General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCan you imagine the conversations between the prosecutors in Garlands investigation, the prosecutors
in the Georgia investigation and the people on the J6 committee. They must all be coordinating their investigations, sharing information, talking strategy. For the most part they are investigating the same crimes. They have to make sure they don't get in each others way. They all need each others evidence.
If the first indictments come from Georgia, which would make sense, they are State charges. That would open the door for Garland to follow with Federal charges for the same crimes.
I am happy the committee is now sending all their evidence to the DOJ. That will speed things up. The DOJ can now combine that evidence with the evidence they have. We don't know what evidence the DOJ has. The DOJ has better tools to get evidence than the committee did. I imagine they have some damning evidence.
I have no doubt all the traitors are shitting their pants. They saw the referrals the committee put forward. They know they are facing multiple investigations at the State and Federal level. I tell ya, when the shit hits the fan, it's really going to hit the fan.
gab13by13
(21,513 posts)DOJ has way more manpower, way more assets, way more clout than state prosecutors and certainly way more than the J6 committee.
IMO, the J6 committee's investigation put DOJ to shame. When DOJ heard Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony it was a kick in their ass to get moving. The J6 committee pushed DOJ.
As far as Fani Willis, I wish that DOJ had run a parallel investigation, that would have helped with coordination.
Hotler
(11,485 posts)to us. This call my be recorded for training purposes. .....
Autumn
(45,120 posts)They still havent deposed many people, none of the fake electors, and reportedly couldn't find people they wanted to subpoena. Which is odd as fuck since I would bet anything the DOJ could have had access to anything the committee had in real time, if they had wanted it. That's straight from a J6 committee chairman. Wishful thinking should never be posted as a fact.
fightforfreedom
(4,913 posts)We get sound bites and peoples opinions about the DOJ. The DOJ couldn't find people to issue a subpoena? Do you believe that shit?
The committee refused to hand over their evidence to The DOJ until they finished, which makes sense.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)They still havent deposed many people, none of the fake electors, and reportedly couldn't find people they wanted to subpoena. That's from a Jan 6 committee chairman.