General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo, why isn't he arrested and charged now that evidence is in hand?
What has now been revealed in the DOJ Suppeano illustrates there is more than enough evidence to bring charges and make an arrest Prosecute immediately.
I don't remember Hansen being allowed to roam freely before bringing charges, once they busted him.
Trump has been BUSTED.
Arrest and Prosecute that treasonous bastard now.
Thomas Hurt
(13,903 posts)uponit7771
(90,371 posts)... holding Putin's Whore to account for the crimes she said he'd commit.
claudette
(3,640 posts)election or not. This is close to treason
triron
(22,031 posts)Continue to do damage. This seems insane to me.
SoCalDavidS
(9,998 posts)Unlike most here at DU, I STILL do not think he'll ever be indicted or face consequences.
uponit7771
(90,371 posts)... in a good way.
I just can't see the DOJ or the Biden admin saying to Putin's Whore ... oh well, that was bad and don't do it again ... after they laid their markers here recently.
BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)Marius25
(3,213 posts)special privileges.
I don't care what your formal title is, if anyone of us did a fraction of what Trump did, we'd be in prison for life. He should be arrested today and the fact that he hasn't been proves DoJ does not view everyone as equal under the law.
msfiddlestix
(7,289 posts)triron
(22,031 posts)jalan48
(13,916 posts)a former President.
ALBliberal
(2,362 posts)Irish_Dem
(48,097 posts)Sitting in a jail cell tends to focus the mind.
jalan48
(13,916 posts)arrested but I'm not sure the DOJ agrees.
Irish_Dem
(48,097 posts)dutch777
(3,062 posts)...Trump has habit of blabbering on and digging his hole deeper. Leaving him dangling in peril increases this likelihood. Smart criminals shut up and lay low. Trump is not smart.
msfiddlestix
(7,289 posts)not just for OZ but also, and most importantly for himself.
CrispyQ
(36,567 posts)Today would be a perfect day, going into a 3-day weekend.
Fix The Stupid
(951 posts)Just step back and look at the big picture here.
What has been the excuse in the US for decades when the US Gov't or it's agencies commit crimes or have knowledge of specific crimes?
All washed away in the name of "national security"...
Why are there still JFK files not being released? - "national security"
Why are there still 911 files not being released? - "national security"
So what does that exactly mean? In the above scenarios it means the truth is so awful, so unfathomable, that the general population cannot handle it. These decisions are being made out of fear and also to protect some "very important" people, organizations, countries, entities, whatever.
In my opinion, this is how the Trump crimes will be handled as well.
Their thinking will be along these lines:
- We simply cannot charge or prosecute a former president for ANYTHING. It will transmit the image to the world and America's enemies that we really are a 'weak nation' and it might hurt the 'economy' or our 'world standing' - in other words..."national security".
- If we prosecute Trump and his minions, then the next time the repubs have power they will turn over every stone on the dems for revenge...anything and everything will come out - again, not going to happen because of...wait for it.. "national security".
I hope I am wrong, but history shows this will be the probably outcome.
Sorry.
fightforfreedom
(4,913 posts)If Trump and his band of traitors are not prosecuted that will end our democracy. What they have done will become legal.
msfiddlestix
(7,289 posts)CrispyQ
(36,567 posts)However, if that's how they think our allies are going to react, they're dead wrong. They're already worried he'll get elected again. I believe the longer we let this guy walk free & shoot off his mouth the more respect we lose. And we risk the November election, too. No one can demoralize the dem base better than the dems.
I went from thinking he'll never be indicted, to a slim hope he might be, back to he won't be. Like you, I hope I'm wrong. Today would be a great day to arrest him, going into a 3-day weekend.
global1
(25,298 posts)If you're gonna commit a crime as a president - make sure it is big enough that it is so awful, so unfathomable, that the general population cannot handle it.
Call it a threat to National Security and just sweep it under the rug that we simply cannot charge or prosecute a former president for ANYTHING.
We don't want to transmit the image to the world and America's enemies that we really are a 'weak nation' cause it might hurt the 'economy' or our 'world standing' - in other words..."national security".
Tr**p skates again!!!!
Fix The Stupid
(951 posts)msfiddlestix
(7,289 posts)H2O Man
(73,709 posts)Oh my!
Or, for the heck of it, perhaps it is because no president has been a criminal as Trump. Granted, Nixon and VP Bush the Elder were crooks, in Watergate and Iran-Contra. But nothing like this. And, for example, at this time the DOJ-FBI are not allowed to use the documents found in furthering their investigation. That "hold" will remain if the Trump-appointed judge calls for a special master to review the documents. For this is, as Trump has always done when on the hot seat, simply a delay tactic.
global1
(25,298 posts)they treat him with 'kid gloves'.
EnergizedLib
(1,907 posts)Where are the documents? Who has them? You know somebody does, and lives are in danger.
This is far worse than a few emails.
Sneederbunk
(14,319 posts)MineralMan
(146,351 posts)Not yet. Once an indictment has been issued, there can be a warrant for his arrest. Until then, he is not charged with any crime. Not officially.
That's why. It's really simple. You can't arrest someone under federal law unless you catch them in the act of committing a felony or after a person has been indicted by a federal grand jury.
Due process.
msfiddlestix
(7,289 posts)do I iunderstand you correclly?
MineralMan
(146,351 posts)msfiddlestix
(7,289 posts)Not clear if he was indicted while incarcerated.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aldrich_Ames#Arrest
MineralMan
(146,351 posts)That matters.
msfiddlestix
(7,289 posts)triron
(22,031 posts)Dangerous than Ames.
Raven123
(4,937 posts)msfiddlestix
(7,289 posts)With this individual, the number of crimes and the scope alone would siggest a restult we cannot abide.
They have evidence in hand, to outright arrest and charge.
In the meantime they can continue investigations and levy more charges as each one is completed and determined.
Brainfodder
(6,424 posts)Well said and maybe the dunce is being used for more intel?
If they are preparing to take the whole web down, then wait we shall!
Marius25
(3,213 posts)People here like to defend Garland, but he's still allowing Trump to delay and get away with things no other person would ever get away with.
MOMFUDSKI
(5,811 posts)is above the law in this Country then what is the point of keeping this Democracy?
AngryOldDem
(14,061 posts)Thoroughly sick and tired of his ass.
lindysalsagal
(20,796 posts)I hope I'm wrong. But if they committed crimes, how can anyone seriously believe tfg didn't?
JustAnotherGen
(32,046 posts)Interesting weekend.
msfiddlestix
(7,289 posts)brooklynite
(95,012 posts)I want Garland and DOJ to take all the time needed to make it ironclad.
msfiddlestix
(7,289 posts)lees1975
(3,943 posts)in jail by now, held until trial without bail. Then all these legal shenanigans would quit and we could get on with prosecuting him.
Emile
(23,197 posts)slowly convince republicans Trump broke the law and is endangering our country security. I think he fears what Lindsey Graham is threatening.
onenote
(42,854 posts)and what impact it had on national security. Well, my guess is that DOJ and the intelligence agencies are looking into that as well, and want to put the stongest case, based on the most serious charges, before the grand jury rather than do it piecemeal.
Response to msfiddlestix (Original post)
traitorsgalore This message was self-deleted by its author.
triron
(22,031 posts)Polybius
(15,533 posts)Just be a little more patient, this will take some time.
LuckyCharms
(17,472 posts)The DOJ is going for the brass ring.