 16 replies |
Author | Time | Post |
 Just wondering. Can a president of the USA, (Original post) |
bluestarone | Oct 2021 | OP |
| yonder | Oct 2021 | #1 | |
| Stuart G | Oct 2021 | #2 | |
| DetroitLegalBeagle | Oct 2021 | #3 | |
| malaise | Oct 2021 | #4 | |
| bluestarone | Oct 2021 | #6 | |
| totodeinhere | Oct 2021 | #7 | |
| malaise | Oct 2021 | #11 | |
| onenote | Oct 2021 | #16 | |
| malaise | Oct 2021 | #12 | |
| onenote | Oct 2021 | #13 | |
| totodeinhere | Oct 2021 | #15 | |
| Ocelot II | Oct 2021 | #5 | |
| unblock | Oct 2021 | #8 | |
| bluestarone | Oct 2021 | #9 | |
| onenote | Oct 2021 | #14 | |
| mahatmakanejeeves | Oct 2021 | #10 |
Response to bluestarone (Original post)
Sat Oct 9, 2021, 05:23 PM
yonder (8,553 posts)
1. I'm guessing no - separation of powers
Response to bluestarone (Original post)
Sat Oct 9, 2021, 05:24 PM
Stuart G (36,607 posts)
2. I am also guessing no...for the same reason as reply number 1...from... yonder..above..
Response to bluestarone (Original post)
Sat Oct 9, 2021, 05:33 PM
malaise (254,504 posts)
4. Glad you asked this
Response to malaise (Reply #4)
Sat Oct 9, 2021, 05:55 PM
bluestarone (14,724 posts)
6. Yea i also feel that some court decisions are FAST. BUT
|
Others just DRAG on and on. It's very discouraging when this happens. I'm thinking that IF they DID rule for DUMB ASS texas law then it's really time to ADD more judges!
 |
Response to malaise (Reply #4)
Sat Oct 9, 2021, 05:59 PM
totodeinhere (12,718 posts)
7. I know it is not supposed to be this way, but it seems to me that it has a lot to do with who
Response to totodeinhere (Reply #7)
Sat Oct 9, 2021, 06:09 PM
malaise (254,504 posts)
11. Yes the majority of judges on that circuit were nominated by the Slobfather
Response to malaise (Reply #11)
Sun Oct 10, 2021, 11:43 AM
16. Are you suggesting that circuit court membership should be evenly divided between parties?
Response to totodeinhere (Reply #7)
Sat Oct 9, 2021, 06:16 PM
13. One Clinton. One Bush. One Trump. Unanimous order.
Response to onenote (Reply #13)
Sun Oct 10, 2021, 10:37 AM
totodeinhere (12,718 posts)
15. Thanks for the info. That's what I was looking for.
Response to bluestarone (Original post)
Sat Oct 9, 2021, 05:51 PM
Ocelot II (106,934 posts)
5. No. TFG tried that and failed. There are processes that have to be followed
Response to bluestarone (Original post)
Sat Oct 9, 2021, 05:59 PM
unblock (51,287 posts)
8. The Supreme Court can and does move quickly when they want to
Response to unblock (Reply #8)
Sat Oct 9, 2021, 06:01 PM
bluestarone (14,724 posts)
9. Yea no kidding!
 |
Response to unblock (Reply #8)
Sat Oct 9, 2021, 06:42 PM
14. Yep. Fo example, they rejected the challenge to the 2020 election in a matter of days.
Response to bluestarone (Original post)
Sat Oct 9, 2021, 06:02 PM
mahatmakanejeeves (51,015 posts)
10. Sure. So can I.
