General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJohnSJ
(92,422 posts)Hugin
(33,208 posts)I know you're correct, but, why?
JohnSJ
(92,422 posts)one of the major world powers after WWII who were on the winning side
Hugin
(33,208 posts)Which, ironically, included at the time Ukraine and several of the now NATO member nations.
So, how come only Russia retains the veto?
I know, you don't have any answer to that either. I'm thinking out loud.
tritsofme
(17,403 posts)Hugin
(33,208 posts)Interesting. Thanks for the lesson.
I suppose it was due to Russia being in the nuke club.
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)former9thward
(32,082 posts)SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)former9thward
(32,082 posts)Only the SC can approve changes and those would be vetoed.
C_U_L8R
(45,021 posts)They can stuff their veto.
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)at140
(6,110 posts)Russia will just veto such resolution and will be joined by China.
The UN charter is such, they can not expel the veto powered members, is how I understand it.
C_U_L8R
(45,021 posts)blogslug
(38,018 posts)Amishman
(5,559 posts)Only the security council has any power, and anything involving a major power is pointless as well because of the veto