Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJudge Luttig joining the fight at SCOTUS against the Independent state legislatures farce
Link to tweet
https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/the-conservative-stalwart-challenging-the-far-right-legal-theory-that-could-subvert-american-democracy
No paywall
https://archive.ph/FV7Mc
A powerful new litigant has joined one of the most momentous cases slated to be heard by the Supreme Court this term. The respondents in the case of Moore v. Harper filed a brief today that included a surprising new signatory: J. Michael Luttig, who has been known for years as perhaps the most conservative Republican judge in the country. Now, though, he has joined a coalition of veteran lawyers and nonpartisan government-watchdog groups who are fighting against a far-right Republican election-law challengeone so radical that critics say it has the potential to end American democracy as we know it.
The former judge is a surprising co-counsel to Neal Katyal, the well-known Supreme Court litigator. Katyal is a counsel of record in the case for several respondents opposing the far-right groups, including Common Cause and the North Carolina League of Conservation Voters. The case is scheduled to be heard by the Court on December 7th. Luttig told me that he signed on as Katyals co-counsel because he regards Moore v. Harper as without question the most significant case in the history of our nation for American democracy. Putting it more colloquially, he said, Legally, its the whole ballgame.
Having such a well-known conservative former jurist argue against the election-law challenge may carry some weight with the conservative super-majority on the Court, several of whom have ties to Luttig that stretch back decades. Justice Clarence Thomas, for instance, was personally shepherded through his contentious Supreme Court confirmation hearings by Luttig in 1991. At the time, Luttig served as the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Office of Legal Counsel in George H. W. Bushs Justice Department. After Thomas was confirmed, Luttig himself was sworn in to a seat on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit at the age of thirty-seven; he became, at that moment, the youngest federal appellate judge in the country.
Luttigs ties to Chief Justice John Roberts also go back years. The two worked closely together in the Reagan Administration as young lawyers, both under the tutelage of then White House Counsel Fred Fielding, and again together as lawyers in the George H. W. Bush Department of Justice. Later, in 2005, George W. Bush considered them simultaneously for a seat on the Supreme Court, which ultimately went to Roberts. The following month, Bush again considered Luttig for a Supreme Court seat but chose Samuel Alito. After establishing a reputation as a hard-right standard-bearer in the mold of the late Antonin Scalia on the appeals court, Luttig became the general counsel of Boeing; in 2020, he retired.
*snip*
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 861 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (23)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge Luttig joining the fight at SCOTUS against the Independent state legislatures farce (Original Post)
Nevilledog
Oct 2022
OP
It is a stupid, contorted, suicidal interpretation of the Constitution, thus a risk by the Extremes.
Hermit-The-Prog
Oct 2022
#3
Cha
(299,113 posts)1. Rt TY Judge Luttig💕🤷♂️ nt
DFW
(54,834 posts)2. Although it was Bush who appointed Alito, I think it was Cheney who chose him.
I think Citizens United was already in the planning stages when Roberts and Alito were appointed, and both were probably grilled as to whether they would uphold such a statute if they were on the Court. When they said absolutely, their appointments were secured.
Hermit-The-Prog
(34,056 posts)3. It is a stupid, contorted, suicidal interpretation of the Constitution, thus a risk by the Extremes.
Fiendish Thingy
(15,839 posts)4. That's the kind of bipartisanship I can get behind! Nt
LetMyPeopleVote
(147,186 posts)5. This is a team of heavy hitters
LetMyPeopleVote
(147,186 posts)6. For this thread