General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI know this is not allowed, but I am absolutely DISGUSTED
with NYC Mayor Eric Adams (D). JFC, leave your fucking christian viewpoints at home and don't tell me you can't govern without bring your damn GOD into the equation.
Dont tell me about no separation of church and state. State is the body, church is the heart. You take the heart out of the body, the body dies, Adams said at the main branch of the New York Public Library, where religious leaders from around the city were seated.
I cant separate my belief because Im an elected official. When I walk, I walk with God. When I talk, I talk with God. When I put policies in place, I put them in with a God-like approach to them thats who I am, he said.
I ... will always be a child of God, and I wont apologize about being a child of God, he added.
Scrivener7
(52,062 posts)Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)Not that I'm in charge, but ... yeah. This was atrocious.
If you're getting spanked for saying so, I'll go down with your proverbial ship, FAC.
Ferrets are Cool
(21,334 posts)Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)50 Shades Of Blue
(10,632 posts)Delphinus
(12,028 posts)me as well.
NewHendoLib
(60,303 posts)Bettie
(16,732 posts)comes from both sides.
Have your religion, believe in it, use it in your life, but in the end, it isn't everyone's belief, so it doesn't belong in government.
Caliman73
(11,767 posts)No one is saying that he can't be a "child of god", just don't impose your beliefs or "having to believe" on anyone. I was a believer and now I am not. My morals, ethics, and behavior have not changed (except I don't go to church anymore). I am not out killing, stealing, hurting others, etc... not because "god will punish me" but because I do not want to create a world where that is acceptable. Do I have the impulse to hurt people? Yes. I am human. I get angry, especially when someone else is being hurtful. However, I refrain from hurting others because it doesn't resolve the problem and just causes more pain.
You can have morality and law without religion and the Constitution actually demands it.
BlueWaveNeverEnd
(9,517 posts)BOSSHOG
(38,754 posts)I think its fair to say that organized theocrats will not stop in their attempts to get their way in the land of the free. Okay. Lets do away with the separation of church and state. Then turn loose the assessors. A tax bill may give them pause. Imagine the property tax bill nationwide the Catholic Church would get. A recovering Catholic can think whimsically. Cant he?
BeyondGeography
(39,762 posts)Kaleva
(37,503 posts)femmedem
(8,353 posts)Separation of church and state is one of those safeguards. I am an atheist and as a child I would have wanted to be protected from pressure to pray in school, regardless of what the majority votes for.
Edited to add: it wasn't in the OP, but his full remarks included, "When we took prayer out of schools, guns came into schools."
https://www.politico.com/newsletters/new-york-playbook-pm/2023/02/28/eric-adams-when-we-took-prayers-out-of-schools-guns-came-into-schools-00084832
True Blue American
(18,096 posts)We are all bad. Absolute separation of Church and State!
Kaleva
(37,503 posts)Lincoln turned out to be an okay president
femmedem
(8,353 posts)If it can become the norm in NYC, it can become the norm anywhere in the U.S.
To be clear, I don't object to politicians citing their faith as motivation for their own actions. I don't object to politicians talking about their own faith. But I do object when they move from citing their own faith to wanting to impose their own faith--or faith in general--on the public as a matter of policy. I see his suggestion that there should be prayer in public schools and his objection to the separation between church and state as threateningly unAmerican.
BOSSHOG
(38,754 posts)Lets do away with it. Theocrats love the separation. They are experts at playing the victim. The want their prayer in public schools. The want to codify their religious beliefs like banning abortion. They want tax money supporting their schools. They adore their tax exempt status. Do away with the separation, turn loose the assessors and we might see what real freedom looks like. Or maybe, probably well see what theocrats prioritize. Im betting on the latter. Im crazy you say. Theocrats violate and ignore the separation at every opportunity. So why have it? Or give them a damn good reason for wanting it upheld, by god.
keithbvadu2
(38,976 posts)What will they say/do when it is not their version of Christianity in charge?
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/americas-true-history-of-religious-tolerance-61312684/?no-ist= ;
Madison also made a point that any believer of any religion should understand: that the government sanction of a religion was, in essence, a threat to religion. "Who does not see," he wrote, "that the same authority which can establish Christianity, in exclusion of all other Religions, may establish with the same ease any particular sect of Christians, in exclusion of all other Sects?" Madison was writing from his memory of Baptist ministers being arrested in his native Virginia.
Kaleva
(37,503 posts)It hasn't happened so I'm not going to spend time worrying about a non-event.
Walleye
(33,770 posts)Which is supreme, US constitution or the Bible? Id like to see them answer it. Its so stupid, theocracies never thrive.
BOSSHOG
(38,754 posts)But they would all lie. Replacing the constitution with their holy book is the end game. If they have to sin to make that happen, then so be it, for them.
Prairie_Seagull
(3,526 posts)I don't know the laws of NYC but this is recall territory in my west coastal state opinion.
MrsCoffee
(5,811 posts)Or god told him he would win or some baloney.
So there's that.
former9thward
(33,023 posts)Prairie_Seagull
(3,526 posts)LakeArenal
(29,526 posts)Walk out with god.
calimary
(83,396 posts)Last I checked, we were NOT a theocracy.
Emile
(27,443 posts)ItsjustMe
(11,456 posts)I am against religion because it teaches us to be satisfied with not understanding the world. Richard Dawkins
I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason and intellect, has intended us to forgo their use. Galileo Galilei
You dont need religion to have morals. If you cant determine right from wrong then you lack empathy, not religion. Kane
I dont want to believe. I want to know. Carl Sagan
That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence. Christopher Hitchens
Belief is the death of intelligence. Robert Anton Wilson
God is an ever-receding pocket of scientific ignorance. Neil deGrasse Tyson
ShazzieB
(17,896 posts)Last edited Thu Mar 2, 2023, 01:08 AM - Edit history (1)
Galileo isn't arguing in favor of atheism, unlike a lot of the others. He's saying that we're not required to choose between believing in the existence of a supreme being and making full use of our "sense, reason, and intellect." That's the page I happen to be on myself.
I don't have a problem with atheism in theory, but whenever someone says (or implies) that atheism is a requirement for making full use of one's intellectual capacities, it gets my back up just a tad bit. I don't agree with that, any more than I agree with those who say I'm going to burn in hell if I don't do religion a certain way.
There's one other quote here that I agree with wholeheartedly:
I could not agree more. Furthermore, to paraphrase Rachel Maddow, looking at what someone does will tell you a lot more about that person than listening to what they say.
summer_in_TX
(3,029 posts)soldierant
(7,627 posts)A whole lot of soi-disant chriatians would do well to listen to Galileo at least.
stopdiggin
(12,358 posts)and still find Adam's statement to be - intentionally inflammatory populism? And offensive in utterly rejecting any church/state barrier. If he (legitimately) doesn't know better .. He should.
qazplm135
(7,450 posts)Is he not a thinking man?
PCIntern
(26,315 posts)He was exhorting the powers that be to help us.
lapfog_1
(29,812 posts)and the "help us" was sarcasm or hyperbole...
PCIntern
(26,315 posts)lark
(23,756 posts)They could have done so much better.
Hotler
(11,784 posts)Farmer-Rick
(10,925 posts)Let's look at all the wonders religion has brought to mankind and supports. Witch burning, the inquisition, genocide (like in the old testament), the KKK (yup they are proud Christians), support of slavery, polygamy, child brides, child abuse, forced birth, hate.....lots and lots of hate. Hate of Jews, of LBGT+ folks, hate of black people, hate of the poor, hate of women, hate of different religions, hate hate hate.
What a dark and putrid heart religion has.
I will never be a child of any imaginary god and I won't apologize.
Yeah, this guy is scum.
SledDriver
(2,074 posts)SalamanderSleeps
(639 posts)Does he not know how arrogant he is when he assumes that he knows all of the corners of the universe and has a special friend that speaks to him to make sure he gets things right?
New York is for everyone that lives there, not just people who lead because their "in good" with an imaginary construct.
wnylib
(23,551 posts)But I have to wonder why he is being so open and
in-your-face about this.
Does he believe that it will play well with enough NYC voters to win another election? Doesn't seem to me that it would work in a large cosmopolitan city.
Dorian Gray
(13,686 posts)for many reasons. BUT...
in this case he was speaking to a roomful of religious folks.
I also don't have a problem with him speaking about his religion. He doesn't make laws in nyc. We have legislators who do that. He's not imposing his religion on anybody.
Now if you're going to criticize him, do so for him being all talk and no action. Dude likes the limelight a lot. Says a lot of things. Doesn't actually get stuff done.
(I am a NYer. I voted for him over the republican candidate. But on the primary, he was NOT in my top five, and I'm feeling pretty vindicated right now.)
wnylib
(23,551 posts)he is free to talk about his own beliefs.
But making statements about not separating religion and government is contrary to the first amendment.
Dorian Gray
(13,686 posts)Eric Adams speaks out of his ass most of the time.
I just roll my eyes and move on.
Freethinker65
(10,701 posts)Adams can believe a unicorn lives in his heart and the moon is made of cheese, it is how he manages the city he was elected to be mayor of that matters.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)Too many people assume any critique of a Democrat is "bashing". There's no rule I'm aware of that legitimate criticism isn't acceptable.
markodochartaigh
(1,669 posts)to be cautious. This is the comment that got me kicked off Daily Kos:
"I think that faith clearly does have something to do with gun violence. It is a positive correlation. And having grown up around evilgelicals I'm not surprised. I remember hearing "Kill them all, let god sort them out." used in the context of many wars and US military interventions. I heard more than one Christian say that they hoped that they would die soon because heaven would be so much better. I remember reading that support for the death penalty even if some innocent people would be killed was around 70%; and then finding out that indeed most of the Christians that I asked were indeed for the death penalty even if innocent people were put to death."
I'm only posting it here so that others can learn from my experience.
Response to brooklynite (Reply #26)
Post removed
GGoss
(1,273 posts)msfiddlestix
(7,582 posts)I can't afford to monetarily support Freedom From Religion foundation , but I support their mission and their work.
Roc2020
(1,662 posts)and even screaming about God. But you know might actually do some good in people's lives....Walk and Live Godly works. Anyone can talk mayor.
sarisataka
(20,159 posts)In response to other speeches were a person spoke about their faith
In closing his victory speech Saturday night, President-elect Joe Biden, the nation's second Catholic president after John F. Kennedy, recalled the Catholic hymn "On Eagle's Wings," a song he said was important to his family and his deceased son Beau, who died of brain cancer in 2015.
"It captures the faith that sustains me, which I believe sustains America. And I hope and I hope I can provide some comfort and solace," he told the crowd before reciting the hymn. "And he will raise you up on eagle's wings, bear you on the breath of dawn. Make you to shine like the sun and hold you in the palm of his hand."
Biden ended with this: "And now, together on eagles wings we embark on the work that God and history have called upon us to do."
In fact I can't recall a single post of criticism...
Gore1FL
(21,588 posts)I think it is disgusting when politicians leverage religion for any purpose during a political speech.
sarisataka
(20,159 posts)When Biden made his speech? Or in response to any of his (many) other references to God and his faith in Presidential speeches?
Gore1FL
(21,588 posts)I don't care if it is genuine belief or if it's playing to the audience. Religion has no place in U.S. politics.
ramen
(838 posts)Biden said his faith informs his work for the country. Adams said that church and state are inseparable, which is not how I like to hear our side speak of religion.
Granted, his audience was faith leadership, but I don't want any politicians of any party to further blur church and state lines in this environment.
treestar
(82,383 posts)it was just for him they were inseparable. He walks with God, and I suppose the voters knew who he was on that score, and they voted him in. Really religious people can't stop talking about God and that would include if they go into politics.
Doesn't mean he has any way to force religion on anyone. He is "witnessing" and maybe wants you to discover Jesus and be saved, but he's in the US, so he can only try - no law can be passed that can force it.
sarisataka
(20,159 posts)Is tying governing and religion fairly closely.
But I don't remember anyone posting how they were disgusted, that Biden should keep the bullshit to himself or having a dark and putrid heart.
ramen
(838 posts)My read on that last sentence you quoted falls under "faith informs my work" and is fundamentally different from what Adams said. I just want a politician's personal religion as far away from our laws and governmental actions as possible. If their beliefs inspire good governance then that's a win-win.
Iris
(15,917 posts)bluesbassman
(19,621 posts)Adams spoke of a direct correlation between removing prayer from schools and school shootings. Forget about how absurdly stupid that theory is and focus on the fact that he was advocating for the abolition of the separation of church and state. Thats why hes being sprayed with venom. Biden said nothing even remotely comparable, and thats why he didnt suffer the same treatment.
sarisataka
(20,159 posts)For changing public school curriculum to include religious education? If so, I will strongly oppose that.
If he is expressing a personal opinion, while referencing his beliefs, but not promoting imposing any beliefs on anyone then they are not dissimilar.
bluesbassman
(19,621 posts)I read the entire speech transcript, and it does contain multiple references to Gods intervention in Adams rise to Mayor. Adams speaks of his faith in terms of his service to the God who selected and facilitated his rise. He shows a complete disregard for the idea of a separation of Church and State. He spoke of his wish that everyone would follow his spiritual viewpoint. That is an Evangelical theocratic viewpoint and simply doesnt belong in a secular government. Adams is dangerous for Democracy.
On the other hand, Biden spoke of his faith, which inspired and sustained HIM. He never said we should all be following the same path. He gets the separation idea and why its there.
Celerity
(46,154 posts)Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)HUAJIAO
(2,512 posts)blechkk
iemanja
(53,932 posts)No, he did not.
SunSeeker
(53,049 posts)intheflow
(28,782 posts)this post is the atheist equivalent to RW ravings against atheists.
Glorfindel
(9,873 posts)"Well I came across a child of God, he was walking along the road
and I asked him tell where are you going, this he told me:
Well, Im going down to Yasgur's farm, going to join in a rock and roll band.
Got to get back to the land, set my soul free.
We are stardust, we are golden, we are billion year old carbon,
and we got to get ourselves back to the garden.
Well, then can I walk beside you? I have come to lose the smog.
And I feel like I'm a cog in something turning.
And maybe it's the time of year, yes, and maybe it's the time of man.
And I don't know who I am but life is for learning.
We are stardust, we are golden, we are billion year old carbon,
and we got to get ourselves back to the garden.
By the time we got to Woodstock, we were half a million strong,
and everywhere there was song and celebration.
And I dreamed I saw the bombers jet planes riding shotgun in the sky,
turning into butterflies above our nation.
We are stardust, we are golden, we caught in the devils bargain,
and we got to get ourselves back to the garden."
-Joni Mitchell
treestar
(82,383 posts)didn't know that lyric about billion year old carbon, though I've heard the song by two different artists at least 500 times. If not more.
MiHale
(10,448 posts)broadcast on all networks telling us that he/she (god) backs theses same policies and why then maybe Ill be ok with it.
But what if god apologizes to us for you being a progeny of him/herself?
twodogsbarking
(11,550 posts)edhopper
(34,389 posts)He is losing popularity among other NY voters and hopes to shore up his vote with the black community. It's cynical as hell.
treestar
(82,383 posts)how very religious a good number of black people can be. It's a refuge from racism too most likely (yeah I know Jesus isn't white or black, but that's not the point, it is the spiritual point and the self boost it can give a lot of people).
edhopper
(34,389 posts)Just how cynical and calculated this tactic by Adams is.
I don't think he believes the bullshit he said.
SpamWyzer
(385 posts)do not take offense at people being "spiritually-minded", I also don't mind faith in all the many forms it exists. I do find it problematic to cite "God" in political speech and to be motivated in your public office by specific religious beliefs. The mayor is not required to leave his faith at the door, but he ought be more considerate of the fact that religion as politics doesn't produce democratic and civic progress when chained to antiquated dogma and subjective interpretations of divine interest in human affairs. Be a "child of God", but keep in mind that you serve a secular constituency.
patphil
(6,705 posts)Even Jesus said to, "Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's and to God the things that are God's"; strong implication that earthly matters and heavenly matters are two separate issues.
Obviously leaders have to have a moral code, and that should guide them as they lead...love, compassion, empathy, inclusion of and respect for everyone, and all that.
But that's where it ends.
Religion is a private matter, and shouldn't be the driving force of government policy.
Once elected officials believe they are doing God's work, they feel they have divine right to do whatever they believe God is telling them to do. This can, and often does, lead to some of the most oppressive and brutal totalitarian governments.
Look at Iran, and, to a lesser extent, Israel. And now look at our own government.
God's will is almost never what the people who claim to follow it are doing. I mean, how would they know? To me, it certainly looks and feels like something else; something self-serving.
bucolic_frolic
(45,664 posts)and he's proselytizing
relayerbob
(6,859 posts)I don't know the guy, and frankly, don't much care about him or NYC politics, but judge him by his actions, not by some statement in a speech.
GusBob
(7,428 posts)because he was a minister or something, folks around here were perfectly fine with it. Like praise Jeebus!
But when Mike Huckabee done it, or this guy, Holy rolling shit on fire folks went cray. Ironic, hey?
Religion and politics brings out hypocrisy in many I reckon
NowISeetheLight
(3,987 posts)I think people like Warnock are talking about how their religion affects their life... they don't want to put laws into effect based on it that we all have to live by. Huckabee on the other hand is like Rick Santorum. He wants a religious theocracy with America as a Christian Nation.
I have no problem with politicians being religious. Heck, I believe in God... I just don't believe what man SAYS about God... and what I believe sure shouldn't be put into law that everyone has to follow. Leave God out of lawmaking.
SunSeeker
(53,049 posts)What people have a problem here with is Adams is basically saying that separation of church and state, the first clause of the First Amendment, is something he can't do:
I cant separate my belief because Im an elected official. When I walk, I walk with God. When I talk, I talk with God. When I put policies in place, I put them in with a God-like approach to them thats who I am, he said.
Warnock thanking God or praising God is very different than Adams saying, "Dont tell me about no separation of church and state." In that quote, Adams sounds more like Herschel Walker than Raphael Warnock. As Garrison Hayes of Mother Jones noted in describing the Warnock v. Walker matchup:
uponit7771
(91,079 posts)Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)People can believe in God, be religious, whatever.
But don't say you don't believe in that separation ... as a Democrat.
Stuart G
(38,726 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)You can't insist people not say certain things. You don't have to agree with him on everything. Especially if he has similar views on the issues. His religion does not matter and he can't force it into his decisions as a mayor. If he blabs about it, that's just something he can do, as you can go on about whatever you believe.
Response to Ferrets are Cool (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
spanone
(137,169 posts)Evolve Dammit
(17,897 posts)CrispyQ
(37,543 posts)we just want you to shut up about it. Keep your fucking religion to yourselves & stop trying to force it on society.
bdamomma
(65,063 posts)when I was growing up you would NOT bring up religion or politics, it was a private thing. Now it's in our faces.
Stuart G
(38,726 posts)Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
fleabiscuit
(4,542 posts)jcboon
(300 posts)There's a big difference between establishing a state religion and a politician expressing their faith.
The government must allow for the free exercise of all religions or lack thereof.
Many great political thinkers were people of faith:
Martin Luther King, Gandhi, Dorothy Day. Malcolm x,
Jimmy Carter, Reinhold Niebuhr, Walter Reuther.
Dietrich Bonhoeffer.
Among the unbelievers we can count Hitler and Joseph Stalin.
I stand with Bonhoeffer any day.
ecstatic
(33,902 posts)My first question would be: Does he say that type of thing when speaking to general audiences?
The comment about separation of church and state was inappropriate, but the other part of what he said, in my opinion, is just common sense.
Even though a lot of elected officials may not admit it, their personal beliefs and their interpretation of how their beliefs should be executed in the real world (compassionately? harshly? not at all?) plays a role in their decision-making. It is part of who they are. Don't go by what they say they believe, go by what they do. That's when you get to see what someone really believes.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)First, I might ask why the NYPL is holding an "interfaith breakfast". Second, its no more acceptable a statement for a public official, even if its what the audience wants to hear.
ecstatic
(33,902 posts)Ideally, politicians should say the exact same thing to every audience.
At first glance, the interfaith breakfast seems like a platform for community leaders to come together to solve problems. Right or wrong, if you preside over a congregation of 500+ people, you're considered a leader. When it comes to people who "lead" hundreds or thousands of people, the only options are CEOs of large corporations, school principals/presidents, elected leaders, religious leaders and celebrities. It wouldn't surprise me if all of those categories of leaders have some sort of event every year.
themaguffin
(4,109 posts)Rebl2
(14,305 posts)separate your religious beliefs from the political office you are running for, please do not seek political office. Some people cannot separate how they think from their religious beliefs because it so much a part of their life and thinking. I suggest those people become ministers or seek some other job and dont run for political office.
maxsolomon
(34,449 posts)His faith can inform his ethics and governance. But there are many faiths. There is not supposed to be an official faith whose beliefs dictate policy.
FoxNewsSucks
(10,729 posts)I'm sick of the attacks on church/state separation, and the forcing of a narrow brand of christofascism on all of us.
hay rick
(8,029 posts)All the Democratic agnostics and atheists I know rush to embrace Judeo-Christian values whether they believe in the existence of God or not. The "no separation of church and state" is an awkward and pandering usage, but there is no mention of sect or scripture.
I do not share the outrage.
PatSeg
(49,526 posts)Not every thought or idea that pops in one's head needs to be publicly expressed. I don't think Eric Adams is really cut out for politics.
Well, at least he is telling the voters who he is and what he really believes.
Tree Lady
(11,955 posts)Jimmy Carter and the world would be a good and fair place.
He never said anything like that, had no need to because he actually lived what he spoke about, wow imagine that if people actually lived the goods things they say they believe in!
malthaussen
(17,502 posts)That first quoted sentence, though, raises warning flags. Body and heart, forsooth? Such analogies are dangerous.
-- Mal
Joinfortmill
(15,712 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(102,057 posts)It is disgusting that a Democrat and his "adviser" are so anti-First Amendment:
...
Ingrid was so right, Adams said, which apparently even shocked the religious leaders assembled for the breakfast at the New York Public Library. Dont tell me about no separation of church and state. State is the body. Church is the heart. You take the heart out of the body, the body dies.
...
He continued on with the idea that God, like an all-powerful Leo McGarry, was responsible for his political rise. He claimed he implements his policies, such as cracking down on the homeless, with a "godlike approach."
I strongly believe in all of my heart, God said, Im going to take the most broken person and Im going to elevate him to the place of being the mayor of the most powerful city on the globe, Adams said, sounding perfectly sane and rational. He could have made me the mayor of Topeka, Kan.
https://www.wonkette.com/eric-adams-proves-that-our-prayers-for-a-normal-nyc-mayor-remain-unanswered
"One of the chosen"? That's Trump-level bullshit. And dissing Topeka, just to prove what an arrogant jerk he is.
bdamomma
(65,063 posts)me to give a donation to
https://ffrf.org/ftod-cr/item/14736-ron-reagan
Silent Type
(5,387 posts)Nictuku
(3,791 posts)I've seen him on Morning Joe a couple of times. And I just didn't like him.
I wouldn't be surprised if he switched parties.
Rhiannon12866
(216,361 posts)Ferrets are Cool
(21,334 posts)Stuart G
(38,726 posts)republianmushroom
(16,321 posts)Aviation91
(114 posts)I don't give a damn what Eric Adams says, the Founding Fathers meant for there to be a separation of church and state!
I don't like him anyway!
SouthernDem4ever
(6,618 posts)The same goes for all the RWNJ Whackadoodles in Congress that use the same tact.
live love laugh
(13,946 posts)Justice matters.
(7,296 posts)DFW
(55,853 posts)Either explain with specific evidence what a « God-like approach » is, and how you KNOW its God-like, or please resign. I have relatives, including a daughter and her family, living in NYC, and I dont want them governed by some wannabe Ayatollah.
stopdiggin
(12,358 posts)no matter what party you spring from. Offensive. Profoundly ignorant. And anti-American.
SunSeeker
(53,049 posts)He should have been a preacher. Then he would not be violating the 1st Amendment.
Warpy
(112,718 posts)"Nuff said.
SleeplessinSoCal
(9,491 posts)Since when? Your bar mitzvah?
GreenWave
(8,405 posts)Merely crawled out of womb and blindly accepted nearest one?
First and last name of deity still a mystery?
intheflow
(28,782 posts)He was addressing clergy, of course he talked about his faith! 🙄 Jimmy Carter has said very similar things, now lets see you post this same thing about him.
muriel_volestrangler
(102,057 posts)He doesn't put down other places (see Adams' remark about Topeka), he doesn't say the separation of church and state should end. And he doesn't bullshit about the end of prayer in schools causing the rise of guns in schools - which is not just offensive, it's mindnumbingly dumb too.
And "he was addressing clergy" is no excuse. If it's bullshit, it's bad, whomever he said it to. Adams should not be sucking up to clergy with anything he wouldn't dare say to the general public.
Why are you asking DUers to attack Carter? Do you love Adams so much?
intheflow
(28,782 posts)Adams was talking to clergy. I believe his comments are taken completely out of context, and the OP couldn't even be bothered to post a link to the source. I invited an attack on Carter to underscore the hypocrisy and broad-brush assumptions against Christians. There are many Christians who live their faith out loud and with integrity, and they are also Democrats. See: Carter, MLK, Biden, Warnock. Your comments implying I'm some kind of troll are way out of line.
muriel_volestrangler
(102,057 posts)Here's a link, already in this thread: https://www.wonkette.com/eric-adams-proves-that-our-prayers-for-a-normal-nyc-mayor-remain-unanswered
"What the actual fuck" is a good reaction to what Adams, and his adviser Ingrid Lewis-Martin, said.
This is not about Adams "living his faith out loud and with integrity", it's about him attacking the First Amendment, unlike all the people you list. It's also about him being arrogant, and just not the kind of Christian that they are.
"Context" does not excuse this.
intheflow
(28,782 posts)He said he was faithful and that theres no separation of church and state to him, as he practices his faith. He never suggested he would abuse/not serve New Yorkers who arent Christian. He was speaking the language of faith to clergy. They all understood the difference between personal belief and his remarks were not a referendum on making NYC a theocratic city.
As he recounted in Living Faith, he broke them into three key questions for Gods guidance, essentially: (1) Are the goals I am pursuing appropriate? (2) Am I doing the right thing based on my personal moral code, my Christian faith, and the duties of my current position? (3) Have I done my best, based on the alternatives open to me?
^^ Notice the I statements. IOW, youre mad at Adams for saying out loud what Carter practiced in silence. I stand by my opinion that hating on Adams for statements taken out of context is the atheist version of the far right railing against atheists.
BTW, I am an atheist but I prefer not lumping all the Christians together. But thanks for the link.
muriel_volestrangler
(102,057 posts)He is not "the state", so "State is the body. Church is the heart" is not about him. "When we took prayers out of schools, guns came into schools" is not an "I" statement. It's just stupid. And right-wing.
There's no "context" here that mitigates his crappiness. Other Democratic politicians manage to talk about their faith without this BS. He's saying what so many Republicans say.
Warpy
(112,718 posts)which is one reason he lost in 1980. I know a lot of women who voted for Anderson, instead.
Years of building housing for those poor people changed him profoundly and eventually he broke with the Southern Baptists over their rabid sexism. He'd seen the damage it did to abandoned women and children.
His presidency was remarkable for two things: the US was not involved in any military actions during it and he made the tough decisions about the runaway OPEC inflation that eventually stabilized the economy. However, he was arrogant and blinded by religion during his presidency.
I lived through those years. I can't conflate the remarkable man he became with the man he once was. I saw both.
SunSeeker
(53,049 posts)What people have a problem with here is Adams is basically saying that separation of church and state, the first clause of the First Amendment, is something he doesn't care about and can't do:
I cant separate my belief because Im an elected official. When I walk, I walk with God. When I talk, I talk with God. When I put policies in place, I put them in with a God-like approach to them thats who I am, he said.
Carter has never said that. Nor has Warnock. Warnock thanking God or praising God is very different than Adams saying, "Dont tell me about no separation of church and state." In that quote, Adams sounds more like Herschel Walker than Raphael Warnock. As Garrison Hayes of Mother Jones noted in describing the Warnock v. Walker matchup:
no_hypocrisy
(47,976 posts)and ascribing those attributes to a belief in God (any God). That sets up a false dichotomy of "Us and Them" with the latter being immoral, criminal, disreputable, dangerous, and worthy of being persecuted.
Happy Hoosier
(8,063 posts)If he can;t separate his duties as a Constitutional elected official from his religious beliefs, then he is, IMHO, unqualified for the job.