General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIf Finland were invaded tomorrow
and they are not NATO, would we show up and defend them, if they were begging for help?
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
uponit7771
(90,668 posts)Eyeball_Kid
(7,520 posts)uponit7771
(90,668 posts)... this fact what he will or wont do is off the table
EndlessWire
(7,003 posts)And the Bug River is in Poland. And that means...
EndlessWire
(7,003 posts)Eyeball_Kid
(7,520 posts)Finland has close ties to other Scandinavian countries. Sweden and Norway would insist.
maxsolomon
(33,945 posts)Norway is.
Rusher is not going to invade Finland.
radius777
(3,759 posts)so legally NATO would not protect them - but likely the major Western nations would.
This crisis is a wakeup call for all of the NATO critics. Russia is an existential threat to the West and only understands force as a deterrant.
EndlessWire
(7,003 posts)radius777
(3,759 posts)Europe (especially Germany) appeased (and forced us to in the process) Russia. Ukraine and Georgia should've been in NATO a long time ago. Russia/Putin's oil corrupted Europe.
Buddy2
(28 posts)Knowing that question, what is the price to pay(WW3) for defending a prize that is not a prize?
Would you fight WW3 over Fiji?
Depends.