General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDOJ asks FL judge to keep Mar a Lago affidavit under seal ... national security implications
Carrie Johnson (@johnson_carrie) - NPR:
Just in: The Justice Department asks a judge in Florida to keep the Mar a Lago affidavit under seal, cites need to "protect the integrity of an ongoing law enforcement investigation that implicates national security."
More from DOJ - "the redactions necessary to mitigate harms to the integrity of the investigation would be so extensive as to render the remaining unsealed text devoid of meaningful content, and the release of such a redacted version would not serve any public interest."
3:33 PM · Aug 15, 2022
Link to tweet
Walleye
(31,062 posts)marble falls
(57,260 posts)obamanut2012
(26,142 posts)marble falls
(57,260 posts)... this order being made public would not be a good thing before he can be elected again.
He's crazy and a dumbshit.
Captain Zero
(6,824 posts)nt
marble falls
(57,260 posts)Gore1FL
(21,152 posts)But he will keep calling for it to be released because he knows it won't be and he'll have something to target the DOJ for for fundraising.
marble falls
(57,260 posts)Ohio Joe
(21,761 posts)MarineCombatEngineer
(12,449 posts)who may have tipped off the FBI.
This will piss off the MAGAt's, in and out of Congress, but fuck em, they don't have a need to know that info.
LudwigPastorius
(9,178 posts)the CIA placed an agent in his SS protection detail because Trump is a security risk.
and that, that is the inside tipster.
MarineCombatEngineer
(12,449 posts)Hermit-The-Prog
(33,447 posts)I'm not saying that; many people are saying it. The best people are saying that.
lindysalsagal
(20,733 posts)Voltaire2
(13,194 posts)involving at least one of the TS/SCI docs.
Theyve known for months where these docs were. Theyve got TFG or his minions on surveillance doing an overt criminal act way beyond just having the documents.
IrishAfricanAmerican
(3,819 posts)onecaliberal
(32,902 posts)They were watching and waiting for that criminal act.
LeftInTX
(25,563 posts)They are citing ongoing threats to LE etc.
LiberalFighter
(51,103 posts)LeftInTX
(25,563 posts)Case 9:22-mj-08332-BER Document 59 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2022
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.617854/gov.uscourts.flsd.617854.59.0_7.pdf
The government does not object to unsealing other materials filed in connection with
the search warrant whose unsealing would not jeopardize the integrity of this national security
investigation, subject to minor redactions to protect government personnel, namely: cover
sheets associated with the search warrant application, Docket Entry (D.E.) 1; the
governments motion to seal, D.E. 2; and the Courts sealing order, D.E. 3. The
governments proposed redactions to those documents have been filed under seal as D.E. 57,
and the government now asks the Court to unseal the materials contained in that filing.
blogslug
(38,018 posts)That redacted stuff was filed under Docket 57
I could be wrong
iluvtennis
(19,876 posts)ashredux
(2,609 posts)The affidavit would divulge the information they had for the warrant.
This would help Trump start to put together a defense. And it would Hurt the potential security issues that the government will be dealing with
Bev54
(10,074 posts)Then they will get a copy for their defense.
kentuck
(111,110 posts)...he will demand that they release it and will loudly declare that they know he is innocent and that is why they will not release it.
SergeStorms
(19,204 posts)Just one more reason to rile up his flying monkeys.
"So unfair! Never in the history of the world has anyone been so persecuted! Communist Democrats are tearing the country down to get to me, because they don't want me to run in '24. So unfair!" Or something to that effect.
GreenWave
(6,766 posts)and blab it out anyway.
orangecrush
(19,624 posts)Fuck the toddlers tantrums.
And his cult.
reACTIONary
(5,786 posts)blogslug
(38,018 posts)*snip to the conclusion*
Conclusion
This Court should deny motions by third parties to the extent they seek to unseal the search warrant affidavit. Because the parties already have briefed this matter extensively, the government submits that the Court should rule on the motions without a hearing. The
government does not object to the unsealing of Docket Entry 57.
I may be wrong but I think they're going to unredact some of the redacted stuff in the Mar A Lago warrant.
LeftInTX
(25,563 posts)However, would they have a different case number the one that is already on the affidavit? mj-08332-BER
bluestarone
(17,058 posts)Maybe the judge or DOJ. should ask them to show one time any judge allowed this? These SOB's are FN crazy!
live love laugh
(13,140 posts)orangecrush
(19,624 posts)Orrex
(63,225 posts)Pretty much guarantees that some MAGA kkkultist would kill that person, with Trump's oh-so-subtle encouragement.
jaxexpat
(6,852 posts)lindysalsagal
(20,733 posts)And exhibit #1 in his collusion charge.