General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJustice Alito's Crusade Against a Secular America Isn't Over
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2022/09/05/justice-alitos-crusade-against-a-secular-america-isnt-overNo paywall
https://archive.ph/nx2kf
Some baby boomers were permanently shaped by their participation in the countercultural protests and the antiwar activism of the nineteen-sixties and seventies. Others were shaped by their aversion to those movements. Justice Samuel Alito belongs to the latter category. For many years, he lacked the power to do much about that profound distaste, and in any case he had a reputation for keeping his head down. When President George W. Bush nominated Alito to the Supreme Court, in 2005, many journalists portrayed him as a conservative but not an ideologue. The Times noted that legal scholars characterized his jurisprudence as cautious and respectful of precedent. Self-described liberals whod known himas an undergraduate at Princeton, as a law student at Yale, or in some later professional capacitysketched portraits of a quiet, methodical, reasonable man.
On the Court, even as Alitos opinions aligned consistently with the goals of the Republican Partyin particular, of social conservativesadmirers praised him as pragmatic and Burkean. According to a 2018 C-span/P.S.B. poll, he was the conservative Justice the fewest Americans could name, and for years he was overshadowed by his more flamboyant late colleague, Antonin Scalia; by Clarence Thomas, whose notorious confirmation hearings were followed by a rivetingly long silence on the bench; even by Neil Gorsuch, with his cussed libertarian streak. Richard Lazarus, a professor at Harvard Law School who has studied the Court, told me that in Alitos first years as a Justice he was known primarily as Chief Justice John Robertss right-hand mansomeone the Chief could assign to write an opinion that would not be too flashy or provocative, and that would keep five votes together when he couldnt trust Scalia to do it, because Scalia would swing for the fences and risk losing votes.
Now, though, Alito is the embodiment of a conservative majority that is ambitious and extreme. (He declined to be interviewed for this article.) With the recent additions of Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett to the Court, the conservative bloc no longer needs Roberts to get results. And Alito has taken a zealous lead in reversing the progressive gains of the sixties and early seventiesfrom overturning Roe v. Wade to stripping away voting rights. At a Yale Law School forum in 2014, he was asked to name a personality trait that had impeded his career. Alito responded that hed held his tongue too oftenthat it probably would have been better if I said a bit more, at various times. Hes holding his tongue no longer. Indeed, Alito now seems to be saying whatever he wants in public, often with a snide pugnaciousness that suggests his past decorum was suppressing considerable resentment.
Last term, Alito landed the reputation-defining assignment of writing the majority opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Womens Health Organization, which eliminated the constitutional right to abortion enshrined by Roe nearly fifty years ago. In May, a draft of his opinion was leaked, and from start to finish it sounded cantankerous and dismissive. Roe was egregiously wrong from the start, Alito declared. Its reasoning was exceptionally weak, and the decision has had damaging consequences. He likened Roe to Plessy v. Ferguson, the notorious decision upholding segregation; approvingly cited centuries-old common law categorizing a woman who received an abortion after quickening as a murderess; and used the inflammatory word personhood when describing fetal life.
*snip*
orthoclad
(2,910 posts)We're in trouble.
Fix this court!
EnergizedLib
(1,912 posts)Secular America is not afraid and will vote against and reject your decisions and vote for people who will expand, nominate judges, codify, etc.
No, what is egregiously wrong is Dobbs. Plessy restricted rights and freedoms, which is what Dobbs does. Brown acknowledged rights, just like Roe acknowledged the right to reproductive healthcare.
Rhetoric like yours is backfiring. You awoke some angry Americans, who have and will continue to respond accordingly at the ballot box.
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,626 posts)Mockalito, Robber Roberts, Uncle Clarence, Gory Sucker, Coathanger Barrett, and Beer Bong Weenie Waver need their power sapped before they impose their extreme ideological dystopia on the nation.
gab13by13
(21,560 posts)czarjak
(11,379 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)This article doesn't say outright that Alito's racist or misogynistic, just cites a few behaviors that suggest the Klan's side is represented:
In a 2011 article in the Times Magazine, Emily Bazelon noted that Alitos opinions occasionally display some empathy, but that it rarely extends to people who are not like him. This selective quality, she argued, offers an insight into conservative instincts about who deserves our solicitude. ...
While at the Solicitor Generals office, Alito wrote a memo defending police officers right to shoot fleeing suspects regardless of the threat they posed. The case involved a fifteen-year-old Black boy, Edward Garner, who, according to Alitos memo, was killed by a Memphis police officer who could see that his target did not appear to be armed.
Alito: Any rule permitting the use of deadly force to stop a fleeing suspect must rest on the general principle that the state is justified in using whatever force is necessary to enforce its laws. Assuming that a fleeing felony suspect is entirely rational . . . what he is saying in effect is: Kill me or allow me to escape, at least for now. If every suspect could evade arrest by putting the state to this choice, societal order would quickly break down.
And here's one of Alito's breathtakingly and cruelly dishonest, tRumpist-level descriptions of affirmative action: 'Alito, Fried recalled, came up with some choice lines, such as Henry Aaron would not be regarded as the all-time home run king, and he would not be a model for youth, if the fences had been moved in whenever he came to the plate.'
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,406 posts)Six of them conservative.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)I've been enjoying our DIL's special margaritas while we watch the children down in the river. Nice gathering, no close trumpist relatives. Happy Labor Day.
mopinko
(70,428 posts)yeah, this is def about the ppl afraid of free love and peace.
rubbersole
(6,791 posts)And is still unable to get over it. Also drunk with power.
mopinko
(70,428 posts)and you will hear the void laughing it's ass off at you.
rubbersole
(6,791 posts)women especially. And just getting started. I'm so glad Biden is there. Can you imagine...
COL Mustard
(6,020 posts)It would be great to keep both houses, but keeping the Senate is especially key given its advise and consent role with respect to judicial appointments. McConnell understood that in 2016, which is of course why we are where we are.
brush
(54,000 posts)right about now. They overreached and will pay.
SoCalDavidS
(9,998 posts)They don't regret a thing. They're just getting started.
They have a majority in place for perhaps the next 3 decades, and they're going to impose their will on America, whether we like it or not.
With the both sides Bullshit, unfortunately it won't be long until repubs gain power again. While I'd like to believe this will trigger years of Democratic rule, I fully realize that there are at least 35-40% of voters who will vote repub, NO MATTER WHAT. Along with Independents, who will believe whatever the media tells them, that puts them in the game to reach the 51% needed, along with the Bullshit Electoral College, and Gerrymandering, they'll take their chances.
In short, the future of America is Fucked. I wish it were otherwise, but that's the reality. I hope I'm able to escape America before things really spiral downhill.
brush
(54,000 posts)at their rights being snatched away by Dobbs get a chance to vote in the upcoming election.
You're aware Kansas voted recently to protect abortion rights, right? A Dem in a red NY district and so did a Dem in red Alaska.
Notice a trend? Hold your pessimism until ya see the election results.
SoCalDavidS
(9,998 posts)I'm hoping that 2022 keeps the trend going that started in 2020, with Democrats having momentum.
But even so, the Supreme Court is beyond reach, unless some of the right wing Justices start kicking the bucket, and several of them are young.
Buckeyeblue
(5,508 posts)Alito seems like he has lived a life of quiet boredom and he feels like he can strut a little now. This quiet boredom was molded by parents who insisted on academic perfection. It seems like rather than having fun, he preferred to sneer at fun from the sideline, but not because he was excluded but because his parents never taught him the importance of fun.
Regardless, his opinion to overturn Roe is one of the craziest things I've ever read. It's less legal opinion than it is manifesto. If it had been mailed in from some backwoods cabin, he would feel the need to worry about what actions the author may take.
At one point in the article, Alito reportedly told someone he taught himself constitutional law. I thought, yes and it shows.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Last edited Mon Sep 5, 2022, 09:41 AM - Edit history (1)
who intend to use their power to remake this nation against the will of the people. The Dobbs decision is a big clue to future aggression. It'll take some years to stop them no matter how we do it, and then more years to change course again.
This article makes Alito out a nasty piece of work as a person who is untethered by judicial principle; and coupled with his pattern of decisions and recent more outspoken revelations into angry and resentful character, and now a blatant, Pub-style liar, I'm inclined to believe he really is. Just a few clips:
As an appellate-court judge, he was the sole dissenter in a 1991 case that struck down a portion of a Pennsylvania law requiring women, with few exceptions, to notify their husbands before obtaining an abortion. ...
While at the Solicitor Generals office, Alito wrote a memo defending police officers right to shoot fleeing suspects regardless of the threat they posed. ... "Any rule permitting the use of deadly force to stop a fleeing suspect must rest on the general principle that the state is justified in using whatever force is necessary to enforce its laws." (My god! SCOTUS then disagreed.)
In environmental cases, according to a forthcoming law-review article by Lazarus, the Harvard Law professor, Alito has joined with the side supported by environmentalists only four out of thirty-eight times, making him the Justice least likely to do so. (And those votes came only in cases decided unanimously.) (!!!!!) ...
This (Alito's writing on Dobbs) was not a decision that is intended to convince anybody other than the folks who support its result. And I dont mean convince them that Alito and the other conservative Justices are rightI mean convince them that theyre principled.
How could anyone with an ounce of the "judicial temperament" a justice should have be universally hostile to voting rights and effectively vote against every environmental case he could? Or an ounce of humanity call for police execution of everyone who tries to run away?
My experience of extremists is, scratch them, and you uncover a bunch of things wrong with them.
leftyladyfrommo
(18,883 posts)they wrong.
We don't have a Supreme Court. We have a rightwing joke.
We need to keep cases in the lower courts.
hatrack
(59,612 posts). . . . and it's only getting worse.
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.