General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThere was NO CREDIT AVAILABLE from anywhere in 2008. Car Cos would have been LIQUIDATED!
The banks were illiquid. There was no private placement. The markets were tanking. It had to be a govt loan.
Zynx
(21,328 posts)I will point out that Chrysler was owned by a private equity firm at the time all hell broke loose. No one was interested in it without government backing.
Bozita
(26,955 posts)Last edited Tue Oct 23, 2012, 01:55 AM - Edit history (1)
The Bush crime family and friends.
on edit: The above statement is TOTALLY false. Keep reading as this wrong is corrected.
jmowreader
(50,557 posts)The thing that killed Chrysler is the same thing that killed GM: their credit division was in the mortgage industry as well as the auto-loan industry. When mortgage finance blew up, it took both Chrysler and GM with it. IIRC Ford Motor Credit Corporation was not a mortgage player.
Bozita
(26,955 posts)My mistake.
amandabeech
(9,893 posts)No one was investing any money.
Robmey and Bain were MIA even though Robmey loves American cars so much.
moondust
(19,981 posts)is a euphemism for union busting, wage slashing, benefits destroying, and downsizing. It's the Romney plan for everything.
Bozita
(26,955 posts)OmahaBlueDog
(10,000 posts)You couldn't get a lease, either.
Bozita
(26,955 posts)It didn't get a lot of coverage in the MSM, but that killed production at Chrysler due to the percentage of new vehicles being sold on lease.
Segami
(14,923 posts)a battering ram!!!
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)neither wouldve anyone else, and they would have died and 5 million jobs would have gone away
Bozita
(26,955 posts)Without that, NO vehicles would have been sold.
Segami
(14,923 posts)hadn't rescued GM & Chrysler.
Ford would have closed because it wouldnt have been able to get parts, because the parts industry in this country was in arguably worse shape than the assemblers, Rattner said today at the Center for American Progress in Washington.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-10-09/ford-would-have-shut-without-auto-bailouts-rattner-says.html
reformist2
(9,841 posts)sad sally
(2,627 posts)grew up in Bloomfield Hills, one of America's wealthiest cities.
The Economist wrot on MittAnn's op-ed:
"Had the government not stepped in, GM might have restructured under normal bankruptcy procedures, without putting public money at risk", we said. But "given the panic that gripped private purse-strings...it is more likely that GM would have been liquidated, sending a cascade of destruction through the supply chain on which its rivals, too, depended." Even Ford, which avoided bankruptcy, feared the industry would collapse if GM went down. At the time that seemed like a real possibility. The credit markets were bone-dry, making the privately financed bankruptcy that Mr Romney favoured improbable. He conveniently ignores this bit of history in claiming to have been right all along.
Bozita
(26,955 posts)Last edited Tue Oct 23, 2012, 01:42 AM - Edit history (1)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1058120Yup, Mittens is just another of us Detroiters. Click on the link above. You'll see!
malaise
(268,998 posts)and he's been caught again - what a despicable human being - by any means necessary.
Damn I detest this ReTHUG scumbag.