Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
57 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
tom nichols thinks we're over reacting calling it fascism. (Original Post) mopinko Apr 2023 OP
That's what the Germans initially said, it's just a fad, it really isn't that bad and Hitler rose .. RKP5637 Apr 2023 #1
Please check a dictionary......... DENVERPOPS Apr 2023 #28
Why in the world did you send this to me??? n/t RKP5637 Apr 2023 #54
I am not sure RKP DENVERPOPS Apr 2023 #55
Hi, all is well. I was really confused as I was trying to understand ... Thanks for RKP5637 Apr 2023 #56
Hitler's Emergency Edicts were "temporary" or so he said. no_hypocrisy Apr 2023 #2
We now know that it has been decades in the making, funded by dark money and our enemies. Irish_Dem Apr 2023 #3
it's highly organized, just not out in the open. mopinko Apr 2023 #5
Let's be honest, they bought a big chunk of all three branches of US government. Irish_Dem Apr 2023 #8
Senator Whitehouse outlined the plan on Lawrence O'Donnell's show. The Powell Memo... keep_left Apr 2023 #37
Thanks to you and Sen. Whitehouse. oasis Apr 2023 #51
You're welcome. keep_left Apr 2023 #53
his is a long thread full of bs. mopinko Apr 2023 #4
Nichols: "...at some point, there has to be some kind of minimal... dchill Apr 2023 #6
Then what should it be called? nt GuppyGal Apr 2023 #7
fascism lite? mopinko Apr 2023 #9
the word "fascism" has been soooo overused... WarGamer Apr 2023 #10
how do you define the word? mopinko Apr 2023 #12
Sure... I'll give a brief summary. WarGamer Apr 2023 #15
A good definition is great, but plimsoll Apr 2023 #25
So you're saying that... WarGamer Apr 2023 #30
I agree that they have meaning, plimsoll Apr 2023 #40
We'll just agree to disagree. WarGamer Apr 2023 #43
It's fine. plimsoll Apr 2023 #49
and slightly off topic... WarGamer Apr 2023 #33
Amen to that. plimsoll Apr 2023 #41
Yes, but Communist & Socialist equals liberal has worked wonders for the Right. hadEnuf Apr 2023 #24
Like I said... WarGamer Apr 2023 #34
Robert Paxton, a historian and political scientist who specializes in fascism Poiuyt Apr 2023 #52
Where has he been the last seven years? LiberalFighter Apr 2023 #11
Well Said, Mo!! Cha Apr 2023 #13
No. He thinks it's dangerously counterproductive to call EVERYTHING fascism. Hortensis Apr 2023 #14
Hmmmm.... SouthernDem4ever Apr 2023 #16
Assumed that was implicit in "greedy RW" powers, but yes. Hortensis Apr 2023 #18
There may be a few greedy powers who think that way SouthernDem4ever Apr 2023 #42
Precisely. WarGamer Apr 2023 #17
:) Precisely, and so beautifully concisely. Hortensis Apr 2023 #19
define modern. mopinko Apr 2023 #38
Like I wrote above... WarGamer Apr 2023 #45
conservatives dont believe those things now, mopinko Apr 2023 #46
and you can call it what YOU like, mopinko Apr 2023 #47
there we agree... there certainly IS a threat to our American form of Democracy. WarGamer Apr 2023 #48
Straw man Nasruddin Apr 2023 #27
The U.S.A. has never been anything but "fascist light," the "light" as in beer... hunter Apr 2023 #50
"At some point there has to be..." - no, there really doesn't. NullTuples Apr 2023 #20
Sorry but he's full of shit. onecaliberal Apr 2023 #21
Don't kid youself! What we are seeing on the right is highly organized. There are a large number flashman13 Apr 2023 #22
"starts with telling ppl overreacting" UTUSN Apr 2023 #23
Tom Nichols is an idiot Marius25 Apr 2023 #26
You got that right. roamer65 Apr 2023 #31
+1!!🕯️🕊 Cha Apr 2023 #44
There won't be any appointed MAGAt governors of the blue states. roamer65 Apr 2023 #29
Whatever it is.. liberal N proud Apr 2023 #32
rofl... WarGamer Apr 2023 #35
+1 exactly bronxiteforever Apr 2023 #36
Here's a usage from a recent book on law plus related practices in the Jim Crow era 4dog Apr 2023 #39
What Tom Nichols REALLY thinks and says: Hortensis Apr 2023 #57

RKP5637

(67,112 posts)
1. That's what the Germans initially said, it's just a fad, it really isn't that bad and Hitler rose ..
Sun Apr 16, 2023, 06:15 PM
Apr 2023

DENVERPOPS

(8,893 posts)
28. Please check a dictionary.........
Sun Apr 16, 2023, 08:31 PM
Apr 2023

The simplest definition of FASCISM, is the merger of Government and Corporations...

While you are in the Dictionary, look up the definitions of:

Insurrection

Sedition

CABAL

Dogma

Cult

DENVERPOPS

(8,893 posts)
55. I am not sure RKP
Mon Apr 17, 2023, 12:25 PM
Apr 2023

I will try to find the comment I had intended to send it to!!!!!!!! Sorry, and thx for the heads up......Be well!
How embarrassing..........

RKP5637

(67,112 posts)
56. Hi, all is well. I was really confused as I was trying to understand ... Thanks for
Mon Apr 17, 2023, 12:29 PM
Apr 2023

getting back to me!

mopinko

(70,382 posts)
5. it's highly organized, just not out in the open.
Sun Apr 16, 2023, 06:36 PM
Apr 2023

they bought f’ing scotus.

i think tom should have a long chat w sen whitehouse.

Irish_Dem

(48,018 posts)
8. Let's be honest, they bought a big chunk of all three branches of US government.
Sun Apr 16, 2023, 06:46 PM
Apr 2023

Illegally installed Trump into the WH.

And appear to have a big chunk of the DOJ and FBI as well.

Congress and the Supreme Court which is now just a corrupt junta.

Hell how much of our intelligence community is on Putin's payroll?

I have been saying this for quite some time and gotten pushback.

Now people are finally paying attention.

keep_left

(1,799 posts)
37. Senator Whitehouse outlined the plan on Lawrence O'Donnell's show. The Powell Memo...
Sun Apr 16, 2023, 09:16 PM
Apr 2023

...in 1971 was really the start of the the drive for hegemony on the far right. I first recall seeing the mask slip when Clinton defeated GHW Bush. Immediately following that loss, the neocon faction of the Republican party became utterly enraged, and it was clear that many of them really believed they deserved to rule forever. Not long after that came the rise of Newt Gingrich, who more than anyone is responsible for the rise of what I call the "wreckers": those who make politics a completely zero-sum game, who believe no compromise is possible, and who always seem to leave a trail of destruction in their wake for others to clean up.

Here's a clip from the show.

dchill

(38,623 posts)
6. Nichols: "...at some point, there has to be some kind of minimal...
Sun Apr 16, 2023, 06:44 PM
Apr 2023

...competence and organization involved." Do tell! Where? When? How likely is that before the ethics-free SCOTUS signs all our rights and freedoms away, trading them for yacht trips?

WarGamer

(12,511 posts)
10. the word "fascism" has been soooo overused...
Sun Apr 16, 2023, 06:48 PM
Apr 2023

That actual scholarly experts on the subject use the term "small-f fascism" to describe the current usage meaning "anyone who I don't like".

Words have meanings.

99% of the time, the word you're looking for is...

Authoritarian. Sometimes Totalitarian.

Example: "The authoritarian governor of Florida".

WarGamer

(12,511 posts)
15. Sure... I'll give a brief summary.
Sun Apr 16, 2023, 07:26 PM
Apr 2023

Post WW1, an Italian political philosopher came up with the term "Fascism"... I forgot his name off the top of my head. This guy influenced Mussolini and even was the ghost writer for Mussolini in his Book about fascism.

Mussolini styled his form and philosophy of government around this concept. Fascism is... Mussolini.

It's like Nazism. If you don't have an NDSAP party ID number issued pre-1945, you're not a Nazi.

Fascism, as defined by Mussolini... is (to summarize)

https://sjsu.edu/faculty/wooda/2B-HUM/Readings/The-Doctrine-of-Fascism.pdf

Mussolini defined fascism as being a left-wing collectivistic ideology in opposition to socialism, liberalism, democracy and individualism

"Anti-individualistic, the fascist conception of life stresses the importance of the State and accepts the individual only in so far as his interests coincide with those of the State, which stands for the conscience and the universal will of man as a historic entity.... Liberalism denied the State in the name of the individual; fascism reasserts the rights of the State as expressing the real essence of the individual. And if liberty is to be the attribute of living men and not abstract dummies invented by individualistic liberalism, then fascism stands for liberty, and for the only liberty worth having, the liberty of the State and of the individual within the State. The fascist conception of the State is all-embracing; outside of it no human or spiritual values can exist, much less have value. Thus understood, fascism… interprets, develops, and potentiates the whole life of a people.... Fascism is therefore opposed to that form of democracy which equates a nation to the majority, lowering it to the level of the largest number; but it is the purest form of democracy if the nation be considered – as it should be – from the point of view of quality rather than quantity, as an idea, the mightiest because the most ethical, the most coherent, the truest, expressing itself in a people as the conscience and will of the few, if not, indeed, of one, and tending to express itself in the conscience and will of the mass, of the whole group ethnically molded by natural and historical conditions into a nation, advancing as one conscience and one will, along the self-same line of development and spiritual formation. Not a race, or a geographically defined region, but a people, historically perpetuating itself; a multitude unified by an idea and imbued with the will to live, the will to power, self-consciousness, personality...."

Most scholars hold that fascism as a social movement employs elements from the political left, but many conclude that fascism eventually allies with the political right, especially after attaining state power. This is even more complicated when discussing Nazism, which as a socio-political movement began as a form of National Socialism, but altered its character once Hitler was handed state power in Germany. See: Fascism and ideology. A minority of scholars and political commentators argue that fascism is a form of corporatist socialism similar to that in other countries with extensive state regulation of the economy. See Fascism and ideology and Economics of fascism.


And please note... when it is noted that Fascism is "Anti-Liberal" that isn't the 21st Century of Liberalism. The classic definition of liberalism is limited gov't, religious freedom and respect for the free market.

Just because someone is anti-Democracy doesn't mean they're fascist. EVERY single form of Authoritarian philosophy is anti-Democratic.

plimsoll

(1,672 posts)
25. A good definition is great, but
Sun Apr 16, 2023, 08:21 PM
Apr 2023
when it is noted that Fascism is "Anti-Liberal" that isn't the 21st Century of Liberalism. The classic definition of liberalism is limited gov't, religious freedom and respect for the free market.

Is more a 18th Century definition, sure "progressive" may have been more current for what a 21st century person would recognize as liberal, but it's often the ultra conservatives who use that definition of liberal in Europe today and did in the 1930s.

Both Mussolini and Hitler were not only rabidly anti-communist, but anti-trade union, anti-democratic socialism virtually every left adjacent economic philosophy. They used the language of socialism publicly, but the meetings for the faithful and their own writings always told a very different story.

Fascism doesn't have the impact we would like, but Authoritarian has no impact and a significant portion of the right has openly expressed disdain for democracy.

It's really time to stop playing Godwins law games and find a phrase that explains the behavior. Behaviorally the Freedom caucus, MAGA folks and particularly the Christian Dominionists are so close to fascism, that saying they aren't starts looking intellectually dishonest.

WarGamer

(12,511 posts)
30. So you're saying that...
Sun Apr 16, 2023, 08:45 PM
Apr 2023

Even though words mean things... just come up with the most powerful adjective available to label the political opponent?

And your last paragraph...

Is wrong.

Fascists wouldn't approve of any religious observance, 2A rights or private property rights. And fascism certainly doesn't like a free market.

I mean... I don't really care. Call them space aliens. Or call them Whigs.

But the reality is... people call their opponents fascists, nazis and commies because they're seeking the most inflammatory term to paint their opponent.

It's shallow and lazy debate.

Words have meaning.

plimsoll

(1,672 posts)
40. I agree that they have meaning,
Sun Apr 16, 2023, 09:33 PM
Apr 2023

But the Christian Dominionists meet most academics definition of Fascist, however painful that is for us to admit.

The 20th century Fascists did approve of religion, the Italian Fascists and Falangists in Spain were both overtly and openly Pro Catholic. There was a Protestant minister who tried to meld his denomination into the Nazi movement. That failed primarily because much of the early Nazi support came from Bavaria which was heavily Catholic. If you want to say they don't allow diversity of religion that may be true, but again the Christian Dominionists don't seem particularly keen on other peoples religions either.

I'm not saying we should be lazy, and for years I advocated cautious use of rhetoric. But as early as 2003 the Christian Dominionists were saying and doing alarming things. the intervening 2 decades has done nothing to tone down their vitriol or the threats they are prepared to make. I don't care what you want to call them, but sadly the fascist label is as close as you'll get to something that conveys the threat and danger to a civil society that they pose.

WarGamer

(12,511 posts)
43. We'll just agree to disagree.
Sun Apr 16, 2023, 09:52 PM
Apr 2023

Authoritarian is more accurate.

And Fascism certainly wouldn't be in favor of a 1st or 2nd Amendment or private property ownership, free market or capitalism as the right currently embraces.

Fascism bottom line, individual rights are secondary to the power of the State.

plimsoll

(1,672 posts)
49. It's fine.
Sun Apr 16, 2023, 10:32 PM
Apr 2023

1st amendment you’re right.

2nd amendment is trickier. The ownership and practice with firearms was encouraged, for non-Jews.

As you said the Nazis in particular were a bundle of weird. The one unifying principal you could point to was a subjugation ( you could say domination) of out groups.

WarGamer

(12,511 posts)
33. and slightly off topic...
Sun Apr 16, 2023, 08:52 PM
Apr 2023

The Russian revolution was actually the primary factor shaping the history of the 20th Century.

The Bolsheviks started a societal tsunami that swept across Europe. Fascism and Nazism were BOTH reactionary movements to Bolshevism and later Communism.

So, of course they were anti-Communist. They were opposing movements.

Both ended up being authoritarian movements that were responsible for 100 million deaths in the 20th Century.

I'm happy both are relegated to the trash heap of history.

hadEnuf

(2,224 posts)
24. Yes, but Communist & Socialist equals liberal has worked wonders for the Right.
Sun Apr 16, 2023, 08:20 PM
Apr 2023

Why are we so worried about using exact definitions when it comes to them?

They are Fascists. Repeat it often.

Poiuyt

(18,135 posts)
52. Robert Paxton, a historian and political scientist who specializes in fascism
Sun Apr 16, 2023, 11:39 PM
Apr 2023

now calls it fascism:

Trump's incitement of the invasion of the Capitol on January 6, 2020 removes my objection to the fascist label. His open encouragement of civic violence to overturn an election crosses a red line. The label now seems not just acceptable but necessary. It is made even more plausible by comparison with a milestone on Europe's road to fascism—an openly fascist demonstration in Paris during the night of February 6, 1934.

https://www.newsweek.com/robert-paxton-trump-fascist-1560652


So does Ruth Ben-Ghiat

It’s time to accept that the GOP, which was complicit with Trump's Jan. 6 attempted authoritarian takeover, has become a party that furthers Fascist values and practices. That means the hate crimes that have skyrocketed in America since 2016 will likely continue to expand.

https://lucid.substack.com/p/what-is-fascism


And Jason Stanley, author of How Fascism Works: The Politics of Us and Them

STANLEY: So fascism is a cult of the leader who promises national restoration in the face of supposed humiliation by minorities, liberals and immigrants. He represents the cities as corrupt, filled with foreigners and disease, and the heartland as the true nation that he represents. And then he takes over a political party, transforms them into a cult of the leader and says only he can deal with the problem.

So we're - we've seen his election campaign focus on Black Lives Matter, on a minority social justice movement. We've seen him promise patriotic education in a second term - all sorts of tactics that we ideologically associate with far-right ultranationalism, i.e., fascism.

https://www.npr.org/2020/11/21/937638178/-how-fascism-works-author-on-trump-s-attempts-to-overturn-election-results


Now, what's happening with the GOP here in America may not be exactly like what happened in Europe in the 1920s and 30s. Call it American Fascism or neo-fascism if you'd like. But there's more going on than just authoritarianism.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
14. No. He thinks it's dangerously counterproductive to call EVERYTHING fascism.
Sun Apr 16, 2023, 07:15 PM
Apr 2023

Important words have important, powerful meanings that need to be protected so they can be used to help people understand threats and solutions and take the right stands.

These days eager mudslingers on both right and left grab the word "fascism" to hurl at each other, like rock, mud, rotten melon rind, whatever it actually is doesn't matter as long as it's available and sounds bad.

There are different kinds of RW authoritarianism, of various degrees of extremism, and fascism is only one of them, albeit one of the very worst.

Our RW opponents here are not all fascists, and that's a mercy.

tRump's probably a sorta wannabe fascist because he loves the idea of people having to adore him as embodiment of "the state" they pledge to serve. His MAGAs are generally authoritarian personalities and ready to obey and worship, less so others who vote for him. I took a look at Tom's entries, and agree with the poster who thinks he may be too "lazy" to commit to what it would take to impose on others, though. Also too cowardly to try.

I think there's virtually no chance McConnell and most of his wing are the slightest bit interested in making the giant investments of wealth and attention to impose and maintain fascist control on society, to change culture to serving the state over individual rights.

Even the most greedy RWers, authoritarian and otherwise, in other nations are typically happy to let people live mostly free and get along as they choose, just coming down on those who cross them and dissidents who threaten their control.

It's of course necessary to know who your enemies and your potential allies are, and who theirs are also.

SouthernDem4ever

(6,617 posts)
16. Hmmmm....
Sun Apr 16, 2023, 07:27 PM
Apr 2023

I would like to take issue with this statement:

Even the most greedy RW authoritarians are usually happy to let people live mostly free and get along as they choose, just punishing and persecuting those who cross them and dissidents who threaten their control.


I would rather it say:

"Even the most greedy RW authoritarians are usually happy let people live to serve them with little or no pay, no healthcare, no labor laws, no bodily rights, no civil rights, no dissent, and no path to justice"

I could have added more but just wanted to point out your over-simplification.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
18. Assumed that was implicit in "greedy RW" powers, but yes.
Sun Apr 16, 2023, 07:49 PM
Apr 2023

In actual practice they actually find it most profitable, and by far easiest, to keep workers working and not force people to revolt, allowing a functional stability. After all, really unhappy workers have a way of not showing up for work and eventually burning the factory down instead. They also more often than not maintain a weak voting system that doesn't threaten their control.

SouthernDem4ever

(6,617 posts)
42. There may be a few greedy powers who think that way
Sun Apr 16, 2023, 09:43 PM
Apr 2023

But the rest of them will push everything to the limit until there has to be bloodshed to change things. Then the cycle repeats. Social media has added a new twist though as it keeps people very stupid - that and RW media but that too has a shelf life.

WarGamer

(12,511 posts)
17. Precisely.
Sun Apr 16, 2023, 07:35 PM
Apr 2023

Fascism, by definition, runs counter to modern conservative philosophy including limited gov't, religious freedom, private property rights and individual freedoms including the 2A.

Like I said in my other post... 99% of the time, when people say fascist... they should have used the word authoritarian.

WarGamer

(12,511 posts)
45. Like I wrote above...
Sun Apr 16, 2023, 09:58 PM
Apr 2023

True Fascism, let's call if "Capital F" Fascism... the OG Mussolini version

1) Wouldn't recognize individual rights as those in the Constitution. No 1A or 2A.

2) No freedom of religion

3) No free financial markets.

4) No capitalism except for the most wealthy.

Fascism means State control over all aspects of society.

So the belief that a fascist would approve of the US Constitution or the US economy or US financial system is pretty silly.

Fascist equals total state control.

mopinko

(70,382 posts)
46. conservatives dont believe those things now,
Sun Apr 16, 2023, 10:08 PM
Apr 2023

and have only given them lip service in my lifetime.
of course they dont approve, they’ve been chipping away at it for my whole life.

and if controlling what you read, what your kids learn, and what you do w your own body isnt enough, and rich ppl who own most of the govt and the damn scotus, what are you waiting for? what do you need to see?

mopinko

(70,382 posts)
47. and you can call it what YOU like,
Sun Apr 16, 2023, 10:12 PM
Apr 2023

but it’s a threat to american democracy. the only question is how high the body count will be.
when the vast majority want something done about guns, but instead govts move in the opposite direction, while blood runs in the street, it isnt democracy.
whatever the hell it is, it must be stopped.
cuz there rly could be a day when it’s too late.

Nasruddin

(756 posts)
27. Straw man
Sun Apr 16, 2023, 08:24 PM
Apr 2023

Anyway, there may be diffs that will get you an A in your Poli Sci or Hist Mod Europe class, but as far
as political action goes, what are the differences that make a difference? How would one act differently
when one has realized one unpleasant social movement is authoritarian, monarchist, fascist, or whatever else
undesired system?

hunter

(38,353 posts)
50. The U.S.A. has never been anything but "fascist light," the "light" as in beer...
Sun Apr 16, 2023, 11:02 PM
Apr 2023

... and something worse for anyone not white or not the right flavor of "white."

It's become something more complicated these days now that previously favored flavors of white people, those who always appreciated the light hand of their masters upon the reigns, begin to understand they are no longer considered all that "special" by their fascist masters in this twenty first century world economy.

The entire white suburban automobile-centric nuclear family lifestyle was created by a fascist state to maximize profits and minimize political resistance. The "freedoms" of this culture were an illusion, as most any non-white person always knew, and many white political dissidents soon discovered.

This U.S.A. facism may have preferable to more heavy-handed political ideologies practiced elsewhere around the world in the twentieth century, but it was never the "good old days," or even a path to better days, whatever Walter Cronkite was claiming on the television news machine.

My mom and dad are white beatnik artists and pacifists who never rocked the boat too much (although they did at times get a little close) who retired on my dad's day-job union pension. My dad marvels at his pension sometimes. He knows my mom worked harder, fought harder, and raised her children to be fierce, yet her social security check are not their primary income.

Had my parents been "angry black people" or angry LGBTQ people, or angry Communist people, or merely uppity independent women, they'd have been shit out of luck. When the baby souls were being sorted out in heaven my dad drew the nice straight white guy born in California card. Like winning the lottery.

In the city I grew up in an eccentric white couple with too many kids might buy a house in a bankrupt housing development, but that simply wasn't in the cards for anyone who wasn't white with a secure union job like my dad's, or white with cash in hand.

NullTuples

(6,017 posts)
20. "At some point there has to be..." - no, there really doesn't.
Sun Apr 16, 2023, 08:09 PM
Apr 2023

Disrupting and dismantling a highly organized system like, I dunno...a functional government...only requires the will to do so. That's how so-called social contracts work, something that both our CIA and Russia's KGB knew all too well. Oh, hey - Valimir Putin was in the KGB, wasn't he? What a funny coincidence!

Anyway, it's far easier, cheaper and faster to throw chaos into an organized system and break it than it is to build something functional to replace it. But that's the part Tom seems to be missing. Fascism doesn't have to be functional as a government, it only has to be able to terrorize people to hang on to power.

flashman13

(687 posts)
22. Don't kid youself! What we are seeing on the right is highly organized. There are a large number
Sun Apr 16, 2023, 08:12 PM
Apr 2023

of rich and very intelligent people behind it all. I refer you to Senator Whitehouse's series, The Scheme. The right has been working toward this SCOTUS for the last 50 years. Don't be distracted by the useful idiots like Jordon, Graham, Cruz, et. al. They are just creators of chaos as a distraction. There really are many capable, though bent, people behind the curtain. Many of them are clearly Fascists.

 

Marius25

(3,213 posts)
26. Tom Nichols is an idiot
Sun Apr 16, 2023, 08:23 PM
Apr 2023

I'm Jewish. Not only is what Republicans are doing fascism, it's straight out of the Nazi Germany playbook.

roamer65

(36,748 posts)
31. You got that right.
Sun Apr 16, 2023, 08:48 PM
Apr 2023

There WILL NOT be a repeat of Nazi Germany in this country if I have anything to do with it.

roamer65

(36,748 posts)
29. There won't be any appointed MAGAt governors of the blue states.
Sun Apr 16, 2023, 08:45 PM
Apr 2023

Take that to the bank, folks.

That position would be a death sentence.

Enuff said.

4dog

(505 posts)
39. Here's a usage from a recent book on law plus related practices in the Jim Crow era
Sun Apr 16, 2023, 09:25 PM
Apr 2023

"t is unclear how best to describe the United States in the Jim Crow era, when a quasi-fascist polity was embedded within a putative democracy. Some scholars, drawing on the example of South Africa in the time of apartheid, use the term “Herrenvolk democracy” to describe a situation in which parts of the population enjoy full democratic rights while others are entirely excluded."

Review by Eric Foner of By Hands Now Known: Jim Crow’s Legal Executioners
by Margaret A. Burnham in New York Review of Books. Sorry, paywall not easily evaded.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
57. What Tom Nichols REALLY thinks and says:
Mon Apr 17, 2023, 04:59 PM
Apr 2023
Don't keep devaluing the word "fascist."

Don't wear out the ability of your fellow citizens to hear that word and be alarmed. (That's already happening. It's like "woke," it's becoming meaningless.)

The day may come - and soon - when we'll *need* that word. Conserve it.

NOW: Just WHO need that warning misunderstood, denigrated, and ignored while they spend billions teaching people it means "Democrat"?

His warning is given BECAUSE of the surge in fascistic leaders and sympathies. Among SOME on the right.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»tom nichols thinks we're ...