General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsonenote
(42,700 posts)In particular, i can easily foresee the Supreme Court voting to grant a stay notwithstanding the fact that the lower court found that Trump didn't satisfy the test for a stay. After all, there's no appeal from the Supreme Court if it so decides.
And what especially concerns me is the issue of whether the Presidential Records Act is constitutional. The Court in Nixon v. GSA concluded that it was and thus it was inevitable that the District Court would reach the same conclusion. But Chief Justice Burger and then Associate Justice Rehnquist strongly dissented from that conclusion in the Nixon v. GSA case and it hardly would be a shock if a majority of today's Supreme Court decided to agree with the Burger/Rehnquist'position, overrule the Nixon v. GSA case on the constitutional issue, and rule in favor of Trump that the PRA is unconstitutional. I don't think that would be the correct ruling, but I wouldn't want to bet against it.
malaise
(268,993 posts)That is all
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,001 posts)onenote
(42,700 posts)maxrandb
(15,330 posts)It makes it much easier to determine that this current Supreme Court is illegitimate.
onenote
(42,700 posts)But with this Court, it would be foolish to assume that the majority will follow precedent (which is what I fear Tribe is doing).