Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)
1. Agreed. Just threatening one shouldn't be sufficient to require 60 votes.
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 11:51 AM
Nov 2012

Either nuke it entirely or at least require the threat to be backed up by an ACTUAL filibuster. Sanders was the last one to actually filibuster and he only made it 8 hours.

Puzzledtraveller

(5,937 posts)
2. I agree, they should have to speak continuously on the floor
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 11:55 AM
Nov 2012

like good ole Mr. Smith goes to Washington. That's how always thought it was supposed to be.

SoCalDem

(103,856 posts)
6. 51-49 should be back to being THE RULE
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:58 PM
Nov 2012

or perhaps give the minority 1 filibuster per session.. make them choose when it's important enough.. Men love their sports analogies.. is there any sport that allows unlimited "time outs"?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fix the Filibuster, damni...