Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

louis-t

(23,295 posts)
2. Gorby didn't tear down the wall. Reagan didn't tear down the wall.
Wed Aug 31, 2022, 10:43 AM
Aug 2022

It didn't happen until at least a year after that speech. The people of East Germany tore down the wall. Gorby held back on stopping East Germans from protesting and he let the will of the people prevail.

unblock

(52,253 posts)
3. for those who think donnie marked a complete departure for the republican party,
Wed Aug 31, 2022, 11:00 AM
Aug 2022

their whole view of the wall thing showed, decades ago, many of the cultish problems that are now obvious.

ever since the end of wwii, republicans were united with democrats in the view that capitalism was inherently better than communism and that the soviet union would fall under its own weight because communism was simply an inferior system.

then, when the wall fell, the most obvious marker of the series of events that led to the fall of the soviet union, all of a sudden they switched to reagan-worship. it was his speech demanding the wall be torn down that finally did them in. who know all it took was just the right speech? as if eisenhower could have shut them down years earlier with a dramatic demand. oh, but obama only good at speeches and how could he be a good president.

what happened to all the rhetoric about capitalism being better? all in one moment they completely lost interest in giving capitalism any credit for being a better system. nope. it was all reagan's speech and i suppose, had he not said that, communism would have lasted another 100 years.

and of course, the media played along *and still* plays along, even on this same dumb talking point decades later.


unlike donnie, reagan was pretty aware and politically astute (well, until he wasn't). he saw, as many other people who were remotely paying attention, that the soviet union was spread too thin, had trouble at home, and was losing its grip on its satellite states, particularly east germany and poland. reagan knew, as many knew, that the wall was going to come down one way or another. he made a speech that would let him take credit from something that was going to happen anyway, without him, for many reasons having nothing to do with him.


classic rooster taking credit for the rising of the sun.


nuxvomica

(12,429 posts)
4. And Carter gets no credit for his economic sanctions
Wed Aug 31, 2022, 11:09 AM
Aug 2022

Including the much-criticized grain embargo. None other than Richard Nixon stated in an interview that the USSR economy was fatally destroyed by 1980 but didn't elaborate on why. I think it was Afghanistan, mostly, but also Carter, and Reagan not-so-much.

moondust

(19,993 posts)
6. +1000
Wed Aug 31, 2022, 11:46 AM
Aug 2022

The centralized/totalitarian Soviet "command economy" didn't work too well to benefit the people and would have very likely failed without either Raygun or Gorby.

I believe a big factor in its collapse was the increasing spread of information in the 70s and 80s. It was difficult or impossible for Soviet citizens to travel to the West so they didn't really know what life was like there. Then they started to learn from radio (RFE), television, magazines, newspapers, and travelers to the USSR smuggling in Levis and "stuff" that people in the West had all kinds of consumer goods, freedom to travel, etc., that they didn't have. Why not us? The first republics to exit were those in eastern Europe that found out first what they were missing out on.

An autocrat like Stalin or Putin might have been able to stem the tide of Soviet collapse for a while but it was inevitable--with or without Raygun and Gorby.

unblock

(52,253 posts)
8. Many factors behind the scenes, yeah information and appeal of western culture among them
Wed Aug 31, 2022, 02:36 PM
Aug 2022

Young people more interested in blue jeans and rock 'n' roll than communist ideology. Captains of industry liking the idea of keeping all that profit. Domestic issues in Russia becoming more important than holding on to problematic satellite states. Afghanistan. Strained budget. Infighting. Incompetence. They couldn't plan and deliver the way china could. And they couldn't find a way to do capitalism halfway, as china does.

With Gorbachev, it's an interesting question, what would have happened had he not tried to "reform" the ussr. Had he taken a hard line, yes, I think it would have collapsed anyway, but it would have been much uglier.

With Reagan, no. It's not an interesting question. at all. He was a spectator.

Kaleva

(36,309 posts)
9. People who watch MSM do so because they like it
Wed Aug 31, 2022, 02:39 PM
Aug 2022

One of the reasons the 95% of adults who don't watch cable news is because they don't like it.

UTUSN

(70,708 posts)
10. The good/bad news: Younger gens don't even know who RAYGUN was, just know the clips
Wed Aug 31, 2022, 02:42 PM
Aug 2022

The clips plus panderers of *both* parties calling him "great." Woe is us who lived under him.






Boomerproud

(7,955 posts)
11. My memory is just fine regarding St.Ronnie.
Wed Aug 31, 2022, 03:23 PM
Aug 2022

The younger folks don't know the real story and how we're still living with the consequences of his regime. Makes me angry and the MSM is forever On Bended Knee.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If I have to see "Tear Do...