General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHaggard Celine
(16,856 posts)Biophilic
(3,694 posts)How does that make any sense at all. The schools named after him.
questionseverything
(9,660 posts)Biophilic
(3,694 posts)COL Mustard
(5,925 posts)Thats the problem!!!
Rural_Progressive
(1,107 posts)Srkdqltr
(6,322 posts)gratuitous
(82,849 posts)"Yes class, you're getting Monday off, but we can't tell you why."
Irish_Dem
(47,423 posts)Biophilic
(3,694 posts)Irish_Dem
(47,423 posts)Right out of the GOP/KGB handbook.
Response to Irish_Dem (Reply #6)
Post removed
Elessar Zappa
(14,063 posts)Whos behind the book bannings again? Hint: its not the left.
underpants
(182,883 posts)JCMach1
(27,574 posts)Rite up.
It's freaking infuriating.
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,430 posts)TomSlick
(11,109 posts)The story is whether the book is "age appropriate" for required reading.
[link:https://www.dallasnews.com/news/education/2022/08/23/will-southlake-approve-using-book-by-grandson-of-slave-in-school-bearing-his-name/|
It may be a matter semantics. Either way, it doesn't look good.
keithbvadu2
(36,917 posts)Wonder if they consider the Bible "age appropriate" with its incest, murder, and more.
calimary
(81,500 posts)And those pushing it can own the first syllable, cuz it describes them perfectly.
Rhiannon12866
(206,057 posts)ck4829
(35,091 posts)bahboo
(16,358 posts)fuck this shit...give all the kids a copy, have them take it to school, and see what happens...
SharonAnn
(13,778 posts)I didn't always understand all the nuances but I really enjoyed them. They had substance.
JI7
(89,271 posts)intheflow
(28,504 posts)It's been removed from required reading, but as far as I can see from the OP article, excerpts can still be taught (as they have in the past) and its not being removed from the school library. From another article, the age-inappropriateness content at issue is probably an account of a lynching early in the book. And, there actually are books (or parts of books) that are not appropriate for 7th graders in a public classroom situation. 7th grade in particular is prickly because at least a third of the kids are still emotionally immature for their ages.
Before you all jump on me, I'm not saying I agree with this decision. I read Helter Skelter in 6th grade, so I'm sure the majority of 7th graders in this Texas town could handle one horrific scene in an otherwise inspirational book. But this didn't come about in response to a parental request, or any MAGA assholes, it was reviewed by a panel of "teachers, principals and curriculum coordinators" as part of a regular review of teaching materials.
But okay, let's be true progressives and shit on public educators because - obviously, if they live in Texas, they must all be criminally insane and incompetent.