Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cyrano

(15,129 posts)
Sat Dec 10, 2022, 09:46 AM Dec 2022

The REAL Big Lie is: "No one is above the law."

If anyone in America committed even a single one of the countless crimes that the Orange Beast has, they'd be in prison at this very moment. Yet, The Emperor of Mar-a-Lago is free and may never be held answerable for anything.

Even when various federal prosecutors, and those in NY and Georgia, seem to be on the verge of indicting him, someone in the judicial system gets in the way.

I'm convinced he could eat a newborn baby in Times Square, televised live, and nothing would happen to him.

I really, Really, never again want to hear some idiot say, "No one is above the law."

56 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The REAL Big Lie is: "No one is above the law." (Original Post) Cyrano Dec 2022 OP
Actually It's Worse Than That The Roux Comes First Dec 2022 #1
Those and I would add nightwing1240 Dec 2022 #2
All the way to Berlin. Kid Berwyn Dec 2022 #5
Wow and yes, agreed nightwing1240 Dec 2022 #6
The American who let the Nazis rebuild Germany Kid Berwyn Dec 2022 #40
I recommend The Brothers about the Dulles brothers if you haven't already read it. Lonestarblue Dec 2022 #8
Kinzer's is an outstanding work. Kid Berwyn Dec 2022 #41
Thank you for the recommendation and the review. I'll definitely add The Devil's Chessboard Lonestarblue Dec 2022 #50
+1000 n/t MarcA Dec 2022 #24
New light on the subject... Kid Berwyn Dec 2022 #43
I Was Seriously Negligent in Leaving Out Henry Ford The Roux Comes First Dec 2022 #56
If You're Rich or Connected modrepub Dec 2022 #3
"No one is above the law?" Gary 50 Dec 2022 #4
No American is above the law Farmer-Rick Dec 2022 #12
Really makes one wonder if Darwin was right about evolution. Cyrano Dec 2022 #15
What if we did something other than capitalism? I_UndergroundPanther Dec 2022 #54
Many countries evolved away from feudalism and slavery Farmer-Rick Dec 2022 #55
You're Reading The Wrong Threads SoCalDavidS Dec 2022 #7
That is what I thought too skydive forever Dec 2022 #11
In our country you are innocent until proven kairos12 Dec 2022 #9
+1 Emile Dec 2022 #10
Made me LOL. mnhtnbb Dec 2022 #16
It was hard to do, but I've come to terms with the fact that Trump will never be held accountable. CrispyQ Dec 2022 #13
We used to give to red states like fl, Ohio, and tx, in hopes that they would see the light childfreebychoice Dec 2022 #18
I still have some hope that Smith will indict him, but my confidence is low. Lonestarblue Dec 2022 #32
We've heard he's in big trouble now and is about to be indicted. Kablooie Dec 2022 #14
Never thought Mueller would save us, and agree, t* will die at home, childfreebychoice Dec 2022 #19
There has always been a double standard of justice dlk Dec 2022 #17
It really sucks to have a sense of justice while, in reality, it rarely comes about Cyrano Dec 2022 #20
Agreed. n/t MarcA Dec 2022 #29
I've been scolded many times for observing that fact Orrex Dec 2022 #21
What. Think you're some kind of kid? ancianita Dec 2022 #27
I have had posts hidden for referring to "cheerleaders" Orrex Dec 2022 #28
This message was self-deleted by its author ancianita Dec 2022 #33
WTF does that even mean? Orrex Dec 2022 #37
Ah, I see. Now I see what you meant by scold. ancianita Dec 2022 #39
Don't FUD me, bro'. ancianita Dec 2022 #22
Of those groups charged with fines... Orrex Dec 2022 #23
Check the page links. It explains everything. Take the first one, for example... ancianita Dec 2022 #26
The OP engages in hyperbole, but the underlying point is the same Orrex Dec 2022 #30
No, it doesn't. It makes a claim. Only children engage in hyperbole about adult matters like LAW. ancianita Dec 2022 #31
I don't refuse to discuss it. Orrex Dec 2022 #36
You really should read post #5 and the links it provides. Cyrano Dec 2022 #42
I will, thanks. ancianita Dec 2022 #44
I admire your idealism, ancianita. Cyrano Dec 2022 #45
Then you don't understand a thing I've said. ancianita Dec 2022 #46
Oh. Okay. Cyrano Dec 2022 #47
I hear you, too. ancianita Dec 2022 #49
As long as trump's alive, there will be somebody above the law in this country. (nt) Paladin Dec 2022 #25
He will pay fines, lose lawsuits, maybe go bankrupt. MarcA Dec 2022 #34
Listen to Rachel Maddow's Podcast 'ULTRA'. Politics IS above the Law. Always has been. Nothing new. Tommymac Dec 2022 #35
Re ULTRA's lesson and "how We The People can mitigate shit like this in the end. Activism." ancianita Dec 2022 #38
The acceptance implicit in this title is a huge part of the reason Hortensis Dec 2022 #48
"they'd be in prison at this very moment." brooklynite Dec 2022 #51
If you believe "No one is above the law" you haven't paid attention. GoldandSilver Dec 2022 #52
The Banksters Run Free Kid Berwyn Dec 2022 #53

The Roux Comes First

(1,337 posts)
1. Actually It's Worse Than That
Sat Dec 10, 2022, 10:33 AM
Dec 2022

I don't like nurturing cynicism, but if we must, let's just contemplate George Bush, Dick Cheney, Ken Starr, and Bill Barr for starters.

nightwing1240

(1,996 posts)
2. Those and I would add
Sat Dec 10, 2022, 10:43 AM
Dec 2022

George Bush Sr, Casper Weinberger, Oliver North, Ronald Reagan, Spiro Agnew and Richard Nixon. Does anyone else detect a pattern here?

Kid Berwyn

(15,691 posts)
5. All the way to Berlin.
Sat Dec 10, 2022, 10:49 AM
Dec 2022


Curiously missing from American history and any mention of the Warren Commission in corporate media:

Two of its members were directly responsible for the rise of post-war fascism. Allen Dulles, as a top official of the OSS and CIA, incorporated NAZI war criminals into the CIA from its founding. John McCloy, as High Commissioner for Germany, allowed Klaus Barbie, Alfred Krupp, eight members of his board, and who-knows-who-else to escape justice. Of course, Dulles and McCloy also were barons of Wall Street and Beltway Insiders, at the heart of the military industrial complex. We all can see what that means for the United States today.

Background:

The American who let the Nazis rebuild Germany

https://thecritic.co.uk/issues/november-2021/the-american-who-let-the-nazis-rebuild-germany/

CIA and NAZI War Criminals

https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB146/index.htm

Kid Berwyn

(15,691 posts)
40. The American who let the Nazis rebuild Germany
Sat Dec 10, 2022, 02:02 PM
Dec 2022
John McCloy freed Hitler’s favourite industrialists. Their firms still dominate the country’s economy

By Adam LeBor
The arctic (UK), November 2021

Tucked away on the website of the United States embassy to Germany is a lengthy hagiography of a man who nowadays is largely forgotten, but should not be. “John J. McCloy and the ‘Splendid Reconciliation’” by the late Garrick Utley recounts McCloy’s life and some of his achievements. McCloy, an American lawyer, served as the highest-ranking U.S. official in West Germany from to 1949 to 1952 — king in all but name. As McCloy noted, “I had the powers of a dictator as High Commissioner of Allied Forces in West Germany, but I think I was a benevolent dictator. I think the rebuilding came off very well, with no significant problems. It wasn’t a matter of ordering things done so much as using orderly persuasion with the Germans.”

That the United States freed vast numbers of high-ranking Nazi officials, scientists and SS officers and then employed them has been well documented by historians such as Tom Bower and Christopher Simpson. The dilemma, known as “hang or hire”, was often resolved by the latter.

Werner von Braun, the Nazi rocket scientist who sent V-2 missiles crashing into London was relocated to the United States, together with a legion of German scientists and engineers. Reinhard Gehlen served as chief of military intelligence on the eastern front where German troops had carried out unimaginable atrocities. He was appointed the head of West Germany’s new intelligence service.

Post-war Pax Americana demanded the rehabilitation of German industrial giants
Much less well-known is the parallel operation by McCloy and his key allies in United States government, such as intelligence chief Allen Dulles, to free numerous Nazi industrialists and bankers and return them to positions of great economic power and influence — in particular the men who ran I.G. Farben, the most powerful industrial conglomerate in Nazi Germany, a subsidiary of which manufactured Zyklon B, the poison gas used to murder millions.

That decision by McCloy and his powerful allies in the American political establishment — that the economy of the new West German state should be run in large part by numerous convicted war criminals — shaped West Germany, post-war Europe and our world today.

Helmut Schmidt, the former Chancellor of West Germany, described McCloy as “the architect of Germany’s rehabilitation from an occupied country to an independent state”. Henry Kissinger said of McCloy that he “never served in the Cabinet of any president, and after 1952, never occupied a full-time position. Yet few Americans have had a greater impact on their time.”

Continues…

https://thecritic.co.uk/issues/november-2021/the-american-who-let-the-nazis-rebuild-germany/

All the Money, Power, Property & Prestige in the World with Zero Accountability.

Lonestarblue

(10,579 posts)
8. I recommend The Brothers about the Dulles brothers if you haven't already read it.
Sat Dec 10, 2022, 11:11 AM
Dec 2022

It’s by Stephen Kinzer and shows quite clearly how Allen Dulles especially used the government to advantage corporate power and profits. He engineered the overturning of the democratically elected government in Iran at the urging of British and American oil interests. Corporations have been running our government for their benefit for decades. And they do not support democracy unless it brings money to them.

Kid Berwyn

(15,691 posts)
41. Kinzer's is an outstanding work.
Sat Dec 10, 2022, 02:26 PM
Dec 2022

Like the NAZIs, what Capitalism's Invisible Army wants, they get. Take Guatemala, which they did in 1953.



“Allen was delighted with the way Glorious Victory portrayed him and proudly handed out small-format copies." -- Stephen Kinzer, "The Brothers: John Foster Dulles, Allen Dulles, and Their Secret World War"

https://books.google.com/books?id=LVb4-1l1gF4C&pg=PT393&lpg=PT393&dq=kinzer+the+brothers+dulles+diego+rivera&source=bl&ots=oAzpiYDehY&sig=f_qxzSRtbNna7xjgv6CoOpAMfMs&hl=en&sa=X&ei=duIJVbzFG_WCsQSY3IKABA&ved=0CEYQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=kinzer%20the%20brothers%20dulles%20diego%20rivera&f=false

You might also enjoy reading “The Devil’s Chessboard” by David Talbot. The author makes clear the history, pointing a pen at the likely architect of the coup of November 22, 1963.

Checkmate on ‘The Devil’s Chessboard’

Exclusive: Since the end of World War II, what some call the “deep state” has taken hold of the American Republic, stripping the citizens of meaningful control over national security issues, with CIA Director Allen Dulles playing a key early role, according to David Talbot’s new biography reviewed by Lisa Pease.


By Lisa Pease
ConsortiumNews.com, Oct. 27, 2015

David Talbot’s new book The Devil’s Chessboard is an anecdotal biography of not just Allen Dulles but of the national security establishment that he helped create. Talbot gave himself the monumental task of summing up a 25-year slice of important history.

Because Talbot has a keen eye for both the absurd and the darkly humorous, he managed to make the disturbing history of that period not only eminently readable but engaging and at times downright entertaining.

I have consumed dozens of books on Allen Dulles, the CIA and Cold War history, yet I was still surprised by numerous revelations in Talbot’s book. He often covers well-known episodes through a less well-known set of incidents and characters.

Talbot writes about the ratlines (escape routes from Europe to Latin America for Nazis), but in the context of one particularly Machiavellian character. He writes about Lee Harvey Oswald from the point of view of one of his friends who sold him down the river to the Warren Commission, likely at the behest of the CIA, a friend who later ostensibly committed suicide just as a member of the House Select Committee on Assassinations was about to interview him. Talbot talks about the CIA’s mind-control programs in the context of Allen Dulles submitting his own son to those horrors.

Talbot and his research associate Karen Croft, to whom he dedicated his book, have found all sorts of nuggets in Allen Dulles’s papers, his appointment calendar, oral histories, and other less-used sources. In addition, Talbot infuses his book with anecdotes from interviews he personally conducted. While I found some points I could nitpick in various episodes, overall this is a worthy addition and a much-needed perspective that elucidates how we came to have two governments: the elected one and the one that doesn’t answer to the elected one.

Talbot’s presentation is not linear but episodic, jumping back and forth like a checker on the chessboard in his title to keep subjects thematically together. Doing this allows him to introduce the character of Allen Dulles quickly, by showing him handing over a World War I girlfriend, “a young Czech patriot,” to British agents who suspected her of being an enemy spy, after which, Talbot tells us, she “disappeared forever.”

Talbot demonstrates that Dulles always found a way to do what he wanted, regardless of what he had been asked to do, even from his entry into the World War II’s Office of Strategic Services, the CIA’s forerunner. OSS chief William “Wild Bill” Donovan had tried to assign Dulles to London to exploit Dulles’s cozy relationships with high-net-worth individuals like the Rockefellers whom Dulles served as a lawyer at Sullivan and Cromwell. But Dulles instead got himself assigned to Bern, Switzerland, at the near center of Europe and a financial Mecca for secret bank accounts.

Allen Dulles’s older brother John Foster Dulles had funneled “massive U.S. investments” into Germany post-World War I that flowed back to the U.S. as war loans were paid off. Both Dulles brothers enabled the Nazis financially and socially, with John Foster Dulles at one point defending the character of a Nazi lobbyist who threw a party in New York City to celebrate a Nazi victory in France.

Sparing the Nazis

Talbot makes the case that Allen Dulles was all but a “Double Agent” for the Nazis during World War II. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt knew how close Dulles was to the Germans but thought Dulles, as an American, would do the President’s bidding, serving as a lure for high-profile Nazis so they could be identified and neutralized.

In pursuing victory, FDR pushed for an unconditional surrender, but Dulles had other plans. He told an agent of SS leader Heinrich Himmler that the Allies’ declaration of the need for unconditional surrender was “merely a piece of paper to be scrapped without further ado if Germany would sue for peace.”

Roosevelt had assigned Dulles to support Project Safehaven, a program to identify and confiscate Nazi assets stashed in neutral countries. But instead Dulles, aided by his friend Tom McKittrick, the head of the Bank for International Settlements, sought to protect his German client’s accounts.

Insubordination to presidents was a running theme in Dulles’s life. But the younger Dulles brother did not yet have the power he would command later in life, so FDR’s policies won out over Dulles’s covert challenges.

Money and the power that money enabled, not ideology, was the predominant motivator for Dulles and his ilk. As Talbot noted, “It is not widely recognized that the Nazi reign of terror was, in a fundamental way, a lucrative racket — an extensive criminal enterprise set up to loot the wealth of Jewish victims and exploit their labor.”

Dulles did not appear to have a problem with the decimation of the Jews. Instead, Dulles believed the real enemy were the Communists, who had the potential to shift the balance of financial power. So Dulles found natural camaraderie with the Nazi elite, who also viewed the Soviets as their biggest threat. Dulles ignored or downplayed the reports he was receiving from escapees and journalists regarding the burning of human beings in concentration camps.

Dulles’s declassified communications showed little regard for the killing of the Jews and much more interest in psychological warfare tricks, “such as distributing counterfeit stamps behind enemy lines depicting Hitler’s profile as a death’s skull, and other cloak-and-dagger antics,” Talbot tells us.

When one reporter took a detailed report of what was happening to Dulles, the journalist said Dulles was “profoundly shocked” and thought action should be taken immediately. Yet Dulles had been receiving similar reports for more than two years and had done nothing about it, and he did next to nothing with this report as well.

Dulles wasn’t the only one keeping the atrocities from being reported, of course. First, the Nazis operated in as much secrecy as possible, so credible reports were hard to come by. But even when they came, many others in government, such as Secretary of State Cordell Hull, turned a blind eye. Hull was one of those who advised President Roosevelt not to allow the St. Louis, a ship of German Jewish refugees, to dock at an American port and who had blocked an important, detailed, first-hand account of what was going on in the camps from reaching the President.

In Italy, Dulles pursued his own secret peace agreement, which he dubbed Operation Sunrise, which flew in the face of FDR’s stated policies. And while Dulles presented himself to people as a personal representative of FDR, the absurdity of that was not lost on some of Dulles’s targets.

Launching the Cold War

During the Nuremberg trials, again, Dulles took the side opposite of what FDR had wanted, the meting out of stern justice for such egregious crimes. Where Roosevelt and other Allied leaders saw war criminals, Dulles saw potential spies to be rescued.

Talbot devotes several chapters to Dulles’s cooperation with and protection of the Nazis. One chapter is devoted to Dulles’s bringing the “Gehlen organization” into the fold of U.S. intelligence, with dubious results.

And, Talbot describes how James Angleton appeared to have blackmailed his way into his position of Chief of Counterintelligence by promising not to expose Dulles’s hiding of Nazi funds. That would explain how Angleton rose to such a key position despite his dubious fitness for the job. The paranoid Angleton ruined the lives of many intelligence officers whom he suspected falsely of being foreign spies, while missing the fact that his good friend in British intelligence, Kim Philby, was a Soviet double-agent. But Allen Dulles was ever Angleton’s protector.

Due to the scope of the topics covered, Talbot is necessarily unable to go in great depth into any of them. His coverage of the Hiss case feels superficial to one who has read a great deal on the subject. For example, Talbot speculates that Alger Hiss, a senior State Department official accused of spying for the Soviets, didn’t want to recognize Whittaker Chambers, the chief witness against him, because the two had perhaps engaged in a homosexual liaison.

While that may be true, I’ve always found Hiss’s own reasons compelling: Chambers had gone by another name when he had first known him; it had been many years since they had met; and Chambers’s weight had changed dramatically. That seems to better explain why Hiss claimed he didn’t know Chambers until he had a face-to-face meeting with him. Then, he recognized his long-ago tenant.

Talbot sprinkles a little sexual innuendo throughout the book. Personally, I find that takes away from the telling of history because anyone can say anything about someone else when the person is no longer alive to dispute it. In most cases, these suspicions are neither provable nor relevant. Fortunately, these are minimal interruptions to the overall tale.

Talbot makes a compelling argument that a lot of the abuses of the intelligence apparatus that we are dealing with now had their genesis under Allen Dulles’s version of the CIA. He traces the notion that the CIA is “above the law” and unanswerable to oversight to the McCarthy hearings, where Dulles earned the undying loyalty of the CIA by refusing to turn over Sen. Joe McCarthy’s targets for questioning.

McCarthy was clearly overreaching in his pursuit of suspected Communists and homosexuals – as alleged national security threats – but there should have been another way to deal with that than by claiming the CIA was above the law. That single act of defiance, perhaps more than anything else, paved the way to the egregious CIA abuses that have occurred in the years since, including the illegal wiretapping of elected officials, opening them up to blackmail.

In another part of the book, Talbot details the rise of Nixon under, in part, Dulles’s sponsorship. Most of us know that Nixon received illegal campaign donations when he was running for president. But Nixon also shook down those who wanted him to run for Congress, claiming he couldn’t afford to live on the salary of a Congressman and that he’d need supplementary income if he were to run. These are the kinds of juicy details Talbot’s book provides in spades.

As CIA Director

President Dwight Eisenhower appointed Dulles as the fifth CIA director – and the first civilian director – in 1953, but, as Talbot makes clear, Dulles overrode some of Eisenhower’s wishes by collaborating with his brother, John Foster Dulles, who was Secretary of State. By and large, Eisenhower was okay with letting the Dulles brothers run U.S. overt and covert foreign policy as they helped shape the worsening Cold War.

Their hard-line anti-communism and sympathy for colonialism included organizing coups in Iran in 1953 and in Guatemala in 1954 and blocking a political settlement of the Vietnam conflict that would have involved elections leading to the likely victory of Ho Chi Minh. (John Foster Dulles died in 1959. The international airport outside Washington D.C. is named in his honor.)

One chapter focuses on the killing of “dangerous ideas” in the form of a lecturer at Columbia University, Jesús Galíndéz. He and compatriots had fought in the Spanish Civil War and fled to the Dominican Republic, only to find that they had “left Franco’s frying pan and landed in Trujillo’s fire.” Galíndéz later escaped the Dominican Republic for America and wrote a damning 750-page essay called “The Era of Trujillo,” as his PhD thesis.

Talbot reveals the role of CIA operative Robert Maheu and ex-FBI agent John Frank in the kidnapping of Galíndéz and his delivery to Trujillo, who tortured him, boiled him alive and fed him to the sharks. With the help of Dulles’s CIA, Galíndéz died in 1956.

Talbot also argues that the CIA was “too modest” when it claimed it was not responsible for the death of Congolese independence leader Patrice Lumumba who was assassinated just days before John Kennedy was inaugurated in 1961. The CIA basically handed Lumumba over to the people who killed him, making the Agency, at the very least, strong accessories to the plot, and hardly the failed-plot-bystanders, the story that CIA officials sold to the Church Committee.

Though Eisenhower had given the Dulles brothers a long leash for their foreign policy schemes, President John F. Kennedy had different ideas. As president, he wanted to run his own foreign policy, and this deeply rankled Allen Dulles. However, in his first months in office, Kennedy acquiesced to the failed Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba in April 1961. Furious that he let the CIA sell him on the scheme that was hatched under Eisenhower, Kennedy vowed to rein in the freewheeling CIA.

Dulles hadn’t had to answer to anyone for a long time. But his sloppy Bay of Pigs operation cost him all credibility with Kennedy, who took the high road publicly, refusing to blame the CIA outright. But in private, he made it clear the Agency was not to be trusted and that he wanted to shatter it into a million pieces. The enmity between the pair grew.

Allen Dulles also defied Kennedy’s wishes when the President promoted an opening to the Left in Italy. Under Dulles, the CIA continued working against those same forces while supporting the Right as the spy agency and its predecessor, the OSS, had done since World War II.

Attorney General Robert Kennedy was so suspicious of Dulles’s secret reach that – after the Bay of Pigs fiasco – he found Dulles’s sister working in the State Department and had her fired. President Kennedy ousted Dulles in November 1961, replacing him with John McCone.

But Dulles did not go quietly into the cold night, as Talbot tells it, but ran, essentially, a government in exile from his home on the Potomac. Talbot details some of the comings and goings and how Dulles may have used his own book tour to help plan and plot the assassination of President Kennedy.

The JFK Assassination

Toward the end of the book, Talbot focuses nearly as much on President Kennedy and the plot to assassinate him as he does on Allen Dulles, with mixed results. While Talbot has the facts right in the broad strokes, if not all the small details, his focus was, in my opinion, a tad misplaced in spots. For example, he appears to believe E. Howard Hunt’s deathbed “confession,” which many in the research community do not.

Hunt, a career intelligence officer who became infamous as a leader of Nixon’s Watergate burglary team, implicated President Lyndon B. Johnson in the plot to kill Kennedy, which has never made sense to me. If LBJ was so ruthless that he killed his way to the presidency, why did he decide not to run again in 1968? Historically, when people have killed their way to the throne, they do not voluntarily abdicate it.

And Hunt’s “confession” seemed motivated more by the goal of leaving his family a little money after his death than by a desire to tell the truth. Indeed, even Talbot is puzzled at things Hunt appears not to know that he would necessarily have known had he been privy to the inner workings of the plot.

Clearly, Talbot focuses on Hunt because of Hunt’s well-documented long-term friendship with Dulles. And, I do believe, from my own research, that Hunt was likely in Dallas on Nov. 22, 1963, presumably as paymaster, his usual role in operations, based in large part on the fuller evidence from which Talbot created his abbreviated summary on that point. But I’m not persuaded, by this presentation or my other research, that Hunt knew the details of the actual plot.

From my own 25-plus years of research into the documentary record of the Kennedy assassination, I have come to believe it more likely that Richard Helms, James Angleton and David Atlee Phillips were the top plotters, not Dulles. But, to Talbot’s point, all of these men were beholden, at different levels, to Dulles; in fact, Angleton carried Dulles’s ashes at his funeral in 1969.

David Atlee Phillips gained power in the CIA because of his successful operations during the 1954 overthrow of Arbenz in Guatemala under Dulles. Helms was apparently insulated from the Bay of Pigs disaster in April 1961, perhaps by Dulles to keep a loyal person at the upper echelon of the CIA.

Given the hostility between Dulles and Kennedy, it remains a historical anomaly that Dulles managed to finagle his way onto the official investigation of Kennedy’s assassination. In that position, Allen Dulles was more responsible than anyone for the deliberate obfuscations of the Warren Commission. Dulles spent more minutes working for the commission than any other member. I agree with Talbot that the body should more appropriately have been named “the Dulles Commission.”

Talbot repudiated the recently resurfaced canard that Robert Kennedy had asked LBJ to appoint Dulles to the commission, a point lawyer and former House Select Committee investigator Dan Hardway has also recently made in detail recently with additional evidence. (See Section VIII in Hardway’s article “Thank you, Phil Shenon.”)

Dulles really did have ties to the family of Ruth and Michael Paine, the couple that housed the Oswalds in the months before the assassination. And Dulles really did monitor New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison’s case against Clay Shaw through the man Garrison had hired to provide “security,” Gordon Novel.

One of the most interesting people Talbot examined in the latter part of his book was JFK adviser and historian Arthur Schlesinger, who apparently had a distaste for Dulles and the CIA’s actions professionally while maintaining a personal and even warm relationship with Dulles – though Schlesinger came to question that friendship in later years.

One of Talbot’s chapters, “I can’t look and I won’t look,” is named for something Schlesinger said when confronted with evidence of conspiracy in the Kennedy assassination. Here was a man so wedded to his circle that he did not want to believe someone he knew and admired could be responsible for such a heinous crime.

Toward the end of his life, Schlesinger reflected on his “truce” and friendship with Dulles’s protégé Richard Helms and later CIA Director William Casey. Talbot quoted Schlesinger as saying, “I did wonder at one’s [meaning his own] capacity to continue liking people who have been involved in wicked things. … Is this deplorable weakness? Or commendable tolerance?”

The same must be asked of the public’s tolerance of secret operations that run counter to the principles of democracy in an open society. Is it commendable to tolerate assassinations and the darker deeds in the name of preserving the republic, or, more accurately, protecting the holdings of corporate leaders in the republic, or is it our weakness, as citizens of a democratic republic, that we have not raised our voices in protest of a secret, parallel government that has and no doubt will continue to pursue an independent path, out of control of our democracy?

That is the question that Talbot’s book asks between the lines. The Devil’s Chessboard gives us essential information to ponder before we make our answer.

Lisa Pease is a writer who has examined issues ranging from the Kennedy assassination to voting irregularities in recent U.S. elections.

SOURCE: https://consortiumnews.com/2015/10/27/checkmate-on-the-devils-chessboard/

ConsortiumNews allows DU to post entire articles.
Ms. Pease spoke at Duquesne conference on "Soft Power.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024024545

Talbot makes a strong case that Allen Dulles was “the architect” of the assassination of President Kennedy. I agree.


Lonestarblue

(10,579 posts)
50. Thank you for the recommendation and the review. I'll definitely add The Devil's Chessboard
Sat Dec 10, 2022, 03:49 PM
Dec 2022

to my reading list.

Kid Berwyn

(15,691 posts)
43. New light on the subject...
Sat Dec 10, 2022, 02:33 PM
Dec 2022
Nazi Billionaires: The Dark History of Germany’s Wealthiest Dynasties.

By David de Jong.

From Kirkus Reviews:

An unflattering investigative history of German big business over the past century.

Financial journalist de Jong reminds us that many of today’s superwealthy Germans are heirs of entrepreneurs whose companies prospered under the Third Reich through use of slave labor and seizure of companies. This is old news, but de Jong explores how all walked free after the war and their heirs do little to acknowledge their ancestors’ crimes. Few entrepreneurs paid attention to Hitler until he grew powerful after 1930. Some became ardent Nazis, but most approved of his hatred of socialism, worker activism, and democracy. Once Hitler began rearming, they scrambled for contracts, which involved currying favor with Nazi leaders. An enormous source of profit was Jewish businesses, often acquired for a pittance. Readers searching for an industrialist who disapproved will come up empty. As de Jong shows, nearly everyone approved of the methods of the business community. Orders increased, and a flood of slave laborers from the conquered countries poured into the factories. Though most “employees” were treated horribly, few employers objected. During the final year of the war, companies continued to sell their products and overwork their laborers even as the Allies overran Germany. Then they made themselves scarce. Their activities were no secret to Allied intelligence, but the first Nuremberg trial involved major political figures rather than business owners. Later, the trials of businessmen received little publicity and largely flopped, handing out a few short prison sentences and fines. It’s to de Jong’s credit that he brings many of these events back into the historical spotlight. The defendants mostly kept their businesses, handing them on to heirs, who were not inclined to discuss the wartime years. As decades passed, a good deal of dirt turned up, persuading some to apologize and make modest gestures of restitution, but others stonewalled. The author recounts perhaps more details on German business dealings than American readers may seek, but there is enough chicanery to maintain interest.

A sturdy account of the financial side of Nazi evil that resonates today.

https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/david-de-jong/nazi-billionaires-dynasties/

modrepub

(3,525 posts)
3. If You're Rich or Connected
Sat Dec 10, 2022, 10:44 AM
Dec 2022

The justice system has always treated you different. That's been going on for a long, long time. What TFG has done (literally for his entire life) exemplifies what's wrong with our society.

Literally, the path of justice is multi-directional; the outcome is preordained by your socioeconomic (and to some extent, racial) position within this society. Not always, but most times.

Farmer-Rick

(10,430 posts)
12. No American is above the law
Sat Dec 10, 2022, 11:35 AM
Dec 2022

Except for the filthy rich; their stooges and monsters sometimes too.

Capitalism which allows these corporate monsters to buy anything and everything, is why America is falling apart. From time to time, America will put a patch on capitalism's tears, holes and unraveling of democracy. But then allow capitalism to destroy again.

Cyrano

(15,129 posts)
15. Really makes one wonder if Darwin was right about evolution.
Sat Dec 10, 2022, 11:54 AM
Dec 2022

Seems to be a race between humanity evolving to a state of sanity, or destroying ourselves before we get there.

I_UndergroundPanther

(12,611 posts)
54. What if we did something other than capitalism?
Sat Dec 10, 2022, 06:59 PM
Dec 2022

Or we could follow through and tax the income, total wealth ,capital gains,and inheritance ,and property of these poisonous people . Than hire enough I R S
people and lawyers sick of corruption to comb through all these oligarch monsters records including off shore assets. Have an oversight committee to make sure no one doing the audits are bought off..all accountable to each other.

And make the pigs pay up that money or lose thier business charters and be barred from ever having a business again
every single one of them . If they don't cooperate put them in the poor people's jail for life no exceptions no plea bargains,no parole, in solitary so they cannot manipulate the public or talk to thier corrupt associates with no way out until they die.. and enforce it ruthlessly and give them no pity.

Problem is we need a strong charismatic good person to head this thing . Someone who prides themselves on having integrity that cannot be bought,who is fearless and relentless,and will do what must be done to get these over wealthy assholes under control.

They need to pick people to help also who are honest,can't be bought who are also fearless and relentless.

They all must desire equality,dispise nazis and hate the abuse of power.

Is there anyone like this in this world?

Farmer-Rick

(10,430 posts)
55. Many countries evolved away from feudalism and slavery
Mon Dec 12, 2022, 11:59 AM
Dec 2022

Some even had wars over it.

So maybe the world will do it again and evolve away from capitalism into a better economic structure. Democracy was a good idea for a government but we left in place an economic system that was very feudal and not democratic.

SoCalDavidS

(9,999 posts)
7. You're Reading The Wrong Threads
Sat Dec 10, 2022, 11:08 AM
Dec 2022

There are still those who expect TFG to be arrested, dragged away in cuffs, and put in jail for the rest of his life.

CrispyQ

(36,834 posts)
13. It was hard to do, but I've come to terms with the fact that Trump will never be held accountable.
Sat Dec 10, 2022, 11:36 AM
Dec 2022

I had a little hope until the classified documents case. As a country & a party we look weak, stupid, & foolish, letting this traitor walk free, conduct rallies, & run for president again. I'll continue to vote straight ticket dem, but without any enthusiasm & no more money to any candidates.

childfreebychoice

(476 posts)
18. We used to give to red states like fl, Ohio, and tx, in hopes that they would see the light
Sat Dec 10, 2022, 12:04 PM
Dec 2022

No more. The voters have spoken, they like living under rethug authorization/theocracy. Will cont to support former home state of Md, but we are done dumping money into the abyss. Red state voters...pull yourselves up by own bootstraps

Lonestarblue

(10,579 posts)
32. I still have some hope that Smith will indict him, but my confidence is low.
Sat Dec 10, 2022, 12:51 PM
Dec 2022

Obviously, most people on DU believe it is a mistake not to hold Trump accountable for January 6 and his theft of classified documents. I applaud those who can maintain their belief that justice will prevail, and I sincerely hope their faith is rewarded.

While I think not indicting Trump sends a very bad message that indeed some people are above the law, I also worry about the message that would be sending to allies and to people around the world who would see the US as just another corrupt country where the only things that matter are wealth and power. Not a good look for our democratic principles.

Kablooie

(18,675 posts)
14. We've heard he's in big trouble now and is about to be indicted.
Sat Dec 10, 2022, 11:40 AM
Dec 2022

He hasn’t been indicted.
No matter how big the crime and how obvious the evidence it never goes farther than an investigation. Then poof!

For years and years he’s been on the edge of being indicted any day now.

TRUMP WILL NEVER BE INDICTED FOR ANYTHING!!!
EVER!!
JUST ACCEPT IT.

childfreebychoice

(476 posts)
19. Never thought Mueller would save us, and agree, t* will die at home,
Sat Dec 10, 2022, 12:06 PM
Dec 2022

In his own bed. Stopped looking for equal justice, and I sleep much better

dlk

(11,718 posts)
17. There has always been a double standard of justice
Sat Dec 10, 2022, 12:00 PM
Dec 2022

Throughout history, money and connections have bought favors. All we can do is work toward a more perfect version of justice. Make no mistake though, the work is never done.

Orrex

(63,457 posts)
21. I've been scolded many times for observing that fact
Sat Dec 10, 2022, 12:09 PM
Dec 2022

I could almost accept that Trump will escape monthly unscathed, if only certain people would stop catapulting the propaganda about “equal justice under the law,” when we daily see proof to the contrary.

I expect that a few will jump in to scold me once again, in fact.

Orrex

(63,457 posts)
28. I have had posts hidden for referring to "cheerleaders"
Sat Dec 10, 2022, 12:42 PM
Dec 2022

So perhaps you’d like to rethink your phrasing, while you’re explicitly proving my point for me.

Response to Orrex (Reply #28)

ancianita

(36,566 posts)
39. Ah, I see. Now I see what you meant by scold.
Sat Dec 10, 2022, 01:29 PM
Dec 2022

At first I thought you were implying you'd Alert me. Sorry. I realize damage is done but I'll just delete my post anyway.

ancianita

(36,566 posts)
22. Don't FUD me, bro'.
Sat Dec 10, 2022, 12:14 PM
Dec 2022

In the last ten days:

Former Navy Sailor Sentenced for Producing Images of Child Sexual Abuse

Ex-Wall Street Trader Convicted of Fraud in Precious Metals Spoofing Scheme

New Jersey Electronics Businessman Pleads Guilty to Filing False Tax Return

New Jersey Business Owner Sentenced to Five Years of Incarceration for Defrauding Over 75 Victims of More Than $2.7 Million in Nationwide Scheme to Sell Fraudulent Coronavirus Disinfectant Products

Jury Convicts Former Federal Prison Warden for Sexual Abuse of Three Female Inmates

Three Health Care Providers Agree to Pay $22.5 Million for Alleged False Claims to California’s Medicaid Program

Eleventh Defendant Pleads Guilty in $15 Million Scheme to Defraud Spanish-Speaking United States Immigrants

Former Correctional Officer Sentenced for Assaulting a Hawaii Inmate

Active Russian Agent Andrii Derkach Indicted for Scheme to Violate Sanctions in the United States

Seven Alabama Residents Sentenced for Felony Violations of the Animal Welfare Act, Ending One of the Largest Cockfighting Operations in the Country

Father and Son Sentenced for $1.7 Million COVID-19 Relief Fraud

Former Assistant Atlanta City Attorney and Police Officer Charged in $7 Million PPP Fraud Scheme

Criminal Charges Unsealed Against 12 Individuals in Wide-Ranging Scheme to Monopolize Transmigrante Industry and Extort Competitors Near U.S.-Mexico Border

Former Muncie, Indiana, Police Officer Pleads Guilty to Eleven Civil Rights and Obstruction Offenses for Assaulting Arrestees and Writing False Reports

Former Oklahoma Supervisory Correctional Officer Sentenced for Promoting White Supremacist Assault on Black Inmates and Ordering Other Abuse

ABB Agrees to Pay Over $315 Million to Resolve Coordinated Global Foreign Bribery Case

Alabama Defendant Sentenced to 60 Years and Ordered to Pay Over $950,000 in Restitution for Sex Trafficking Scheme Involving Forced Prostitution

Former Senior U.S. Navy Employee Sentenced for Bribery Conspiracy and Lying to Investigators

Mississippi Man Pleads Guilty to Federal Hate Crime for Cross Burning

Las Vegas Tax Preparer Sentenced to Prison for Multiple Fraud Schemes

Leader of International Drug Trafficking Organization Pleads Guilty to Cocaine Trafficking Conspiracy


https://www.justice.gov

Orrex

(63,457 posts)
23. Of those groups charged with fines...
Sat Dec 10, 2022, 12:25 PM
Dec 2022

How many were required to admit to wrongdoing? And how many saw jail time?

If the answer is anything other than “all of them,” then that simply proves the reality of our pro-wealthy justice system.

ancianita

(36,566 posts)
26. Check the page links. It explains everything. Take the first one, for example...
Sat Dec 10, 2022, 12:38 PM
Dec 2022
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/former-navy-sailor-sentenced-producing-images-child-sexual-abuse

Even if you could prove any "no wrongdoing" agreement -- which you won't find at the link -- the OP is wrong about "NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW" because of the factual record of arrests, convictions, sentencing that remain on a person(s) background, if they ever get background checked.

Anyone with common sense and knowledge of what the Justice Department, would rightly wonder how in hell anyone can call that a lie.

Fight to get Main Justice more funding. Lisa Monaco has hired over 130 more lawyers (this past April) on the Trump cases. Because by my count he's not above the 17 laws he broke. Garland has a badass from both the DOJ and the Hague on the Trump cases. AND his aiders and abettors.

Just because it's not the justice YOU want, or at the pace YOU want, doesn't mean justice isn't doing its job in the third biggest nation on the planet.

The FUD chorus here is just, "I want it NOW or you FAIL!" whining and bitching.

Orrex

(63,457 posts)
30. The OP engages in hyperbole, but the underlying point is the same
Sat Dec 10, 2022, 12:44 PM
Dec 2022

I have no interest in a line-by-line refutation of your pre-prepared Gish gallop.

The FUD chorus here is just, "I want it NOW or you FAIL!" whining and bitching
The phrasing of this deliberate mischaracterization tells us a great deal about you, by the way.

And you’ve once again proven my point. Thanks!

ancianita

(36,566 posts)
31. No, it doesn't. It makes a claim. Only children engage in hyperbole about adult matters like LAW.
Sat Dec 10, 2022, 12:50 PM
Dec 2022

The Department of Justice's conviction record is a Gish gallop? You might as well be saying, "I'm grown enough to refuse to do my homework!" Pure laziness and bullshit.


This is a "sense of justice" grievance thread. In a General Discussion thread you get discussion. The fact that you refuse to use fact to base your claim says "a great deal about you, by the way," -- that you refuse to discuss.

Orrex

(63,457 posts)
36. I don't refuse to discuss it.
Sat Dec 10, 2022, 01:16 PM
Dec 2022

I choose not discuss it with you, however, and not because I’m overwhelmed by the strength of your argument.

I’ve also had posts hidden for questioning a DUer’s age or maturity, but apparently you’re held to a different standard.

Nothing further is to be gained from suffering through your posts.

Cyrano

(15,129 posts)
42. You really should read post #5 and the links it provides.
Sat Dec 10, 2022, 02:26 PM
Dec 2022

"Justice" is an abstract concept. But I defy anyone to demonstrate that our "system" doesn't favor the rich over the poor, the haves overt the have nots, the white over the black, and the connected over the basic peon.

If you're trying to make the case that "Everyone is equal under the law in America," you've carved out quite a mission. Trump isn't the first/only thug to "get away with everything," and he won't be the last. Thousands like him probably exist out there today, and post #5 just touches the surface of the hypocrisy. Nowhere in the world is "Everyone is equal under the law" a reality. We humans have a long way to go before we "grow up." And right now, our destruction of our home planet seems to indicate that we won't get the chance to "grow up."

ancianita

(36,566 posts)
44. I will, thanks.
Sat Dec 10, 2022, 03:08 PM
Dec 2022

Justice is not abstract. It is rule of law intended to both prevent and prosecute "loss, harm or damage" to humans. Of course the hardest recourse is for humans already born into unequal income classes and structures to afford to pay for their recourse. 10% of most law firms' budgets are set aside for pro bono work for that reason. And of course, given the size of our nation's problems, that's not enough; which is why there are huge legal orgs like the ACLU, NLG, and so many others.

Justice as concrete recourse has been structurally hobbled by politically motivated funding. It's been muddled by corporate insurgence into constitutional law. Yet justice is as essential to a strong society as is a military. Yet the two have always been funded unequally.

I don't have to make the case that " Everyone is equal under the law in America" when our Democratic leaders say it and make the case for it, and work to make it real all the time.

Just because the funding, pace, and outcomes aren't perfect, or to our liking, doesn't mean that when our leaders make the case for, or even SAY, " Everyone is equal under the law in America" that it's a lie. Neither does any history of failed justice prove that statement is a lie.

The LIE part is what bothers me. It's not just provocation. It's denigration of our elected leaders and Department of Justice who believe it, and work toward its concrete adherence as their calling.

We on DU must not denigrate the imperfections of rule of law as a lie perpetrated upon the People. If we don't "grow up" about what we call empowerment through justice, you're right -- we won't "grow up" about corporate capture, covid, ecosystem destruction or even envisioning the futures our descendants deserve.

But the thing about growing up is that it's not about 'getting the chance.'
It's about deciding to make the disciplined effort about what we call adult systems; deciding not to just "get a chance," but deciding to leave nothing to chance.

In other words, to make our own chance. That right there precludes energy draining namecalling, grievance airing and general FUD bitching. We often reference the "adults in the room" because we easily see people of the opposing party who refuse to grow up about all kinds of things -- like committing to truth, lifelong learning, how government and governing work to do the greatest good for the greatest number, supporting collective solutions to big system problems, etc.

Feel down, but know we're not out. Know that "no one is above the law" is daily proven true more than not. The daily court wins of millions upon millions of fraudulent money gained back to our covid and PPP budgets, the millions in monies returned across business frauds, all that's just the "making whole" part of enforcing rule of law.

Because of that concrete enforcement of justice the criminal element of scofflaws, outlaws and "aboves" keep learning the hard way that it's true.

In an imperfect democracy full of imperfect humans, I will err on the side of our elected officials and Department of Justice lawyers who believe it, work for it and literally, concretely, prove it every damn day.

ancianita

(36,566 posts)
46. Then you don't understand a thing I've said.
Sat Dec 10, 2022, 03:21 PM
Dec 2022

Your choice to believe what you want to believe. I don't yearn.

In the adult world there is no yearning or worlds at the end of rainbows.

I'm a realist. I know the concreteness of what "no one is above the law" really is.

MarcA

(2,195 posts)
34. He will pay fines, lose lawsuits, maybe go bankrupt.
Sat Dec 10, 2022, 12:54 PM
Dec 2022

If he is ever sentenced to prison, he will try and escape to a friendly country or go to jail for Show for a short period of time and when he gets out will be even more of a grifter playing on his victimhood.

Tommymac

(7,263 posts)
35. Listen to Rachel Maddow's Podcast 'ULTRA'. Politics IS above the Law. Always has been. Nothing new.
Sat Dec 10, 2022, 01:04 PM
Dec 2022

This details the 1940's attempt at a Nazi coup in the US and how politically powerful RW Senators and Congress folks avoided the attempts to try and convict them. They made the DOJ look like their puppet.

Every US Citizen should listen to this great podcast - it plays like 'Law & Order' or other law TV show - very very entertaining. And totally scary too.

But don't despair - she tells us how We The People can mitigate shit like this in the end. Activism.

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-presents-ultra

Our system is not broken, this is by design. The Founders DID NOT WANT DIRECT DEMOCRACY and also wanted to protect their 'Class' (Planters).

That said, IMO our system with all it's flaws is still the best compared to fascism, feudalism, monarchies, and other authoritarian systems.

ancianita

(36,566 posts)
38. Re ULTRA's lesson and "how We The People can mitigate shit like this in the end. Activism."
Sat Dec 10, 2022, 01:18 PM
Dec 2022

I listened to all the ULTRA episodes and the lesson was more specific. Voting.

The lesson was that those who thought they were above the law were voted out under voting law.
Voting is The People's Jury.

So far, that law has worked when Americans are made aware of the facts and the law. For all the political suppressions of past DOJs, voters have come through enough to keep this democracy working for centuries.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
48. The acceptance implicit in this title is a huge part of the reason
Sat Dec 10, 2022, 03:27 PM
Dec 2022

it is so often effectively the case.

I have never said such a thing. But then no one is above the law to me and those like me. Ever.

It's a basic principle. And the bigger their duty to us, the more they should fear us.

brooklynite

(95,711 posts)
51. "they'd be in prison at this very moment."
Sat Dec 10, 2022, 03:58 PM
Dec 2022

And how long, precisely, would you have allowed AG Garland to investigate and craft a case?

Indictments in Watergate took 2 years (without an angry blogosphere).

GoldandSilver

(186 posts)
52. If you believe "No one is above the law" you haven't paid attention.
Sat Dec 10, 2022, 06:04 PM
Dec 2022

There are rich, powerful people (men) that can get away with the most incredible things, and then there are the rest of us. The Orange guy wasn’t kidding when he said he could shoot someone on a crowded street in New York City and no one would care. He firmly believes he is above the law and apparently, many people agree with him.

Some people (men) have lied, cheated, and bullied their way into power positions and they wreak havoc on societies around the world.

In America, that injustice will remain until we decide to reject it, but no one has yet. We choose to live the lie and the rich and powerful are protected and the rest of us stand and watch and wait for someone else to clean up our “democracy”.

Kid Berwyn

(15,691 posts)
53. The Banksters Run Free
Sat Dec 10, 2022, 06:10 PM
Dec 2022

All they did was rip off $ trillions in 2008 (like they did to the S&Ls in 1991). Written at the time:

Know your BFEE: Phil Gramm, the Meyer Lansky of the War Party, Set-Up the Biggest Bank Heist Ever.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x4055207

It got put back, though — by the US taxpayer.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The REAL Big Lie is: "No ...