General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOprah Winfrey is as much a fraud as the ones she brought into the spotlight.
We're talking Joel Osteen, James Frey, Dr. Phil, Dr. Oz, Suze Orman, etc. and the rest of her "magical thinking" bullshit.
Personally, I was never a fan. Much like Trump, I've always felt that she was foisted upon us.
Afternoon talk shows were great until she hit the scene. I adored Phil Donahue. His show was always intelligent and thought provoking. Then comes Oprah with her fluff crap and the genre went down hill from there.
BFD, she gives away cars. Does she cover the costs for the insurance?
Her response to Dr. Oz's Senate run is "Let Pennsylvania decide".
F*** her and the horse she rode in on.
Wounded Bear
(58,670 posts)leftstreet
(36,109 posts)DURec for the OP
LymphocyteLover
(5,644 posts)PatrickforB
(14,578 posts)This post got folks all excited.
Autumn
(45,109 posts)I can't recommend this enough.
Rebl2
(13,528 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)Seems like a big broad brush hate fest going on here.
Doc Sportello
(7,522 posts)Reread the post (it includes names) and Google them. Yeah, they are frauds and it is totally appropriate Oprah for giving them the platforms they now hold.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)and with the exception of Dr. OZ, and perhaps Joel Osteen, who may have simply been a guest on her show, I'm not seeing the " fraud". Even if some others ARE frauds,what makes people think she couldn't have been fooled herself?
Sorry, I don't hate Oprah.
Doc Sportello
(7,522 posts)The whole "hate" theme is being spun out there as a deflection from her responsibility in giving a huge platform to people who are not only frauds but are giving out dangerous misinformation. One now wants to go to the Senate (giving us another RW fruitcake there if he wins) and all she can say is "Let the people decide". Celebrities who use their power in this way should be accountable. Minimizing her responsibility as you do makes things worse.
Sorry, I don't worship Oprah - or any celebrity.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)You might want to check the thread again.
Doc Sportello
(7,522 posts)I'm old.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)No problem.
Response to whathehell (Reply #132)
Doc Sportello This message was self-deleted by its author.
Doc Sportello
(7,522 posts)I guess I could have added a hate Oprah or not. Didn't think it would be that hard to understand. Yes you don't hate Oprah and yes I got the right poster. I don't hate Oprah and doubt if any of the others do either. Just a deflection on your part, I guess to avoid facing the facts.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)Lol..I have NO idea of what "facts" you.imagine me to be avoiding, no idea why you posted me. Maybe you should just take a deep breath and chill or something.
Doc Sportello
(7,522 posts)Told you where to find the names and info. Maybe you just need to face reality - or something. I'm fine. In fact your dancing around has been quite amusing. But those LOLs realllly got me.
Autumn
(45,109 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)no REASONS to label people like Suze Orman or Dr. Phil as "frauds". I'm familiar with these last two and see no " fraud" there.
Autumn
(45,109 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts).
Why are Dr. Phil and Suze Orman "frauds", and if they are, how do you know, as the OP so strongly suggests, that Oprah knew that in advance?
Autumn
(45,109 posts)I told you I consider them frauds and BS artists. You have questions about the OP ask them. And yes I do not like Oprah either.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)we're supposed to be able to back them up..You obviously can't. Next.
Autumn
(45,109 posts)like Oprah or her frauds. Don't forget to go after the 92 who recommended the OP
BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)Hassin Bin Sober
(26,330 posts)SylviaD
(721 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)Learn the difference.
BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)Amazing anyone thinks Dr Phil is legitimate.
Autumn
(45,109 posts)But he's not a fraud!!!
TexasBushwhacker
(20,204 posts)Sure, he still has his PhD, and technically he can still practice "therapy" in California, but not in Texas where he was originally licensed.
I find him hawking weight loss products rather ludicrous, since at 6'4" and 240 lbs, his BMI is "overweight" bordering on obese. He says BMI charts are inaccurate. Okay, so let's go by the waist measurements that doctors recommend. For men, their waist should be no greater than 40", or if you go by Dr. Oz's method, one"s waist should be no greater than 1/2 of one's height. For Dr. Phil, that would be 38". Now I've heard he's a very competitive tennis player, and he may be very fit in that regard. But he has a double chin and most definitely has a waist greater than 40", so I'll take my weight loss advice from someone else, thanks.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)even if not in Texas,, but as to his being fat and "hawking" weight loss products, that seems a very minor offense to me, hardly an indication of "fraud"..Who on television isn't selling something?
And again, what's it got to do with Oprah?
Totally Tunsie
(10,885 posts)If you pay attention to the credits on his program, you will see a disclaimer stating that his show is "for entertainment purposes only". He is no longer a licensed practitioner.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)He's not breaking any laws. Who cares?
Don't we have worthless adversaries than this?
Totally Tunsie
(10,885 posts)and hasn't been since 2006.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)still able to practice therapy, except in Texas. That said, my big question, which none have yet answered, is why is this Oprah's fault?
Totally Tunsie
(10,885 posts)even if not in Texas,,
so you did, in print, say he "IS still eligible."
Regarding Oprah:
SHE was the one to unleash $hill on the public, first by hawking him as an expert and having him as a frequent guest on her show, then by actively promoting and backing $hill in his own show. Had it not been for Oprah, he'd still be teaching potential witnesses how to fudge the truth on the witness stand. Oprah created the $hill we see today.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)That means I am QUOTING someone else..Comprende?
As to your grudge against Oprah for introducing him, she did that YEARS ago!..Even if he IS a fraud now, who says he showed signs of it then? Blaming Oprah for him is just scapegoat bullshit, imo
As I asked before,, do we not have more serious issues to deal with than Oprah and Dr. Phil? Just a thought.
DenaliDemocrat
(1,476 posts)Studies show that if it is going to work, it will show significant improvement in 10 sessions. If you dont see major improvements 10 sessions, you probably wont.
Most people I know in therapy really arent there to make changes - they want validation. Probably why it doesnt work too often
whathehell
(29,067 posts)because, frankly, I'd guess it's "'some' studies'" at best
DenaliDemocrat
(1,476 posts)It also doesnt work much for PTSD or depression. Its not terribly effective.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)This is a topic I'm interested in.
Mossfern
(2,513 posts)but my therapy of more than 7 years is certainly not 'validation'. It's intense and painful. Maybe you've seen the wrong therapist.
Also, I have seen changes in my understanding of issues. I won't go any further because I can assume that talk therapy didn't work for you and you're angry about that.
PatSeg
(47,517 posts)but Dr. Phil has a reputation for being a charlatan.
- While allegations of the abuse of guests on his show are one thing, what about the women that accused him of sexual assault?
On the surface, Phil McGraw looks like the answer to an addicts prayers. Countless families have turned to his show for help, from moms that cant handle teen tearaways to famous people holding on by a thread.
Whether youre Danielle Bregoli or Dina Lohan, the doc claims to have the magic touch. However, all he really has is a big budget and a knack for bringing out the worst in people for compelling TV.
https://www.ccn.com/dr-phil-charlatan-tv-shrink-shady-history-sexual-assault/
Meanwhile, he hasn't had a therapist's license since 2006. He is just another television personality who will do anything for ratings. I'm surprised he hasn't run for political office.
If you Google "Dr. Phil is a fraud", there are tons of articles pop up.
whopis01
(3,514 posts)She put out a debit card (the Approved Card from Suze Orman) with claims about it being a tool to help build your credit. The marketing was clearly designed to confuse people into thinking that it operated like a secured credit card when it was nothing of the sort.
For example, the marketing included statements from Suze Orman such as I am proud to say that the Approved card is the first prepaid card in history to share information with TransUnion, a major credit bureau.
While that was technically true, the information shared was not used for credit reporting purposes and had no impact on anyones credit score.
She then spun it as an experiment to see if activity on a debit card can create a FICO score. Guess what? It doesnt.
Meanwhile fees were collected for virtually anything done with the card. Checking your balance, calling customer service, not using direct deposit to put more money on the card, etc. all generated fees.
That isnt an unusual thing for such cards - but she would rail against such things on her show. She tells people to avoid these types of nickel and dime fees. She even berated other celebrities who put out similar products (the Kardashian Kard) and then turns around and offers the same thing with some false suggestions about it being helpful to building credit.
So, she qualifies as a fraud in my book.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)in my book, you can't necessarily make Oprah responsible..Being Rich doesn't make people psychic, or all- knowing.
whopis01
(3,514 posts)Just to clarify.
I really have no opinion about her one way or the other.
Response to whopis01 (Reply #277)
whathehell This message was self-deleted by its author.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)"Oprah is as much a fraud as those she put in the spotlight".
That is the subject line of the OP...Didn't you read it?
whopis01
(3,514 posts)All I was doing was letting you know that I agreed with you and what I had to say about Suze Orman had nothing to do with Oprah in my opinion.
When you responded saying you can't necessarily make Oprah responsible I merely clarified I was not attempting to link Oprah to Suze Ormans fraud in any way.
whathehell
(29,067 posts).Sorry for the miscommunication, but you seemed to misunderstand why I mentioned Oprah.
OneBro
(1,159 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)..anyone can put anything on the web and, regardless of source, some will believe it.
Having no idea who "bb.com" might be, I'll reserve judgement.
BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)Who all have one thing in common. Eek.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)believing accusations based on the flimsiest and least credible 'evidence'
BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)Plenty of evidence. Do your research.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)able to provide!,
"Do your research"?
Honey, I don't think you even know HOW to research.
BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)resorting to personal accusations?
BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)I do hope your New Years Eve improves.
whathehell
(29,067 posts):
Clearly, the answer is " yes".
BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)Hang in there hon.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)Back at ya, dear.
BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)You do realize youre bumping this thread again and again? The thread you seem to have a problem with?
whathehell
(29,067 posts)I do know the "getting the last word" one though.
BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)I have to console my dogs as the evenings fireworks continue, so you can have the last word. Which of course will bump the thread again, lol. This was easy
.very easy. Thanks!
Thank you again for bumping this thread though because I dont have to kick it now.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)olegramps
(8,200 posts)I will not name the product for obvious reasons, i.e. suits. The Utah BBB arranged total refund and had received many complaints about products he pushed on TV. I would suggest any product advertised on the show be checked out before purchase. Dr. Oz has a very disturbing history dating from his right to practice at specific hospital being voided due to investigation by peers. He has numerous complaints about products that he has shilled for. His endorsement of the fraudulent claims regarding Trump's medical exam is a prime example.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)but we can't assume that, years ago, Oprah foisted him on the public, knowing he was going to do dodgy things.
cab67
(2,993 posts)my wife is a clinical psychologist. She most decidedly does NOT like being compared with Dr Phil in any way.
I realize this particular vlogger isn't everyone's cup of tea, but these videos still do an excellent job of explaining the situation:
I don't know much about Orman - just not interested enough.
progressoid
(49,992 posts)And a whole lot more:
She may be the most powerful crank enabler on the planet.
https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2018/1/9/16868216/oprah-winfrey-pseudoscience
https://slate.com/health-and-science/2018/01/oprah-winfrey-helped-create-our-irrational-pseudoscientific-american-fantasyland.html
The_REAL_Ecumenist
(723 posts)a 3 dollar bill. As a black woman, I found her to be demeaning. condescending & insulting, especially in light of her harrangaunging formerly &/or presently addicted &/or troubled guests. I DETEST hypocrites and she's always epitomised the highest level of gotdamn hypocrites.
Scrivener7
(50,956 posts)childfreebychoice
(476 posts)Scrivener7
(50,956 posts)hlthe2b
(102,299 posts)ecstatic
(32,712 posts)Calling her a "heifer" on DU of all places? Sorry, that doesn't fly with me.
The_REAL_Ecumenist
(723 posts)She's despicable and frankly, I've been done with her behind for DECADES! Oh, welcome to DU, right glad tameetcha!
hlthe2b
(102,299 posts)Last edited Thu Dec 30, 2021, 06:14 AM - Edit history (1)
or not. No matter how you feel about Winfrey or any other person, gender-based slurs don't just show intense disrespect for her, but women in general--of all races.
CrackityJones75
(2,403 posts)The_REAL_Ecumenist
(723 posts)because it's NOT sexist. It's a word that is used to describe what she is.
CrackityJones75
(2,403 posts)It isnt sexist????? Ok ok ok set aside that it being sexist is only one possible problem here. And You dont understand African Culture???? GTFOH with that bullshit. It doesnt have anything to do with your African Culture.
I may not care for Oprah one bit but you arent going to sit here and claim your African Culture when you post some bullshit. The same way I am not going to post some bullshit and the explain it away by saying you dont understand my culture.
Your post is ridiculously offensive and outright fucking stupid. No matter what fucking culture we are talking about.
The_REAL_Ecumenist
(723 posts)what thefuck you're talking about. and guess what else? What you're not going to do is to tell me what I KNOW about my subculture. I'm NOT going to explain what I hae lived for almost 58 years. I've been a member of DUfor 16 years and I have NO duty to justify my world to you. Bye, child, bye!
CrackityJones75
(2,403 posts)The fuck does that have to do with anything?
When prople say some bullshit we should just excuse it because Their culture? Will remember that the next time the dumb fucking rednecks dowm the block start spouting THEIR culture.
Please your lame excuse is a joke.
Done with you.
CrackityJones75
(2,403 posts)I grew up in a very diverse area. The whole I am black and you have to accept what I say because of it bullshit doesnt fly with me. If thats Your culture Your culture is wrong.
ecstatic
(32,712 posts)Referring to other black women as heifers is NOT a black thing, it's some self-hating bullshit. I get that there are some amongst us who have internalized the cruelty, disrespect, racism and sexism that is lobbed at us day in and out, but it's not normal or healthy. Just say you don't like Oprah and leave it at that.
Just my opinion, obviously.
Response to ecstatic (Reply #190)
Post removed
hlthe2b
(102,299 posts)(and damned sad that should have to say it)...
I also tend to believe that that person is not who they pretend to be.
Imo, of course.
Moebym
(989 posts)Then I guess the use of any term is defensible if we claim it's a part of our culture that others will never understand or appreciate.
At this point, it's not even about our opinions on Oprah or the term "heifer". I'm talking about using the "you're not one of us" defense to justify accepted behavior or beliefs within your culture.
As an example, the Mayor-Elect of NYC recently faced criticism for telling the NYC Council they could only question his position on solitary confinement when they've served 22 years in law enforcement like he had. As far as he's concerned, the matter of incarceration is strictly a law enforcement matter that outsiders should keep their noses out of.
I could find countless other examples.
Tl;dr people who aren't a part of your culture or in-group have the right to criticize it.
ecstatic
(32,712 posts)OneBro
(1,159 posts)You said it better than I would have, and captured exactly what I was thinking and feeling.
betsuni
(25,546 posts)Blue_Adept
(6,399 posts)But it just furthers that DU has gotten worse and worse over the years through "self-policing" and what's considered acceptable.
Just an ugly and disgusting post regardless of how the poster tries to justify it. It clearly reminds me that this place is not for me any longer and it's just habit that brings me back since being here for two decades.
Tommymac
(7,263 posts)It is what it is, always has been and always will be.
It is the nature of the system. Love it or hate it. Me, I am kinda neutral - it is way better then other systems I have seen over the last 30 years, and worse then some others.
To me it is part of the 'charm' of DU. I don't take offense when something I voted to ban is not, or the other way around. In fact, I enjoy serving on juries.
Dorian Gray
(13,496 posts)is a problem, of course.
The worst of the bunch, and most damaging societally, is not even Osteen (huckster) or Phil (whatever), or even Oz (I think he's in over his head and will lose).
The worst of the bunch is Dr. Christiane Northrup. Anti-vaccine doctor who Oprah introduced to us, gave a platform to, and she was Oprha's audience's favorite gynocologial expert.
She parlayed that into very alternative therapies, and no anti-vaccine monetization.
She's one of the disinformation dozen.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christiane_Northrup
bermudat
(1,329 posts)He won't win but he'll make megabucks along the way.
msongs
(67,420 posts)Sympthsical
(9,076 posts)I think she should be a social pariah. She made her billion and did irreparable harm to society with the things she unleashed.
That's all I'll say. I could literally write a book about my loathing of her.
japple
(9,833 posts)be selling many copies.
wryter2000
(46,051 posts)I write romance novels.
SergeStorms
(19,204 posts)you had a romance with Oprah. Then you'd sell billions of books.
Get right on that, OK?
wryter2000
(46,051 posts)It would have to be depressing.
greatauntoftriplets
(175,743 posts)I've watched her show exactly once in my life, and was a captive audience at the time.
targetpractice
(4,919 posts)... She proudly claimed she never read the books by authors appearing on her show for interviews. Said she thought that was more relatable to the audience.
How that evolved into a having "book club"... I don't understand.
ret5hd
(20,501 posts)were more "wine clubs where we carry around books we mighta read a few chapters".
Maybe I'm wrong.
targetpractice
(4,919 posts)... which guarantees a top selling title. Publishers fight and lobby Oprah for her endorsements.
There may be wine involved during the lobbying process. I don't know.
hlthe2b
(102,299 posts)Her show was a business in the end and she promoted some very unsavory people as is quite apparent today. But, I generally liked her, though I was never a frequent viewer.
KS Toronado
(17,270 posts)Remember reading when everybody wanted us to invade Iraq, Phil was the lone TV personality questioning the logic
of invading Iraq when the 9-11 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia. Shortly after that programs airing he was kicked
off the airwaves. Some of the early cancel culture by Rs. My dad (WWII vet) reminded me at the time that Fascists
always go after journalists that expose them.
Jetheels
(991 posts)OneCrazyDiamond
(2,032 posts)He said it straight out on democracy now. In that interview they cited an internal memo to the same.
Lancero
(3,004 posts)That Oprah propped up.
hlthe2b
(102,299 posts)Dr. Oz likewise propped up Trump, who literally has enabled COVID deaths at a rate that dwarfs those lost on 911 and our war dead in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. So, NO. Not even close. Bush* was the result of overwhelming corruption of the election in FL and an enabling RW majority on the SCOTUS. Even with Nader in the race, it should not have come to that and clearly, Donohue could never have seen that-- never intended for that. A big difference with the 2016 situation that ultimately gave us Trump. But, I know you are not going to be persuaded. Not to mention the entire reason MSNBC ditched Donohue was that he was too vocal and too effective in calling out the Bush* administration and their contrived reasons for the Iraqi War.
Green Line
(1,123 posts)brush
(53,794 posts)If she beat out Donahue in the ratings, what did he do to combat it? Stuff happens.
tenderfoot
(8,437 posts)Trashy schlock for the simple-minded does well with ratings. Ask Geraldo.
brush
(53,794 posts)Response to brush (Reply #20)
Post removed
brush
(53,794 posts)I didn't watch Oprah. I do admire her for being smart enough to navigate around the racism in this country to become a self-made, Black woman billionaire. Something many seem to be envious of.
But stuff happens. Come on, let it go. It's decades later.
Doc Sportello
(7,522 posts)And the damage they've done and continue to do lives on, not something decades ago. And if she were white, would you feel the same way about her?
brush
(53,794 posts)She also donated millions to other charities. Mention those too. If she were white, she would've had a much easier time at it, right? So there's that.
Doc Sportello
(7,522 posts)I understand why some don't want to hear about her responsibilities in this area. Doesn't change the facts. And you trying to avoid answering my question with a question won't work either. I guess you just don't think some people should be held responsible for their actions because of who they are.
brush
(53,794 posts)in their life.
BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)Be prepared for an unpleasant surprise.
brush
(53,794 posts)BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)Its really not difficult.
Lancero
(3,004 posts)Damage he did lives on, not something decades ago.
Phil Donahue is hardly the paragon of virtue that people here believe him to be, and the man he pushed up did far worse damage to our nation than all the people Oprah supported combined.
Doc Sportello
(7,522 posts)Phil Donahue was not the deciding factor in the election. And I never said anything about him, much less that he's a paragon of virtue. What a pitiful attempt at a false equivalency. This whole thread shows just how destructive hero worship is. You can't criticize RWers for doing it if you're doing it too.
brush
(53,794 posts)wryter2000
(46,051 posts)And the show was never the same. I don't know why. Maybe a change in the staff?
tishaLA
(14,176 posts)Mr Donahue generally did a fine program, but he was as interested in doing things to get ratings as Ms Winfrey (and he admits it)
SharonAnn
(13,777 posts)They cancelled his show.
tishaLA
(14,176 posts)And says nothing about the demonstrable proof I posted that he dumbed down his show for ratings and admitted as much.
dflprincess
(28,079 posts)Doesn't say much for the viewers.
Jimbo S
(2,958 posts)Wore a skirt to try to match Oprah's shock value.
tenderfoot
(8,437 posts)that didn't like that women wore pants.
dflprincess
(28,079 posts)It had nothing to do with Oprah. But was considered one of his more controversial shows.
https://www.encyclopedia.com/media/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/donahue-phil-1935
walkingman
(7,630 posts)on old people and those that have always followed the "National Enquirer". These last few years has really exposed how ignorant we are as a nation. I just don't remember this until the last decade or so?? I am starting to believe it really is "social media". Before I just thought it was the religious nuts but now not so sure.
Shermann
(7,423 posts)I've watched a few minutes of her show; some the advice was dubious but probably harmless.
Ford_Prefect
(7,905 posts)The way it was put was that what she advises only works for a certain income level with certain kinds of costs. It won't help most of the people who've seen her on PBS or at her seminars, or at least it won't help them much.
Rabrrrrrr
(58,349 posts)But otherwise, she's not much more than any of the other "get rich quick" bozo fucks.
Shermann
(7,423 posts)Mostly she seems to be all about living below your means and making conservative investments, the opposite of get rich quick really.
Ford_Prefect
(7,905 posts)pay off in the real world. Her out is you must be conservative to a degree only a few can afford. Most people can't to use her methods and still pay real world bills. It looks like it makes sense because she is telling you the system works if you are conservative with your spending. She never acknowledges that the system is built on individuals going into massive debt to afford life as we know it. She never addressed that aspect nor the predatory nature of the market.
Celerity
(43,422 posts)14 Reasons to Not Listen to Suze Orman
https://www.goodfinancialcents.com/suze-orman-bad-advice/
6 Reasons I Will Never Trust Suze Orman
https://www.moneytalksnews.com/6-reasons-im-no-fan-of-suze-orman-and-you-shouldnt-be-either/
4 Things Suze Orman Is Dead Wrong About
https://www.fool.com/the-ascent/personal-finance/articles/4-things-suze-orman-is-dead-wrong-about/
How Suze Orman SCAMMED the Poor and Middle Class
BeckyDem
(8,361 posts)When she declined I had to wonder if it was related in part to what you have written, she is not stupid. Why run for office only to have all of this brought to the surface? For whatever reason, I was grateful she did not decide to run.
Oprah Winfrey for president: More and more celebrities back superstar
By Katie Scott Global News
Posted January 15, 2018 3:31 pm
Many celebrities are calling for the former talk show host to run for U.S. president in 2020. Those supporters include Steven Spielberg, Reverend Jesse Louis Jackson Sr., Sarah Silverman and Meryl Streep.
https://globalnews.ca/news/3965549/oprah-winfrey-for-president/
tenderfoot
(8,437 posts)In fact there was an OP here on DU suggesting it.
BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)And I remember who posted it.
And those who were on board lol.
Texasgal
(17,045 posts)Never want to miss that opportunity to bash or complain about another DU'er... Or Du in general.
BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)Very good memory. Photographic, in fact.
A blessing and a curse.
oregonjen
(3,338 posts)Friends I know believe in the spiritual woo that her guests have peddled. So much so, that they believe their spiritual auras will protect them from Covid. They feel they dont need to get vaccinated. Smart thinking Democratic people have been brainwashed and it boggles my mind.
targetpractice
(4,919 posts)... It was a book she claimed changed her life. The gist of the book was basically, "Visualize what you want, and keep doing that." Sorry if I spoiled it for you.
Xolodno
(6,395 posts)Visualize what you want, then work backwards on the tasks that need to be accomplished...or something like that. Saw it on a Simpsons episode.
Reminds me of the time they got our entire department to a rented hall at the Hilton. It was supposed to be some sort of morale building, get you to work harder, etc. jig. I kid you not, this was the opening video:
"At 211 degrees you have water, but at 212 you have boiling water, which turns into steam and with steam you can power a locomotive! ...That one extra degree can accomplish so much!
I managed not to laugh and keep a straight face at all the new execs (from other companies) give their speeches about "that one extra degree". Then relished in the free catered lunch.
targetpractice
(4,919 posts)... In team building exercises like that... At some point I would stop listening, and start counting heads to estimate the minimum cost in labor for the exercise.
Yeah, Oprah's thing was "The Secret"... Maybe "The Answer" was a parody version on The Simpsons.
soldierant
(6,890 posts)But I guess that's not such a rare occurrence on The Simpsons.
cynical_idealist
(360 posts)Every couple years at work we have a new fad about the greatest ideas for
increasing productivity. Some people get enthusiastic for a few weeks...
Solomon
(12,311 posts)them. It's not "woo" to them. The thing I find hilarious about it is that it's not a "secret" at all. Countless successful people have told us the same thing for eons.
targetpractice
(4,919 posts)It's not a secret at all.
Talitha
(6,593 posts)Kids and life got in the way though, so I stopped watching. I have no idea how or when she turned into a 'guru' to her drooling masses - but wow, what a change. They need to stop the adoration, and she really needs to get over herself.
targetpractice
(4,919 posts)... The pulled a little red wagon onto the set that was filled with a pile of beef fat equivalent to her weight loss. It was on all the grocery store magazines the next week... An image-making moment for her.
Talitha
(6,593 posts)So that was her magic "Hey, I can make money off of this" moment?
Makes sense.
When she interviewed Meghan and Harry, it looked to me like she'd gained it all back, though. I'm not bashing her for it - many people have permanent weight problems.
But she made a ton (no pun intended, haha) of money by hawking all kinds of weight loss stuff, and then stopped following her own advice after the bank was full. It was like slapping her followers in the face, you know?
She may be an authentically nce person, but she'll never get any support from me.
JuJuChen
(2,215 posts)wryter2000
(46,051 posts)I remember a show about corruption in management of the high-rise low income apartment buildings. The main guest was (as I recall) a city councilman who gave the lowdown about how some maintenance workers were paid overtime for working 24 hours a day while the buildings fell apart. It was a total eye opener for folks who thought "if only they kept their places clean everything would be okay." They had some tenants on, too. It really busted up some racist stereotypes.
mopinko
(70,138 posts)she thought her job was to do maintenance so they didnt break. she was quickly disabused of that notion, and taught several card games.
iluvtennis
(19,863 posts)fame that she changed.
Cosmocat
(14,566 posts)fame can do things to people ...
Effete Snob
(8,387 posts)wryter2000
(46,051 posts)I don't feel as strongly as you do about her, but I'm not a fan. She definitely has a holier-than-thou attitude, imho. Her absolute scorn for romance novels really ticked me off. Is there something bad about a story with a happy ending? Or depiction of loving sex? Or enjoyment for enjoyment's sake?
I loved the old Donahue show. Some shows were better than others, but the good ones were really great. The details are very sketchy now because the show was so long ago, but I remember him asking a prominent scientist about the existence of a god. As I recall, the scientist's answers was "If you want to define God as that which existed before the Big Bang, I have no problem with that." As an agnostic, I found that insightful and very helpful to my own thinking.
Demovictory9
(32,457 posts)LakeArenal
(28,826 posts)Shes ultra rich. Has done a lot more than give away cars.
Shes not spouting vaccine misinformation.
She has dickish friends. So do I.
Somewhere along the way she started believing her own press.
Became theGrand Master TV star.
Ego is huge
whathehell
(29,067 posts)Sour grapes, holiday blues, envy?..Can think of lots of people more worthy.of scorn than Oprah
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Willingness to pass this kind of judgement on the life of any entertainment figure suggests to me that a person is very unqualified to be judging others.
Ron Obvious
(6,261 posts)Agreed on all counts.
NJCher
(35,688 posts)Why does the poster have to have a motive, especially one of "sour grapes"? No one can say what the poster's motive is. Maybe, just maybe, it's an OPINION, since this is an OPINION forum.
Anyway, I have this to say about Oprah: ehhh.
Or maybe: meh.
Yes, she has good communication skills. So do a lot of people.
Jimbo S
(2,958 posts)I'm biased because I was a Phil fan. Discussed the issues of the day intelligently. Oprah comes along with her shock act and garners the ratings. Phil is forced out and then Oprah goes "normal".
wryter2000
(46,051 posts)Her show originally was the beginning of the trash talk shows. Then, she turned oh-so-spiritual and full of gobbledy-gook.
lindysalsagal
(20,693 posts)Watch Don't Look Up. She's just one of them.
vanlassie
(5,677 posts)czarjak
(11,278 posts)dixiechiken1
(2,113 posts)Freakin' FINALLY, someone said it! I never understood the allure of Oprah. Never have, never will. She was always a bit too sanctimonious for me. And stupid Dr Oz running for senate? That's aaaaallllllllll on her. She can suck it, as far as I'm concerned.
You come sit by me, tenderfoot. We have much to discuss.
Jetheels
(991 posts)And loved Phil Donahue (and Marlo).
tenderfoot
(8,437 posts)Dang. We're just all jealous of her wealth.
Someday, when THEY are wealthy like Oprah...
ShazzieB
(16,428 posts)Dr. Oz = woo woo quack quack
Joel Osteen = gag me with a spoon
Most of the others I don't know much about.
But Dr. Phil does not belong on any list of "magical thinking" gurus. Whether you like him or not, that magical thinking crap is not his shtick. He's very much rooted in the real world, and in science. (That's right, I said science.)
I didn't used to have a very good opinion of him, but that changed when I actually started watching him, which I've been doing for a while now. He's really not much Iike his haters think he is, and I've learned a lot watching that show, about all kinds of things, addictions and domestic violence, in particular.
Do I always agree with him? Of course not, but I don't have to agree with everything a person says to find them worth paying attention to.
He avoids getting overtly political on his show, but he's quite willing to speak up about things like child abuse (of all kinds), domestic violence, and LGBTQ issues (any parent who wants to reject their gay or trans child will get an earful from him). He's also been outspoken about taking proper covid precautions in shooting episodes of his show, and he's never pedaled any lies about the virus, or about masks, vaccines, etc. And he has provided invaluable information about things like how to safely extricate oneself from an abusive relationship (which, BTW, can be a lot harder than most people think).
He has a very BIG personality, and I can understand why it's off-putting to some. It just annoys me to see someone get hated on for reasons that have nothing to do with who they really are or what they're actually about, or be criticized for things that they have not in fact, done.
If you don't like him, that's fine. I just recommend making sure the reasons you dont like him are rooted in reality.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)He helped create what is likely the smartest & best show on network TV, "Bull". For that, alone, I like him.
demmiblue
(36,865 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)Last edited Wed Dec 29, 2021, 08:55 PM - Edit history (2)
IS bad.. That said, how is this Oprah's fault?..She "discovered " him many years ago, as her personal therapist, I believe, and he apparently did well by her. How could she be expected to foresee the future?
Maggiemayhem
(811 posts)Evidently, some teens were abused.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)the incident you speak of, but, again, how is this Oprah's fault?
Totally Tunsie
(10,885 posts)He was, at that time, a "consultant" - not a therapist. He was working with a group named Courtroom Sciences that offered consulting to those who need to give testimony in court and who need coaching on the courtroom fundamentals. She hired him to coach her with regard to testimony she was about to give relating to the beef industry as she was being sued for defamation for commentary she had made. "Therapy" had nothing to do with their association.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)I guess the point is, she liked him, and it doesn't sound like he was a "shill" then.
Totally Tunsie
(10,885 posts)There are numerous instances in his past that are suspicious, to say the least, and he has been investigated, suspended, and placed on probation by the Board of Psychiatry for reproachful practices including inappropriate behavior with his clients.
Perhaps, if you wish to defend him, you should learn some of his history:
https://www.ccn.com/dr-phil-charlatan-tv-shrink-shady-history-sexual-assault/
whathehell
(29,067 posts)Why is this Oprah's fault?
Totally Tunsie
(10,885 posts)Autumn
(45,109 posts)and deaths from drowning. Dr of Quackery.
Cha
(297,323 posts)disclosure.. I don't watch tv.
Celerity
(43,422 posts)https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2020/on-fox-news-dr-phil-said-360000-americans-die-in-swimming-pools-every-year-hes-wrong-by-magnitudes/
snip
Our ruling
McGraw said there are 360,000 (deaths) a year from swimming pools, but we dont shut the country down for that.
For one thing, thats too many zeros. There were 3,709 U.S. deaths from accidental drowning or submersion in 2017.
McGraw has since said he was citing the worldwide number for drowning deaths, and that his comparisons were probably bad examples. The coronavirus is infectious and contagious, and the count of deaths from drowning is spread over a year.
We rate his original statement False.
https://www.edgarsnyder.com/statistics/swimming-pool-statistics.html
jimfields33
(15,835 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)I've yet to see one bad episode.
cab67
(2,993 posts)My wife is one. So are the people shes worked with at three institutions.
They dont share your assessment. In fact some of them have to spend time getting their clients to realize that what they heard on his show is exploitative nonsense.
llashram
(6,265 posts)something of a veneer personality. Underneath, I had no trust. But that's just me.
Lunabell
(6,089 posts)I've never liked her personality. Too narcissistic . Too much of a show off.
Celerity
(43,422 posts)Chautauquas
(4,443 posts)Never understood why people think celebrities will make good politicians.
Tikki
(14,558 posts)She interviewed him on her show..as good as a endorsement and
never took time to interview Governor Davis.
schwarzenegger was not a good Governor or a good person. He was placed in office by big oil
and the energy companies.
She didnt care about the average resident here. It was about ratings and rich peers.
I believe she would do the same thing again.
Tikki
deurbano
(2,895 posts)Helping out their rich, peer buddies. (For Oprah, I think it was more about Maria.)
BHDem53
(1,061 posts)Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)Rebl2
(13,528 posts)endorse President Obama? Did she have something to do with Rachel Rays fame? Just curious.
milestogo
(16,829 posts)Doc Sportello
(7,522 posts)This isn't a "hate fest" as some are calling it. It's bringing truth to power (and yes she has power and has used that to foist some pretty reprehensible people on the public, giving them a huge platform). People, even celebrities that some worship, should be held accountable for their actions.
moonscape
(4,673 posts)AIDS/HIV efforts/programs there with the UN. She didnt know anything about Oprah because she hadnt lived in the US for many decades. Her 1st intro to her was what she learned in Africa via people who reported on Oprahs visits to her school. Reportedly, she was always late, keeping people waiting, arrived with entourage, inappropriately dressed, prima donna, and was not beloved. My sister couldnt stand her because of the way she treated others.
PatSeg
(47,517 posts)Even when she was being "charitable", it was all about her and her massive ego. And yes, I heard many stories that she treated people like garbage.
I never liked her or her enormously overrated show.
Butterflylady
(3,545 posts)BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)She embarrassed herself badly with that one.
So many lies, and she challenged none of them.
Rabrrrrrr
(58,349 posts)and has her politics in the right place, she's still nothing more than a charlatan: and she pushed Dr Phil, Dr Oz, Joel Osteen, and so many other charlatans on the world stage.
And all those cars she gave away? I'd bet my retirement accounts that they never cost her a dime: all donations from manufacturers and show sponsors. All so she could haul in a bunch of poor people and capitalize on their poverty.
Leith
(7,809 posts)One of the reasons I hate public restrooms is that many women piss all over the toilet seat. There was a time when you couldn't even find a stall without it. They couldn't even be bothered to wipe their filth up after they left.
Oprah wrote one short piece about how they had a "tinkler" in their office. Almost overnight the incidences of finding piss all over the seat went down a lot. It became as rare to find a pissy toilet seat as it was to find a clean one during the height of that idiocy.
It may be a small thing, but when there's no other place to go when you need a restroom, it's important.
Soph0571
(9,685 posts)But you do you.
Trump? FFS.
She is not my cup of tea but she is a powerful example to young black women everywhere, but yeah, shut her up. Sigh.
Response to Soph0571 (Reply #90)
Post removed
Earth-shine
(4,044 posts)Essentially, The Secret book and movie state that you can have anything you want. You just have to manifest it. That takes mental discipline and a lot of directed wishing. Gotta put it out there for the universe to hear you. It will give you what you want.
The flip side of this theory is that if you don't get what you want (like the job, the spouse, or money for the house) it's your fault. You weren't strong enough.
I know some spiritual-type people who went into depressions blaming themselves for the things that happened to them because they believed in this manifesting theory.
Demovictory9
(32,457 posts)NewHendoLib
(60,015 posts)zentrum
(9,865 posts)AZLD4Candidate
(5,700 posts)I view them as IQ sponges draining IQ points and an exercise in the regimentation of viewers into a particular mindset.
I view all of them similar to AM Radio just from a different angle.
SergeStorms
(19,204 posts)We definitely seem to be a huge minority here though.
hlthe2b
(102,299 posts)I feel equally intense about the idiotic genre of "reality tv," however. The latter is hardly a positive for encouraging societal civility either.
Jon King
(1,910 posts)Cancel and hate everyone who we do not agree with, even if they have supported more Dems than Repugs over their careers. Literally everything good they have ever done is forgotten.
VA suburbs gave the Repugs the recipe and they will use it in the midterms. Crime, borders, radical left cancelling everyone and teaching kids they have no gender.....may be mostly lies, but it works. We are going to get utterly demolished.
I get the feeling few here see the train coming down the tracks.
BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)arlyellowdog
(866 posts)Oprah made people famous who are bad so some pure Democrats hate her. She also was a big part of making Barack Obama. Democrats should just say: Oprah is one of the most successful entertainers so she has plenty of controversy, as would be expected.
doc03
(35,351 posts)I would see she wrote a check for maybe $20 $30 to Joel Osteen nearly every month. She only had around $700 a month to live on and nearly every month I would have to give her money to help pay her bills. I tried to reason with her that she
couldn't afford to send him money but it was always "Its my money". So really I sent that SOB money. He preys on elderly people and lives in a mansion worth a hundred million and has cash stashed in his walls. I hate all the TV preachers they are nothing but thieves.
The SOBs should be in prison for fraud.
Butterflies
(1,240 posts)MarcA
(2,195 posts)If you don't, your yesterday's news. You can't always produce an A
on a regularly scheduled basis. So, either the consumers realize that
or you resort to sensationalism and empty goo-goo.
SergeStorms
(19,204 posts)Donahue, Oprah, Maury, The Chew, the this, the that..... it all sucks as far as I'm concerned.
That's why they put a channel selector and an off button on remote controls.
I actually remember a day when you had to get up and walk across the room to do those things! 🥵
Yeah, I'm old. 😉
Skittles
(153,169 posts)I think she is phony and even her "charity" is to bring attention to herself.
brooklynite
(94,608 posts)We can use a new conspiracy theory around here.....
Kaleva
(36,313 posts)brooklynite
(94,608 posts)...but I've come to understand that Hollywood thinks putting entertainers into talk show formats is popular.
childfreebychoice
(476 posts)didn't understand how nyad could be happy, fulfilled without god in her life
UTUSN
(70,713 posts)ecstatic
(32,712 posts)There is no comparison between her and tfg.
betsuni
(25,546 posts)You don't have to like her. Do you like the country? ... You better get out there and vote! ... Do you like democracy or do you want a demagogue?"
I loved that. She's a great Democrat.
Buckeye_Democrat
(14,855 posts)Oprah has often peddled junk-science, most likely because she's a nitwit about it herself.
She praised anti-vax Jenny McCarthy on her show too.
TlalocW
(15,384 posts)And whatever woo-idea he was pitching that day involved their holding a pendulum that they started swinging back and forth and then concentrating on making it rotate without any physical involvement, and it did! Because it was a FOUCALT PENDULUM. That's what they do!!! It gives evidence that the Earth rotates!
TlalocW
JI7
(89,252 posts)Quixote1818
(28,947 posts)dawn5651
(604 posts)would ask questions and would not do a follow ...to much fluff makes your brain go to mush...as far as dr. oz goes i hope to hell he is defeated and does not win a seat....
panfluteman
(2,065 posts)A: Orca Wind-free!
dflprincess
(28,079 posts)Oprah started out ok but the more successful she got the more bland and "uncontroversial" her show became. Really too bad, she could have used her platform for good rather than choosing a safe path to protect her own interests.
Roy Rolling
(6,921 posts)This is the first Im hearing that Oprah is to blame? Im surprised this has been kept secret for the entire decent into madness.
Im no fan of Oprah, nor a critic. But those now vocal because of her grooming of Doctor Oz are a little late to the party.
She would have to do a 180 to lose her fans and commercial clout.
mountain grammy
(26,626 posts)What a great show that was. Then Oprah gives us Dr. Phil, a total fraud, among the others you mentioned and several you didn't.
Thanks for nothing Oprah.. except your performance in The Color Purple
dlk
(11,570 posts)Like her or not, she has a compelling personal story.
LastLiberal in PalmSprings
(12,586 posts)And I've been here since the site began. Apparently no subject touches a nerve as much as Oprah.
Raine
(30,540 posts)to make me a fan of her's.
Jakes Progress
(11,122 posts)I'm not a fan, but this pure slavering nastiness is telling. This is the kind of mindless hate the republicans dish for Hillary. Oprah has a lot of money, and she gives a lot of it to good causes. Though not an intellectual or a good judge of character, she just puts on a show. Let's not put Phil on a pedestal either. He did crap to get ratings a lot. Sure, we liked his politics, but he wasn't any better a judge of the times than Oprah. (Nader?)
Is the OP saying if I wanted to give him a new Chevy, that I would be a fraud and charlatan because I didn't pay the insurance on the car? Notice she didn't endorse oz for senate. In a democracy the states do decide.
If you don't like her, just don't watch her. Nobody is foisting her on you. Learn to use the remote.
Reading the thread, I see a lot of the language and vitriol reserved for women, especially for women of color. My mother always said when I reveal who I hate, it tells people more about me than the person I don't like.
As I said. I don't watch her, but I'm not jealous about it. I just don't watch.
(Oh, but she was terrific in The Color Purple.)
betsuni
(25,546 posts)Her story is an American one.
hlthe2b
(102,299 posts)Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)up this thread this morning. Evidence for meme that we eat our own
Jakes Progress
(11,122 posts)hlthe2b
(102,299 posts)Jakes Progress
(11,122 posts)Buckeye_Democrat
(14,855 posts)Joel Osteen, Dr. Phil, Dr. Oz and James Frey are all white males.
Yet you pointed out the supposed "hate" only against Oprah Winfrey.
Most of this thread consisted of well-deserved criticism, from my perspective.
ecstatic
(32,712 posts)the "charlatans" that she supposedly unleashed onto society may not have been assholes in the beginning. Some people change with fame.
Also, she has promoted quite a few notable individuals who have not morphed into greedy right-wing hacks.
Jakes Progress
(11,122 posts)Jakes Progress
(11,122 posts)I pointed out the reaction to Oprah. I did not address the others. They did not receive the vitriol that was dished to the rich, black woman.
You want to criticize, then do so. But most did not address their issues. They name called and dripped with nastiness. They just don't like her. No reason. They dredged up what they thought of to excuse their behavior.
If you think this thread was a reasoned criticism of a media personality, and you don't see the nastiness, then you make my point.
ecstatic
(32,712 posts)obamanut2012
(26,083 posts)DU has always hated Oprah, often for the dumbest things including buying an expensive purse.
Always, Osteen was a guest on her program, she didn't "make" him. Don't get why he is on the list.
Jakes Progress
(11,122 posts)betsuni
(25,546 posts)Last edited Thu Dec 30, 2021, 07:46 AM - Edit history (1)
Oprah isn't an intellectual. She's very American. What does "she was foisted upon us mean"? Because she's a Democrat? Conspiracy theory? Establishment elites? Purity test? She's rich so she's bad? Why the hate?
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)This entire OP is so bizarre.
lapucelle
(18,278 posts)She must also pay for the insurance.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)nitpicker
(7,153 posts)Who pays it? Her or the recipients?
True Blue American
(17,986 posts)Never changed from his first days as a WHIO TV newscaster to his switch to WLW-D talk show. His first guests were Rev. Bob Harrington , Bourbon Street Chaplain.vs. Madeline Murray O Hair.
MSNBC fired him for being against the lie of a Bush war. Phil did a vindication tour a few years ago. He was right. His big mistake was backing Ralph Nader.
OneBro
(1,159 posts)Venom is so easy to spew. Reading this thread is like reading the comments on ANY article on DailyMail about Harry and Meghan. Nothing but bile and auto-outrage.
Oprah obviously believes in the woo, and seems to be an easy mark for ickiest of smooth-talking purveyors of snake oil and religion, and the spirit world, but there is a LONG list of people who have done a lot worse than Oprah (and Meghan) yet dont consistently inspire such blind rage.
Even posts about the church protecting its army of pedo rapist priests dont garner such venom, and I still cant believe I just read a sentence like BFD, she gives away cars. Does she cover the costs for the insurance?
Does she cover the insurance? Dear Gawd. Her evil clearly knows no bounds. Forcing people to take unwanted, brand new cars, and I hear she didnt even offer to pay for gas and snacks for the kids.
ecstatic
(32,712 posts)MustLoveBeagles
(11,617 posts)yardwork
(61,662 posts)I've never been a fan.
twodogsbarking
(9,763 posts)except Oprah.
Butterflies
(1,240 posts)twodogsbarking
(9,763 posts)Picking on old black ladies.
Solomon
(12,311 posts)Yup.
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)No reason she should pay insurance, but the taxes are another thing.
Brainstormy
(2,380 posts)Dinesh D'Souza. Yuk.
Response to tenderfoot (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
madamesilverspurs
(15,806 posts)Since when did DUers decide it would be a good idea to emulate a rightwing flamefest? Thought we were supposed to be the alternative to such garbage.
.
MustLoveBeagles
(11,617 posts)Last edited Thu Dec 30, 2021, 04:48 PM - Edit history (1)
I'm not a fan but don't hate her either. There's some justified criticism of her but some posts have veered into mean girl bullying.
Tommymac
(7,263 posts)I dislike her and have never trusted her. Never listened to her advice, and found her show crass and full of ignorance.
I know years ago there was talk of her running for President...IMHO thank gawd she didn't. She is not qualified as a politician. Would have been a circus and she would have been aas ineffective as TFG, if not as insane.
7wo7rees
(5,128 posts)gulliver
(13,186 posts)It's not Oprah; it's Republicanism. Every single Republican should be voted out of every single office in every single election. Then you don't have to get angry and resentful about every little crack in our society where the effect of Republicanism bubbles through. As others have noted, trying to cancel Oprah is ridiculous and self-sabotaging for the left. I wouldn't be surprised to see a Republican ad ridiculing us over it, even if it's just a few people who didn't get their coffee or got up on the wrong side of the bed.
Arlandolcantley
(1 post)Ronan farrow book rape.
Oprah the boss. 2.6 billion. Dr. Oz yes fraud. Suze orman good. Dr. Phil ok.
Donahue dead?
gopiscrap
(23,761 posts)LittleGirl
(8,287 posts)And this thread is. Something. Else.
I havent watched Oprah in years but when I used to, she had the Obamas on and I was hooked. I knew hed make a good President and he was!
Carry on.
MustLoveBeagles
(11,617 posts)She has in the past promoted the crackpots listed in the OP. She deserves critism for that. That said, she's not a monster nor singlehandedly responsible for all the bad stuff they've said and done. She done plenty of good things too. People have the right not to like her for whatever reasons they choose and to be fair, not all of the critical posts were nasty. I was just caught off guard by the venom in some of the posts. Kind of over the top in my opinion.
WarGamer
(12,452 posts)A full throated endorsement would have probably cemented his chances at the Seat.
SylviaD
(721 posts)Sunsky
(1,737 posts)I will never diminish her accomplishments and her role as an African American media giant. So, Oprah destroyed the talk show genre, good grief. Really? Oprah gave many who looked like me hope and opportunity just by her presence on the television. With that said, I have disagreed with her on numerous occasions but does that make her contributions worthless? Definitely not. We should be able to disagree without belittling others.
Response to tenderfoot (Original post)
Celerity This message was self-deleted by its author.