Tue May 16, 2023, 11:45 AM
Tommy Carcetti (42,275 posts)
BREAKING NEWS: DOJ promises to give Durham Report "exactly the amount of attention it deserves"
Following the release of a report by Special Counsel John Durham into the FBI investigation of Donald Trump’s connections to Russia during the 2016 US Presidential campaign, the Department of Justice vowed to give the report “exactly the amount of attention it so, so justly deserves.”
Durham—who was appointed as Special Counsel during the Trump Administration by then-Attorney General Bill Barr to probe the FBI’s investigation of Trump’s Russia ties in 2016—issued his report on Monday. The report issued harsh criticisms against the FBI’s bases for launching its inquiry against Trump, although it did not make any recommendations for any further criminal indictments of any individuals. Durham did prosecute two individuals during the course of his investigation for process-related offenses; both trials resulted in swift acquittals. “When we received [the Durham Report], the first thing I heard from my superiors was, ‘This is going straight to the circular file!’” noted one DOJ official. “Er, um…circulating file,” the official quickly corrected himself with a nervous laugh. “You know, a file that, uh, circulates around the office, so everyone can get a chance to read it and be all like, ‘Oh! Wow! This is such a well-written report!’ I mean…that works, right? Yes? No?” Critics of the Durham Report have criticized it as a blatant effort to whitewash concerns about the relationship the 2016 Trump campaign appeared to have with numerous individuals and incidents associated with the Russian government, including a campaign meeting with Russian officials offering to provide dirt on Hillary Clinton, Trump’s campaign manager providing Kremlin oligarchs with polling data, and Trump himself on live television appearing to encourage Russian hackers to infiltrate Clinton’s campaign computer data. Some within the DOJ, however, were slightly more charitable towards Durham’s efforts. “John’s like one of those terminally ill Make-a-Wish kids whose dream it is to be a major league baseball player,” one source said. “So they give him a uniform, bring him out onto the field, soft toss him a few balls during batting practice, the whole shebang. I mean, no way in hell do they actually bring him into a real game--because that would be absurd--but you do what you have to do to make him feel good about himself in what is otherwise a terrible, terrible situation for him.” Others angled for more of a constructive criticism type of approach. “Four years and seven million dollars later, and what did we get?” a DOJ official said. “Well, we got a grand total of two trials where the respective juries took about as much time to decide the cases were nonsense as one would take to watch an episode of HGTV’s House Hunters. So, in other words, you had a grand total of 24 people who were deprived of the opportunity to see if John and Sally from Omaha decide to go with the suburban new build, or that classic craftsman right in the heart of the city. And that’s a shame. But, hey, I guess the man tried. Can’t fault him there, right?” A few in the DOJ went so far as to compliment Durham’s choice of font for his report, and praised him on his spelling and grammar proofreading abilities. “306 pages and not once—not once!--does he end a single sentence with a preposition,” one individual remarked. “Sure, the ultimate legacy of Durham’s report may be that it was nothing more than a bald-faced attempt to re-write history and manufacture an alternate narrative that a major party’s presidential campaign wasn’t actually blatantly corrupted by a hostile foreign power. But at least his ninth-grade English teacher has something to be proud of…err, I mean…something of which to be proud.” At least one high-ranking official within the DOJ went on record finding that the Durham Report could prove very useful in the end. “I promise you this, I fully intend give the Durham Report the proper weight that it deserves,” the official said. “I mean that literally. It will be a wonderful paper weight for my desk. The stupid thing works absolutely beautifully for that purpose.” DETAILS AT ELEVEN ![]()
|
19 replies, 3028 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Tommy Carcetti | May 16 | OP |
MustBeTheBooz | May 16 | #1 | |
underpants | May 16 | #2 | |
gab13by13 | May 16 | #3 | |
Marcuse | May 16 | #6 | |
MayReasonRule | May 16 | #13 | |
Marcuse | May 16 | #19 | |
erronis | May 16 | #4 | |
MissMillie | May 16 | #8 | |
erronis | May 16 | #10 | |
Wounded Bear | May 16 | #11 | |
erronis | May 16 | #12 | |
calimary | May 16 | #5 | |
ExWhoDoesntCare | May 16 | #7 | |
NotVeryImportant | May 16 | #9 | |
Codifer | May 16 | #14 | |
Hekate | May 16 | #15 | |
Tommy Carcetti | May 16 | #16 | |
Hekate | May 16 | #18 | |
ornotna | May 16 | #17 |
Response to Tommy Carcetti (Original post)
Tue May 16, 2023, 11:51 AM
MustBeTheBooz (211 posts)
1. K&R
That was a great read! Well done.
![]() |
Response to Tommy Carcetti (Original post)
Tue May 16, 2023, 11:55 AM
underpants (176,754 posts)
2. Stealing this part.
Four years and seven million dollars later, and what did we get?” a DOJ official said. “Well, we got a grand total of two trials where the respective juries took about as much time to decide the cases were nonsense as one would take to watch an episode of HGTV’s House Hunters. So, in other words, you had a grand total of 24 people who were deprived of the opportunity to see if John and Sally from Omaha decide to go with the suburban new build, or that classic craftsman right in the heart of the city. And that’s a shame. But, hey, I guess the man tried. Can’t fault him there, right?
|
Response to Tommy Carcetti (Original post)
Tue May 16, 2023, 12:22 PM
gab13by13 (16,338 posts)
3. It's not a fucking joke,
did Durham include a report on the Italian government's information of possible Trump financial crimes?
|
Response to Marcuse (Reply #6)
Tue May 16, 2023, 02:31 PM
MayReasonRule (923 posts)
13. That's The Punchline. The Report Is The Joke.
![]() |
Response to Tommy Carcetti (Original post)
Tue May 16, 2023, 01:35 PM
erronis (12,949 posts)
4. Great piece. Can anyone supply a link to this?
I'm afraid I don't subscribe to any cable channels. Oh, wait - I can let Alphabet/google do my searching for me while it's searching my pockets.
|
Response to erronis (Reply #4)
Tue May 16, 2023, 01:54 PM
MissMillie (37,464 posts)
8. I don't either. A link would be helpful.
Or is the OP an original work from the person posting?
|
Response to MissMillie (Reply #8)
Tue May 16, 2023, 02:15 PM
erronis (12,949 posts)
10. I wouldn't put it past Tommie_Carcetti to pull this one of all by s/he/it-self.
I'm getting up there. Don't know how to assume genders/identities. Do have some relatives that go by "them" (which seems silly to me, but what do I know.)
Maybe DU should enforce a gender-neutral policy. No gender-identifiable pronouns. (Just kidding!) |
Response to erronis (Reply #10)
Tue May 16, 2023, 02:16 PM
Wounded Bear (56,005 posts)
11. The picture at the bottom is the only indication he usually includes to say...
it is satire.
![]() |
Response to Wounded Bear (Reply #11)
Tue May 16, 2023, 02:20 PM
erronis (12,949 posts)
12. Thank you - and great satire. The best leaves the reader wondering
until maybe a bit of denouement at the end.
From what I've read, most conservatives don't get it - even when presented with some 'sarcasm' indicator. |
Response to Tommy Carcetti (Original post)
Tue May 16, 2023, 01:35 PM
calimary (75,921 posts)
5. Oooooooh, they're making jokes about him now...
That’s usually a sign that it’s the beginning of the end.
|
Response to Tommy Carcetti (Original post)
Tue May 16, 2023, 01:49 PM
ExWhoDoesntCare (1,178 posts)
7. The snark has hunted well on this mission
That is some serious
![]() |
Response to Tommy Carcetti (Original post)
Tue May 16, 2023, 02:02 PM
NotVeryImportant (330 posts)
9. Good stuff.
Response to Tommy Carcetti (Original post)
Tue May 16, 2023, 02:46 PM
Codifer (399 posts)
14. Yeah,
I would go with the Classic Craftsman in the city.
|
Response to Tommy Carcetti (Original post)
Tue May 16, 2023, 02:49 PM
Hekate (84,062 posts)
15. Tommy, ya just gotta let us know up front when you're competing with The Onion
Response to Hekate (Reply #15)
Tue May 16, 2023, 03:59 PM
Tommy Carcetti (42,275 posts)
16. I actually did once see if they accepted submissions.
Alas, they do not.
|
Response to Tommy Carcetti (Reply #16)
Tue May 16, 2023, 06:48 PM
Hekate (84,062 posts)
18. Their loss -- You're good
Response to Tommy Carcetti (Original post)
Tue May 16, 2023, 04:05 PM
ornotna (10,491 posts)
17. Nice
Excellent job Florida man. 😎
|