General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsShooting at White Sox ⚾️ game - gun got in park in lady's belly fat. Accidentally discharged.
Shooting at White Sox game happened after woman hid gun in belly, per report
New details have emerged after a shooting injured two women at Guaranteed Rate Field during a Chicago White Sox game on Friday night.
On Tuesday, ESPN Chicago reporter Peggy Kusinski said that the gun was snuck into the stadium by one of the women who was hit. The shooting was "an accidental discharge" by the woman whose injury was previously identified as "a graze wound."
"She reportedly snuck the gun in past metal detectors hiding it in the folds of her belly fat," Kusinski said in a post on X.
Police previously said that a 42-year-old woman "sustained one gun-shot wound to the leg" and a 26-year-old woman "also sustained a graze wound to the abdomen."
https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/whitesox/2023/08/29/white-sox-game-shooting-fan-snuck-gun-into-stadium-in-belly/70710099007/
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
RandySF
(61,771 posts)CurtEastPoint
(18,787 posts)underpants
(183,672 posts)No kidding
Kaleva
(36,603 posts)There are negligent discharges.
BeyondGeography
(39,438 posts)Gun logic is fun.
No such thing as car accidents, eg, just negligent acts of car management.
Humans arent accident-prone, theyre negligence-prone.
Takes you down an interesting road, like we dont just need protection from others but from ourselves.
Kaleva
(36,603 posts)"Negligence is the failure to behave with the level of care that a reasonable person would have exercised under the same circumstances. Either a person's actions or omissions of actions can be found negligent."
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/negligence#:~:text=Negligence%20is%20the%20failure%20to,actions%20can%20be%20found%20negligent.
BeyondGeography
(39,438 posts)And negligent discharge has its critics:
https://www.policemag.com/weapons/article/15307827/dont-call-it-a-negligent-discharge
Kaleva
(36,603 posts)"1. The accidental discharge occurs when a firearm discharges absent human interaction with the trigger. Examples would be older firearms that arent drop safe, or situations where a foreign object gets pushed into the trigger guard resulting in activation of the trigger mechanism."
https://www.policemag.com/weapons/article/15307827/dont-call-it-a-negligent-discharge
If one has a gun that isn't drop safe, it should be retired. It's the responsibility of the gun owner to know if their guns are drop safe or not
It's up to the gun owner to ensure that foreign objects don't get pushed into the trigger guard. If that remains a possibility, then the prudent thing to do is not to have a round in the chamber. The odds of a armed gun owner getting killed or seriously injured by an assailant because they didn't have a round in the chamber is extremely small. I have yet to hear about such a case. It may have happened but I haven't come across an example yet.
sir pball
(4,822 posts)Yes, most "accidental" discharges are negligent trigger pulls. But I have had, once, a very well-worn 1911 truly and accidentally discharge when I racked it (it was immediately unloaded and taken to a gunsmith); that's why you always point it in a safe direction.
Kaleva
(36,603 posts)I could see keeping it but as you were well aware of it's condition, it should not have been loaded
Edit. At least until you brought it in to a reputable gunsmith to check it out and replace/repair anything that needed it .
sir pball
(4,822 posts)It was my grandfather's from the war; at the time of the incident it was still fired (and therefore stripped and cleaned) at least monthly. It wasn't pulled from a dusty box in the attic after decades of decay.
I suppose you could make a case that it's negligent to not fully disassemble and inspect a firearm of a certain age before every single session regardless of use status, but that's quite a stretch IMO. If it worked fine two weeks ago, and the week before that, and a few weeks before that, so forth and so on, well, that's why you always point it in a safe direction while loading. That said, you presumably take the former view, so I don't see much further to discuss
Kaleva
(36,603 posts)Just asking as you stated you were aware of the guns condition.
Lurker Deluxe
(1,041 posts)A gun is a mechanical devise. Mechanical devises have failures, no matter how well inspected and maintained.
We always used to say an injury is lack of being prepared for an accident.
I would hold this to be true concerning an accidental firearm discharge. Being prepared for such an incident prevents an injury.
Many years ago while bench sighting a .300 Weatherby a round was triggered and did not fire, when activating the bolt to remove the round it discharged, still being in the bench it went where is was intended to go it caused no harm. It was taken to the gunsmith who found no failure or reason.
Could have been anything: faulty primer, bad round, a spec of sand stuck to the end of the round, or just bad luck. Being prepared for an accident prevented an injury.
Gun is always loaded. There is a reason for that.
Eyeball_Kid
(7,468 posts)sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)waddirum
(981 posts)thanks
Celerity
(44,586 posts)![](/emoticons/puke.gif)
BlueWaveNeverEnd
(8,529 posts)Celerity
(44,586 posts)MorbidButterflyTat
(1,962 posts)Then I did...
...maybe she had that gun to off herself. I'm no model, but I couldn't live like that, lugging my gut around in a wheel barrow.
Diamond_Dog
(32,597 posts)How did she get through the metal detector?
And
. WHY???
underpants
(183,672 posts)Or maybe security isnt that tight.
My wife and I went to a major college football game last year (Ohio State at Maryland) and security was super tight. Very visible too.
Diamond_Dog
(32,597 posts)Sad that in this day and age such tight security is required. But you get 100,000 people in the Shoe you figure at least a few are crazy nuts. Meaning not Buckeye fan nuts, the dangerous kind of nuts.
ProfessorGAC
(66,184 posts)I set off the metal detector at Pearson in Toronto around 30 years back.
It was a paper clip in my pants pocket.
I think a magnetometer would have to be off to miss a gun surrounded by nothing more than fat & water.
Also, since there's this thing called gravity, how would a heavy metal object stay in the folds of the skin while walking.
This whole story smells bad.
ExWhoDoesntCare
(4,741 posts)That I can't remember if we even went through metal detectors. Would have been 2011, San Francisco's park--whatever name it wears now. It was AT&T then.
And speaking of--I'm sick of corporate names on civic buildings. Just name parks after the teams or legendary players. "Willie Mays Field" has a great ring to it, after all.
Anything but bloody Candlestick. I still get a nervous tic thinking about that nightmare.
pfitz59
(10,522 posts)And couldn't be properly wanded or searched?
Chainfire
(17,757 posts)Liberal In Texas
(13,767 posts)a baseball game?
Worried about getting mugged at the hot dog stand? I can not imagine a situation where you'd need a gun at a sporting event.
sinkingfeeling
(51,715 posts)Solly Mack
(90,913 posts)Sort of an otter pocket, I guess. Kind of creative.
Stupid, but creative.
I'm glad it wasn't any worse.
MorbidButterflyTat
(1,962 posts)kangaroo pouch?
Solly Mack
(90,913 posts)Either way, stupid of her.
Lancero
(3,034 posts)Whatever it was, it's quite lucky that only one innocent person was injured here.
multigraincracker
(33,018 posts)A whole lot of Rosie to me.
Per the tune.
Ace Rothstein
(3,229 posts)Floyd R. Turbo
(27,191 posts)liberalla
(9,374 posts)![](/emoticons/laughing.gif)
Sneederbunk
(14,421 posts)Was it a long gun?
Sympthsical
(9,238 posts)Snooper9
(484 posts)B- where are our pictures
C- What kind of stupid statement is this "The White Sox are thinking of the victims at this time and wishing them a speedy recovery."
How about-
"The White Sox would like it if douchebags didn't bring guns in their fat rolls to our stadium"
LOL
inthewind21
(4,616 posts)![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
You made me blow my coke out through my nose!
global1
(25,417 posts)I said to my friend as we watched the news of this shooting - that the gun was most likely her gun.
They showed were these women were sitting. There was no way that the shot would have come in from outside the park.
It sounded like to me that they were covering for themselves when they got shot.
This woman - should be banned forever from being able to see a White Sox game and she should also be fined or jailed for smuggling a gun into the park.
I wouldn't want to fly with her either - so put her on the no-fly list.
It took days for this info to come out that she smuggled the gun in - in her belly fat. The police and the White Sox were very sketchy when talking about this incident. I'm glad they finally got this woman to fess up to her crime.
It's a good thing no one else was shot or hurt - or she would be in a whole lot more trouble now.
I would have like to heard her first story as to what happened and how she initially covered up that it was her gun.
former9thward
(32,415 posts)She denies the story and the police have not commented. This comes from an ESPN tweet. That is it.
Xavier Breath
(3,825 posts)fat rolls for any other hidden contraband. There was likely a flask in there at some point, too. Yeesh.
Also, 'Guaranteed Rate Field?' My, but that does inspire the baseball romantic, eh?
MorbidButterflyTat
(1,962 posts)half a Subway sandwich she forgot about last week?
Floyd R. Turbo
(27,191 posts)SYFROYH
(34,193 posts)⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Floyd R. Turbo
(27,191 posts)sarisataka
(19,528 posts)One of the women who was shot at the Chicago White Sox game on Friday night, says she didn't bring the gun into Guaranteed Rate Field.
Her attorneys spoke out Tuesday and they said their client was sitting in the stands when she was hit by a bullet.
The attorneys, who said the woman is a season tickets holder, released a statement saying, "Our client underwent emergency medical treatment for a gunshot wound she received while attending a baseball game. She denies bringing a firearm into the stadium and further denies having anything to do with the discharge of a firearm at the stadium. We have reviewed photographic evidence and x-rays of our client's injuries with firearms and medical experts who confirm the gunshot wound our client sustained was not self-inflicted and was not the result of her accidentally discharging a firearm. We will continue investigating this matter further to pursue justice on behalf of our client who sustained serious personal injuries as a result of this shooting."
Evidence is also lacking as they further note no gunshot residue was found on her clothing and security footage showed she did not set off the metal detector when entering the stadium.
Sympthsical
(9,238 posts)So how did this story originate?
This is a weird one.
sarisataka
(19,528 posts)"Lady smuggles gun in her fat rolls" will get lots of attention. No facts needed, just "unnamed sources".
Obviously it worked as it appears to have started with an ESPN tweet (or whatever they are now) and was amplified by many news sources.
Sympthsical
(9,238 posts)I'm so curious to know who the sources were that ESPN was confident enough to run with that.
Or maybe, as happens frequently, the story was "too good to check"
underpants
(183,672 posts)Thanks for the info
MorbidButterflyTat
(1,962 posts)So who had the gun? And where is it now? There must have been dozens of witnesses. No one saw the shooter? Maybe he was invisible, or flew away, or disappeared into the space-time continuum, and now he's in the future, planting evidence against her...
I'd totally trust her and her lawyer.
sarisataka
(19,528 posts)But the police haven't said they found a gun, let alone in her possession, no GSR, she passed through a metal detector that was confirmed to be working...
As much as it pains me to admit, I am going to give weight to what her lawyer says.
Tweeted accusations are fine, I guess, but a shred of evidence to support the accusation would be nice.
Cha
(299,437 posts)LuckyCharms
(17,645 posts)Is she single?
underpants
(183,672 posts)My laugh of the day
Beetwasher.
(2,991 posts)Using the term loosely I presume
Cha
(299,437 posts)TY
former9thward
(32,415 posts)That is the only source for this story. The woman denies it and the police will not comment.
ExWhoDoesntCare
(4,741 posts)Couldn't get any dumber...
Did it not occur to this moron that a gun is not meant to be carried in that location, because the way fat can ooze around can disengage a safety, and cause a trigger to pull?
Now MLB will be wanding everyone getting into a park.
former9thward
(32,415 posts)She was hit with two bullets.
ExWhoDoesntCare
(4,741 posts)It can pull again.
former9thward
(32,415 posts)And this story is based on one person's tweet. It has no other source. The woman denies it. The Sox say there were no issues with the woman when she went through the entry gate (they have video) and the police have made no comments.
global1
(25,417 posts)A shooting inside the park. Lady(s) hit in the foot/leg. The other day the police say that the shot didn't come from outside the park.
Today - the owner of the team - Reinsdorf said in a televised news report that he talked with the police and the shot didn't come from within the park.
If you see the footage of the commotion in the stands when this happened - they were sitting pretty low in the stands - there didn't seem to be a vantage point to have a shot come from outside the park - especially if it hit at the foot or leg beneath the seats. Then we have the report that the lady that was shot - smuggled the gun in in her belly fat. Hmmmm.....
It just sounds like there is some sort of cover-up going on. I don't recall seeing the woman interviewed nor have they mentioned her name.
I would think it's in the best interest for the owner to say that the shot didn't come from within the park. The Sox are having a bad year. The worst thing that can happen this late in the season is to have people stop coming to the ballpark because they are afraid of getting shot - or that the feel that the security measures at the park are lax or faulty.
An already down year would just get worse with respect to attendance if that were the case.
Something just sounds fishy about this whole thing. Appears to be some sort of cover-up going on.
former9thward
(32,415 posts)Not just a tv camera swinging over that way after it happened. I agree something very fishy and some sort of cover up.