General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMANY SAD RETURNS TODAY FOR THE NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION
SPENT more than $11.7 million against President Barack Obama - NRA defeated
SPENT more than $1 million against Sen. Sherrod Brown, OHIO - NRA defeated
SPENT more than $626,000 against Sen. Bill Nelson, FLORIDA - NRA defeated
SPENT more than $610,000 against Tim Kaine, Virginia (U.S. Senate) - NRA defeated
SPENT more than $341,000 against Sen. Claire McCaskill, MISSOURI - NRA defeated
SPENT more than $320,000 against Tammy Baldwin, WISCONSIN (U.S. Senate) - NRA defeated
SPENT more than $48,000 against Chris Murphy, Connecticut (U.S. Senate) - NRA defeated
What additional evidence is needed for elected officials and the media to finally discard the myth of the NRA's power to influence elections?
--Brady Campaign/Facebook feed
Skittles
(153,226 posts)drm604
(16,230 posts)Sure, there are a few here and there who's circumstances warrant it but other than them, why does anyone feel the need to carry a concealed weapon other than out of fear?
eqfan592
(5,963 posts)It has no sound logical basis, no sound statistical basis, and it just muddies the waters of the debate.
Bandit
(21,475 posts)They have to be afraid of something or why bother? FEAR is the ONLY explanation.
Atypical Liberal
(5,412 posts)But not like you think.
Look, "fear" of car accidents is why I wear a seat belt every day. Fear of fire is why I have smoke detectors in my home. Fear of carbon monoxide poisoning is why I have CO detectors in my home.
This doesn't mean that I am some kind of paranoid person living in desperate fear of car accidents, fires, or suffocation. It's just that the tools for handling these situations are cheap and easy to obtain, and they don't hurt anyone, so it's easy to be prepared.
Carrying a firearm is the same way. Odds are, you'll never need one. Violent crime has been on the decline for decades now. But firearms are cheap and easy to obtain, and people with permits to carry them are hardly ever involved in crime - less so than people without them - so it's no big deal.
eqfan592
(5,963 posts)Thanks, Atypical.
eqfan592
(5,963 posts)Somebody taking a precaution against an eventuality, even an unlikely one, does not mean that person is living in fear OF that eventuality.
drm604
(16,230 posts)That's the nature of debate. You don't get to stifle opposition just so that you can have a nice clean non-muddy non-debate.
And you don't get to just end debate by calling something an "idiotic meme" and demanding that it be dropped. If that's how it works then I could just throw the same demand back at you and your viewpoint.
In fact, that's what I'll do (since you can do it): Your whole argument is an idiotic meme and muddies the water and you should just drop it.
I did not come in here intending to get into a gun debate so I am out of here.
eqfan592
(5,963 posts)Simply because you have a viewpoint doesn't mean it is one grounded in reality and thus deserving of respect. Such idiocy only serves to stifle real debate, not facilitate it.
But since you weren't even interested in a debate on this issue anyway, then I question why you decided to make such an inflamatory remark in the first place. Sorry, but your faux rage post is laughable.
glacierbay
(2,477 posts)you do know that the police aren't responsible for the individual citizens safety unless in our custody? We're only responsible for the general publics safety, you are responsible for your own safety, that's why citizens obtain CC permits, not out of fear, but to be able to protect themselves if it ever came to that.
rDigital
(2,239 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)There are millions of fellow Americans who would take issue with that smear.
still_one
(92,454 posts)Kaleva
(36,361 posts)The NRA-ILA relies on donations from members and non-members to fund its political activities. The NRA charter prohibits dues paid by members to be used for such.
madrchsod
(58,162 posts)a hunters magazine instead of a gun owners political magazine
drm604
(16,230 posts)I wonder how much the Kochs spent against Obama. Whatever the amount, they threw it away.
FailureToCommunicate
(14,026 posts)marmar
(77,097 posts)nt
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)eqfan592
(5,963 posts)Lets stop getting hung up on an implement and start targeting the root causes of crime (poverty, education, etc.). The political capital we waste on failed gun control measures is costing us dearly in our ability to tackle the these other, significantly more important issues.
Occulus
(20,599 posts)Did yours contain any measures associated with gun control legislation?
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)without ballot measures, and still spread the stink around.
This is a solid fact: The gun-control outlook MADE the modern "post-Fudd" NRA.
I look forward to the GOP-led, GOP-founded Brady Center fading into even greater irrelevency.
Paladin
(28,277 posts)It doesn't sell around here---particularly on a day like today.......
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Do try to keep your Republican allies in the right column.
Again, hard fact: Gun-controllers made the modern NRA.
HA! Republicans begetting Republicans; such spurrious issue.
FailureToCommunicate
(14,026 posts)and their poorly served members.
eqfan592
(5,963 posts)Because say what you like about the NRA, the Brady Campaign is at least as disingenuous as the NRA, but with less popular support.
rDigital
(2,239 posts)derby378
(30,252 posts)Let's remember that Sen. Gillibrand in NY flip-flopped on guns after being threatened with a primary challenge by Carolyn McCarthy and leaned on heavily by Chuck Schumer and his Brady Campaign advisors. Now maybe I'm not running for a seat in the US House or Senate, but even if I was, I think you'd find me a much tougher nut to crack.
rDigital
(2,239 posts)Occulus
(20,599 posts)Mine listed no measures even tangentially associated with the Brady campaign.
Angleae
(4,497 posts)I thought they were broke.
leftyohiolib
(5,917 posts)Renew Deal
(81,883 posts)Obama has been a pro-gun president. That money is purely partisan.
derby378
(30,252 posts)He has vocalized support for a ban on "assault weapons," whatever they might be, but some of his policies regarding National Parks and Amtrak have been surprisingly reasonable and conciliatory towards Second Amendment activists.
eqfan592
(5,963 posts)Strongly doubt in fact. It has been, and continues to be a poison pill issue. I'd be curious to see the stats in NC on how many single issue voters voted against him because of his mentioning of an "assault weapons" ban.
derby378
(30,252 posts)I think we can expect "no" votes from (among others) Jon Tester, Ben Casey, and Joe Donnelly - and let's not forget Majority Leader Harry Reid.
ManiacJoe
(10,136 posts)Dues do not go to the NRA-ILA.
leftyohiolib
(5,917 posts)Kingofalldems
(38,496 posts)should not be allowed on DU.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Kingofalldems
(38,496 posts)Did Brady campaign against Democrats?
eqfan592
(5,963 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)he was undecided as to who to vote for in presidential race. You may recall, McCain supported an AWB.
Of course, few Demos want a Brady enbdorsement. Wonder why.
There is NOTHING liberal about gun control.
sancheztax
(8 posts)Can you do this same analysis for the US Chamber of Commerce?
bhikkhu
(10,725 posts)If they just did what they were supposedly there for, and thought a bit that the idea that "we are all inherently equal in rights and dignity" is actually good for business, then they might see a useful way forward.
bhikkhu
(10,725 posts)which have been doing just fine under Obama and democratic legislatures. They've got to stop being an old-white-guy club.
Renew Deal
(81,883 posts)That's the kicker
eqfan592
(5,963 posts)Because it is a poison pill issue that serves no useful purpose. It's wasted political capital better spent on fighting poverty and improving our education system, things that may have a chance at reducing our violent crime rate even further, unlike more gun control laws.
Junkdrawer
(27,993 posts)"He's going to grab our guns for SURE this time."
Wayne and his REAL backers are crying all the way to the bank.
hack89
(39,171 posts)nolabels
(13,133 posts)A kiss of %#$@ is what the real deal is.
It is kind of like if some gun nuts were to send your candidacy some money run to Fed-ex immediately to rush it right back
hack89
(39,171 posts)Harry Reid immediately comes to mine. The NRA endorsed 56 Dems in congressional races in 2010 - with many more in local races.
Their policy is to endorse a pro-2A incumbent regardless of party.
nolabels
(13,133 posts)I would say the NRA would be much better served in furthering their cause if they got out of politics and instead spent the money on training of would be gun owners on security, handling and safe recreational use of their firearms. I don't see anything wrong of ownership but giving someone the idea that possession of such give a leg up on others is a bad idea especially with the idea it gives an excuse or a way out of something. Violence, intimidation and the magic bullet never solves anything and often makes matters worse.
Imagine what it would be like if people didn't see firearms as a weapon against other people and was just a sport like baseball or basketball. If the NRA spent their extra millions in some kind of target contests with worthwhile or even big prizes for the contestants. If you think about it, a hammer is as only as smart as the person holding it.
hack89
(39,171 posts)it is the gold standard. Their Eddie Eagle GunSafe Program is the best program in the country for teaching gun safety to young kids.
Lets remember what got the NRA into politics in the first place - the 1992 Assault Weapon Ban. Want the NRA out of politics then take gun control out of politics.
nolabels
(13,133 posts)or six years in the reserves.
And for correction
"Originally, the NRA was not as involved in the political process as it is today. In 1980, they endorsed a US presidential candidate (Ronald Reagan) for the first time in their history."
History of the National Rifle Association and Guns | Guns Guns Guns:
http://www.gunsgunsguns.com/resources/history-of-the-national-rifle-association-and-guns.html
Yea, and that is why i can tune in sports center and see a major golf update and nothing about a sharpshooting championship. Most anything has a hard time going main stream as long as it people with crazy ideas behind it
hack89
(39,171 posts)the military is so small relative to the population as well as being very selective that your measure would be a defacto ban on exercising a civil liberty.
nolabels
(13,133 posts)Going out in the cold and the snow or the heat and rain for field exercises. Getting up at 3:35 am so you shine your boots before the morning inspection. It's just freaking insane that some people think owning a firearm something to toy with. The idea of individuals having firearms in their personal control was was put on us when we had no real military. But now we have a military much larger than most anyone else, so what is so important, owning the firearm or a large military. It's like a lot redundant.
Civil liberty is a crock of shit unless you have a good reason to need and use it. I could figure out many things that others might think are a infringement on such supposed freedom type ideas. But being a pawn to any kind of lobby for others unearned enrichment is not my cup of tea. The place i live in is a give and take, and more militarism to bolster someone else's idea of what patriotism should look like a dead end to me.
Besides i spent my time in the service and already have had my fun
hack89
(39,171 posts)Paladin
(28,277 posts)...even though Romney endorsed an assault weapons ban. The fact that Romney was a Republican was all the NRA required. And let's see Wayne LaPierre and Ted Nugent "take gun control out of politics," then maybe we'll talk.
And Eddie Eagle better stay the fuck out of my school district. If I find out the NRA is infiltrating the local schools, I'm not going to be happy.
hack89
(39,171 posts)if you are a pro-2A incumbent they will endorse you. They routinely endorse democrats at the state level.
So you would jeopardize the safety of children on the altar of your anti-gun beliefs? What if there is no organization available with the proper political beliefs?