MINUTE ORDER as to Donald J. Trump

[brooklynite]

MINUTE ORDER as to DONALD J. TRUMP: It is hereby ORDERED that by 5:00 PM on August 7, 2023, Defendant shall file a response to the government's 10 Motion for Protective Order, stating Defendant's position on the Motion. If Defendant disagrees with any portion of the government's proposed Protective Order, ECF No. 10-1, his response shall include a revised version of that Protective Order with any modifications in redline. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 08/05/2023. (lcss)

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67656604/united-states-v-trump/

[viva la]

1. What could he answer?

I mean, it's not like he's even capable of shutting up, and his attorneys have no ability to keep him quiet. And if he's talking, he's insulting, threatening, whining, inciting.

[MOMFUDSKI]

2. I am loving the

onus put on his attorneys

[Mr.Bill]

5. First thing I thought,

well, she sure fucked up their weekend, didn't she?

[LetMyPeopleVote]

3. TFG's attorneys just filed a motion asking for three more days to respond to protective order

TFG is going to delay this case as long as possible

Link to tweet

[sakabatou]

6. Three days? Seriously?

*sigh* Three more days of TFG acting out like a fucking asshole.

[ExWhoDoesntCare]

7. This motion has nothing to do with scheduling the trial

This motion is a separate issue entirely. It's a delay on the motion, not the trial date.

She's set a hearing to decide the trial's start date, and the judge won't change it over this.

Really.

[orthoclad]

10. And it was granted by the judge. Aug 10

It's in the courtlistener link. We don't need Mux.

[orthoclad]

12. Correction. A PROPOSED order,

oppsed by the United States.

[Proposed] ORDER
Defendant has moved to extend the briefing schedule for the government’s Motion for a
Protective Order. (Doc. 10, the “Government’s Motion”). Upon consideration, Defendant’s
application is GRANTED.
Defendant shall respond to the Government’s Motion by August 10, 2023. A hearing will
be held on this matter on at in Courtroom 9.

Opposition to proposed order:
GOVERNMENT’S OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
The Government wants to provide discovery to the defendant. By his motion, the
defendant seeks to delay that process. The defendant’s motion should be denied.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.258149/gov.uscourts.dcd.258149.12.0_1.pdf

[Hekate]

13. The weekend doesn't count? I really think it should, in all fairness. Plus Monday, that's three.

[flying_wahini]

4. So it's like chess. Waiting for the next move.

How long can he keep kicking the can down the road?
What will be the straw that breaks the camels back? What will it take to get him to
Shut the f up?

[LetMyPeopleVote]

8. Jack Smith files a motion asking judge NOT to allow a Trump delay

Jack Smith rejects the need for delay

Link to tweet

Here is a link to the latest motion filed by Jack Smith
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.258149/gov.uscourts.dcd.258149.12.0_1.pdf

The defendant’s extension motion proposes unnecessary delay to normal order. The
defendant suggests that the delay “will enable Defendant to fully assess the Proposed Order and
advise the Court of applicable law.” ECF No. 11 at 1. Nothing prevents defense counsel from
doing just that on the schedule already ordered by the Court. To the extent defense counsel wants
to confer further, Government counsel is available at any time—evenings, weekends, or holidays.
And if the Court enters the proposed protective order and the defendant later is dissatisfied, the
defendant can seek to modify the order at any time.

[lastlib]

9. Motion to delay is DENIED....by order of lastlib........

(wonder if I carry any weight here..........?)

[LetMyPeopleVote]

11. "Government counsel is available at any time--evenings, weekends, or holidays."

Link to tweet