Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(49,129 posts)
Tue Jan 10, 2023, 09:18 PM Jan 2023

Tom Nichols:There was a time when congressional candidates had to tell at least some of the truth

Tweet, then link to The Atlantic and an excerpt:





https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2023/01/george-santos-congress-lies/672692/

-snip-

There was a time when congressional candidates generally had to tell at least some of the truth if they were caught lying. Santos is amazing: His double-downs and elisions tumble out effortlessly but pointlessly, even if he does manage to muster a certain amount of boyish charm while stepping on rake after rake. When did his mother die? Well, that depends on what when or die means. Did he work in high finance? Well, not really, but again, it might depend on what high means. Did he go to college? Well, he’s been near a college or two. Close enough. Is he gay or straight, Jewish or Catholic? Did his family die in the Holocaust in Europe? Are they from Brazil, or anywhere in this solar system on our side of the asteroid belt?

You can trip over some fibs in public life, and you can weather a few indiscretions. Normally, however, you cannot survive telling a tale that has more fakery in it than the entire cover story of Philip and Elizabeth Jennings, the two fictional Soviet spies in the TV series The Americans. (At least Philip and Elizabeth have real jobs.) I am not saying that George Santos is a spy or a plant. Deep-cover agents are far more competent than Santos is at … well, everything, but especially at lying.

Even one of Santos’s campaign fundraisers tried the Man of Mystery approach, reportedly presenting himself to GOP donors as Kevin McCarthy’s chief of staff. This might even be a crime, which is probably why Santos, his lawyers, and everyone else have dummied up and refused to answer any more questions about it. But it is revealing that some guy allegedly impersonated the Republican leader’s chief of staff to raise money and gave it to a serial liar who then got elected to Congress—and that this escapade hasn’t been even more of a story.

Like Walker, Santos himself isn’t really the issue. The problem is a Republican Party that has come to expect its voters to put up with anything rather than lose one vote in Congress. And with rare exceptions, this gamble—that the party faithful are either too polarized, too numb, or too inattentive to care—has paid off. This is why Kevin McCarthy had to fight for his political life against the likes of Matt Gaetz and Lauren Boebert and Andy Biggs. Worse yet, it’s why he had to count on Taylor Greene and Donald Trump himself as his allies.

-snip-
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Tom Nichols:There was a time when congressional candidates had to tell at least some of the truth (Original Post) highplainsdem Jan 2023 OP
Lying is only illegal under oath? Proof here. Dum Aloo Jan 2023 #1
Congressman can say anything on the floor of Congress and be protected from civil action Walleye Jan 2023 #2
that time is looong gooone republianmushroom Jan 2023 #3
I'd rephrase that to read, "There was a time when a congressional candidate would be publicly Martin68 Jan 2023 #4

Dum Aloo

(222 posts)
1. Lying is only illegal under oath? Proof here.
Tue Jan 10, 2023, 09:25 PM
Jan 2023

But, even still… what is the truth?

Soon, all can be faked or created.

Walleye

(31,159 posts)
2. Congressman can say anything on the floor of Congress and be protected from civil action
Tue Jan 10, 2023, 11:23 PM
Jan 2023

I guess that extends to all the lying and slandering they do outside Congress

Martin68

(22,971 posts)
4. I'd rephrase that to read, "There was a time when a congressional candidate would be publicly
Wed Jan 11, 2023, 01:50 PM
Jan 2023

humiliated if caught in an outright lie, and would be forced by their own party to resign."

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Tom Nichols:There was a t...