Were Shot At The Ballpark.....
Wed Aug 30, 2023, 11:22 AM
Aug 2023

I said to my friend as we watched the news of this shooting - that the gun was most likely her gun.

They showed were these women were sitting. There was no way that the shot would have come in from outside the park.

It sounded like to me that they were covering for themselves when they got shot.

This woman - should be banned forever from being able to see a White Sox game and she should also be fined or jailed for smuggling a gun into the park.

I wouldn't want to fly with her either - so put her on the no-fly list.

It took days for this info to come out that she smuggled the gun in - in her belly fat. The police and the White Sox were very sketchy when talking about this incident. I'm glad they finally got this woman to fess up to her crime.

It's a good thing no one else was shot or hurt - or she would be in a whole lot more trouble now.

I would have like to heard her first story as to what happened and how she initially covered up that it was her gun.

former9thward

(32,415 posts)
45. No one has "fessed up".
Wed Aug 30, 2023, 08:33 PM
Aug 2023

She denies the story and the police have not commented. This comes from an ESPN tweet. That is it.

Xavier Breath

(3,825 posts)
25. I hope they fully searched her
Wed Aug 30, 2023, 11:32 AM
Aug 2023

fat rolls for any other hidden contraband. There was likely a flask in there at some point, too. Yeesh.

Also, 'Guaranteed Rate Field?' My, but that does inspire the baseball romantic, eh?

sarisataka

(19,528 posts)
29. Or maybe not...
Wed Aug 30, 2023, 01:16 PM
Aug 2023
Woman shot at Chicago White Sox game denies bringing gun to park; ATF joins investigation

One of the women who was shot at the Chicago White Sox game on Friday night, says she didn't bring the gun into Guaranteed Rate Field.

Her attorneys spoke out Tuesday and they said their client was sitting in the stands when she was hit by a bullet.

The attorneys, who said the woman is a season tickets holder, released a statement saying, "Our client underwent emergency medical treatment for a gunshot wound she received while attending a baseball game. She denies bringing a firearm into the stadium and further denies having anything to do with the discharge of a firearm at the stadium. We have reviewed photographic evidence and x-rays of our client's injuries with firearms and medical experts who confirm the gunshot wound our client sustained was not self-inflicted and was not the result of her accidentally discharging a firearm. We will continue investigating this matter further to pursue justice on behalf of our client who sustained serious personal injuries as a result of this shooting."
https://abc7chicago.com/white-sox-shooting-guaranteed-rate-field-chicago-public-schools-graham-elementary-school/13718697/

Evidence is also lacking as they further note no gunshot residue was found on her clothing and security footage showed she did not set off the metal detector when entering the stadium.

sarisataka

(19,528 posts)
32. Titillating click bait
Wed Aug 30, 2023, 01:30 PM
Aug 2023

"Lady smuggles gun in her fat rolls" will get lots of attention. No facts needed, just "unnamed sources".

Obviously it worked as it appears to have started with an ESPN tweet (or whatever they are now) and was amplified by many news sources.

Sympthsical

(9,238 posts)
37. It's such a specific story though
Wed Aug 30, 2023, 01:54 PM
Aug 2023

I'm so curious to know who the sources were that ESPN was confident enough to run with that.

Or maybe, as happens frequently, the story was "too good to check"

MorbidButterflyTat

(1,962 posts)
54. Oh, her lawyer said that?
Wed Aug 30, 2023, 10:58 PM
Aug 2023

So who had the gun? And where is it now? There must have been dozens of witnesses. No one saw the shooter? Maybe he was invisible, or flew away, or disappeared into the space-time continuum, and now he's in the future, planting evidence against her...

I'd totally trust her and her lawyer.

sarisataka

(19,528 posts)
61. Those are some very good questions
Thu Aug 31, 2023, 09:50 AM
Aug 2023

But the police haven't said they found a gun, let alone in her possession, no GSR, she passed through a metal detector that was confirmed to be working...

As much as it pains me to admit, I am going to give weight to what her lawyer says.

Tweeted accusations are fine, I guess, but a shred of evidence to support the accusation would be nice.

former9thward

(32,415 posts)
63. Do believe a ESPN tweet?
Thu Aug 31, 2023, 12:02 PM
Aug 2023

That is the only source for this story. The woman denies it and the police will not comment.

 

ExWhoDoesntCare

(4,741 posts)
58. Just when you think Americans
Thu Aug 31, 2023, 04:50 AM
Aug 2023

Couldn't get any dumber...

Did it not occur to this moron that a gun is not meant to be carried in that location, because the way fat can ooze around can disengage a safety, and cause a trigger to pull?

Now MLB will be wanding everyone getting into a park.

former9thward

(32,415 posts)
65. I don't believe that.
Thu Aug 31, 2023, 05:31 PM
Aug 2023

And this story is based on one person's tweet. It has no other source. The woman denies it. The Sox say there were no issues with the woman when she went through the entry gate (they have video) and the police have made no comments.

global1

(25,417 posts)
67. Somethings Really Fishy About This Whole Incident....
Fri Sep 1, 2023, 12:28 AM
Sep 2023

A shooting inside the park. Lady(s) hit in the foot/leg. The other day the police say that the shot didn't come from outside the park.

Today - the owner of the team - Reinsdorf said in a televised news report that he talked with the police and the shot didn't come from within the park.

If you see the footage of the commotion in the stands when this happened - they were sitting pretty low in the stands - there didn't seem to be a vantage point to have a shot come from outside the park - especially if it hit at the foot or leg beneath the seats. Then we have the report that the lady that was shot - smuggled the gun in in her belly fat. Hmmmm.....

It just sounds like there is some sort of cover-up going on. I don't recall seeing the woman interviewed nor have they mentioned her name.

I would think it's in the best interest for the owner to say that the shot didn't come from within the park. The Sox are having a bad year. The worst thing that can happen this late in the season is to have people stop coming to the ballpark because they are afraid of getting shot - or that the feel that the security measures at the park are lax or faulty.

An already down year would just get worse with respect to attendance if that were the case.

Something just sounds fishy about this whole thing. Appears to be some sort of cover-up going on.

former9thward

(32,415 posts)
68. I wonder if they have any video of that area of the stands when it happened.
Fri Sep 1, 2023, 12:38 AM
Sep 2023

Not just a tv camera swinging over that way after it happened. I agree something very fishy and some sort of cover up.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Shooting at White Sox &#9...