Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BootinUp

(47,221 posts)
Mon Oct 10, 2022, 10:12 PM Oct 2022

retired Major Myka Tyry on the Crimea Bridge blast. @ChrisO_wiki

ChrisO
@ChrisO_wiki

1/ Finland's national broadcaster Yle has published an interesting interview with an explosive ordnance disposal expert, retired Major Myka Tyry of the Finnish Defence Forces, on the Crimea Bridge blast. He makes a number of points I've not seen elsewhere.






2/ Tyry estimates that the explosives used "may have weighed between one and two thousand kilograms" (2,200-4,400 lb) but was "not a conventional mixture of fuel oil and ammonium nitrate, but something of much higher quality".

3/ He also points out that it wasn't just a big fireball, but was followed by "flaming torches in the air ... This suggests the use of combustible metals such as aluminium, magnesium or thermite to amplify the explosion."

4/ "In such an explosion, the burning metals spread over a much wider area than just the usual large fireball. That would explain how a train dozens of metres away caught fire from the explosion."

5/ Tyry suggests that the explosive payload may have included Russian-made thermite incendiaries. (The Russians have used these extensively in Ukraine, and the Ukrainians have captured unfired Russian thermite rockets; see thread below on this topic.)

6/ He also comments that the explosion likely happened on the bridge deck, with "little air between the explosives and the deck. For example, exactly the height of the truck."

7/ He points to a lack of water disturbance as evidence against the possibilities of a boat bomb or sabotage of the bridge structure. An explosion at sea level would have caused a spout of water, he says, but this isn't visible in the published videos.

8/ He also points to the location of the visible damage: "If the explosive had been placed below the deck of the bridge, then there would have been no scorch marks from the explosion on the railings of the adjacent car lane."

9/ "Likewise, the 'flares' would have flown upwards, not downwards and sideways as they did in the explosion."

Interview is linked below (h/t @m5b71) – I'd be interested to see if any other EOD people have commented on this yet. /end

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1579480666282287104.html
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
retired Major Myka Tyry on the Crimea Bridge blast. @ChrisO_wiki (Original Post) BootinUp Oct 2022 OP
Two theories James48 Oct 2022 #1
The train was stationary at the time as far as I know. So not too hard to time BootinUp Oct 2022 #3
How come our generals don't look like Viggo Mortensen? Gaugamela Oct 2022 #2
I had the same thought. Irish_Dem Oct 2022 #5
Lots of interesting threads nested in the conversation. K&R crickets Oct 2022 #4

James48

(4,444 posts)
1. Two theories
Mon Oct 10, 2022, 10:25 PM
Oct 2022

It’s possible the truck was carrying sone of those the emote rockets, and simply exploded whilst on the bridge.

I’m more inclined to think it also might have been a charge in a train car, because I can’t fathom the likelihood of a blowing up truck going off exactly when in the middle of a train along side.

Unless it was a driver activated truck bomb based of a load of thermite missiles.

BootinUp

(47,221 posts)
3. The train was stationary at the time as far as I know. So not too hard to time
Mon Oct 10, 2022, 10:34 PM
Oct 2022

really.

Seems likely to me that it was remotely triggered by someone within visual distance and the driver was just collateral damage.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»retired Major Myka Tyry o...