General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBehind the Scenes of Justice Alito's Unprecedented Wall Street Journal Pre-buttal
https://www.propublica.org/article/behind-scenes-alito-wall-street-journal-prebuttal-editorialAround midday on Friday, June 16, ProPublica reporters Justin Elliott and Josh Kaplan sent an email to Patricia McCabe, the Supreme Courts spokesperson, with questions for Justice Samuel Alito about a forthcoming story on his fishing trip to Alaska with a hedge fund billionaire.
We set a deadline of the following Tuesday at noon for a response.
Fifteen minutes later, McCabe called the reporters. It was an unusual moment in our dealings with the high courts press office, the first time any of its public information officers had spoken directly with the ProPublica journalists in the many months we have spent looking into the justices ethics and conduct. When we sent detailed questions to the court for our stories on Justice Clarence Thomas, McCabe responded with an email that said they had been passed on to the justice. There was no further word from her before those stories appeared, not even a statement that Thomas would have no comment.
The conversation about Alito was brisk and professional. McCabe said she had noticed a formatting issue with an email, and the reporters agreed to resend the 18 questions in a Word document. Kaplan and Elliott told McCabe they understood that this was a busy time at the court and that they were willing to extend the deadline if Alito needed more time.
Monday was a federal holiday, Juneteenth. On Tuesday, McCabe called the reporters to tell them Alito would not respond to our requests for comment but said we should not write that he declined to comment. (In the story, we wrote that she told us he would not be commenting.)
She asked when the story was likely to be published. Certainly not today, the reporters replied. Perhaps as soon as Wednesday.
*snip*
Midnight Writer
(21,888 posts)multigraincracker
(32,764 posts)on their building? Need some sunlight in there.
erronis
(15,488 posts)Last edited Sun Jun 25, 2023, 02:23 PM - Edit history (1)
I've had family members who have slowly slipped into full-blown dementia and/or Alzheimers. Sometimes their progress has stages of paranoia, lashing out, impulsiveness, loss of executive function.
Good thing the founding fathers thought of this eventuality and gave the US an exit path. NOT.
OneGrassRoot
(22,923 posts)So many things werent envisioned when the Constitution was written, including the average longevity greatly increasing. Lifetime terms are now MUCH longer.
plimsoll
(1,672 posts)And his responses to criticism have always been like this. Should we assume he was showing signs of dementia for his whole term. It's not dementia it's how autocrats respond when the peasants question their behavior.
He's a crook, the press have the receipts he's mad and wants to jump on the "fake news" bandwagon like every other GOP crook.
erronis
(15,488 posts)along with Alito's pre-buttal. The leak of the Dobb's decision came out a year ago. Same type of impulsiveness.
Please tell me what episode you're talking about from 15 years ago. Sure, he's probably been an asshole all of his life but it's now inflamed.
plimsoll
(1,672 posts)His minority opinion was that fully automatic sub-machines guns should be as easy to get as any other firearm. When questioned about it he attacked the questioner. He's just an ass, he may be getting worse, but it's not dementia. He's feeling the power and we peons should STFU.
ZonkerHarris
(24,325 posts)TeamProg
(6,393 posts)nuxvomica
(12,476 posts)He apparently likes to "get ahead of the story" and this tactic is practically an admission he leaked the Dobbs opinion.
malaise
(269,401 posts)moniss
(4,274 posts)I could tell that in order to see the average person Alito has a very, very long way to gaze down his nose.
malaise
(269,401 posts)These fascists are something else
Rec
EarnestPutz
(2,130 posts)"If Alito had sent his response to us, wed have asked some more questions. For example, Alito wrote that Supreme Court justices commonly interpreted the requirement to disclose gifts as not applying to accommodations and transportation for social events. We would have asked whether he meant to say it was common practice for justices to accept free vacations and private jet flights without disclosing them."
Boom! That left a mark.
Boomerproud
(7,991 posts)"OH, SCOTUS. so sorry about the font on the email."
UTUSN
(70,814 posts)of calling more attention to it by responding.
JudyM
(29,294 posts)So classy and still bit alito in the ass.