Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brewens

(15,032 posts)
Wed Apr 6, 2022, 07:54 AM Apr 2022

So, I looked to see just what they claim is on the copy of the hard drive they say was

from Hunter Biden's laptop. I was wondering what changed since we heard this story a couple years ago when the NY Post put it out.

Evidently the Washington Post authenticated emails on the copy of the HD they received. I don't remember doubting they had real copies of his emails, or that he had dealings in China that might be shady. It was the whole laptop story that stunk to high heaven. They aren't telling us the truth about how they got that.

One thing is Hunter and his uncle controlled entities that were paid a few million by a Chinese energy company. I suppose they'd like everyone to think Hunter and his uncle divvied all that up, but it doesn't even mean they made any money for sure. They probably did, but I don't see where they say what the entities did. It could be legit, and Hunter and his uncle might have made a reasonable profit.

That's just what I got from watching what FOX "News" and a couple other right-wing sources have told their viewers. So what? Hunter isn't in the administration and I doubt democrats will follow the republican playbook and run Hunter as our presidential nominee in a few years, like they did with George H.W. Bushes boy. He had a fake job with Harken Energy if you remember.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So, I looked to see just what they claim is on the copy of the hard drive they say was (Original Post) brewens Apr 2022 OP
Today snowybirdie Apr 2022 #1
For all their new-found political "woke-ness," Morning Joe easily slides back into politics as usual Raster Apr 2022 #2
The whole thing is a laughable fabrication. lagomorph777 Apr 2022 #3
With the trump children literally making 200x what Hunter Biden did it is a nothingburger. SoonerPride Apr 2022 #4
Joe Biden was not VP or a candidate for Pres at time of the alleged payments (that weren't illegal) wishstar Apr 2022 #5

snowybirdie

(5,476 posts)
1. Today
Wed Apr 6, 2022, 08:03 AM
Apr 2022

Morning Joe resurrected Dan Abrams to tell us all, breathlessly, the old story of the laptop. Both Dan and his story have seen better days.

Raster

(20,999 posts)
2. For all their new-found political "woke-ness," Morning Joe easily slides back into politics as usual
Wed Apr 6, 2022, 09:45 AM
Apr 2022

... he can't help himself. It's the RETHUGLICAN in him. Listen long enough, and he'll sing you another chorus of the "Bad Bill Clinton Blues," and wistfully long for Raygun*s City on a Hill.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
3. The whole thing is a laughable fabrication.
Wed Apr 6, 2022, 10:11 AM
Apr 2022

Including the faux reports of "authentication" by some third party.

SoonerPride

(12,286 posts)
4. With the trump children literally making 200x what Hunter Biden did it is a nothingburger.
Wed Apr 6, 2022, 10:34 AM
Apr 2022

Nepotism and parlaying your daddy's name for financial gain is nothing new and not a crime.

wishstar

(5,475 posts)
5. Joe Biden was not VP or a candidate for Pres at time of the alleged payments (that weren't illegal)
Wed Apr 6, 2022, 10:47 AM
Apr 2022

and my reading of articles of the investigation indicate that the only question is exactly how much if any of the payments were taxable income and whether he claimed correct amount on his taxes which is complicated by issue of investment company entities involved

We already knew this before the 2020 election as Hunter issued a statement about having relied on his tax attorneys to determine correct filing and that he was fully cooperating with tax investigation.

The other issue regarding whether he should have filed as foreign agent seems a stretch as Hunter wasn't involved in politics or public relations in the way that Manafort and Flynn have been and Joe was not in office or a candidate during time of the payments

.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So, I looked to see just ...