General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTo protect the supreme court's legitimacy, a conservative justice should step down
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/sep/21/supreme-court-legitimacy-conservative-justice-step-down
spanone
(135,844 posts)nycbos
(6,034 posts)Lovie777
(12,276 posts)Constitution protector they are not nor is the fucked up republican party.
They are pissing off people of "all" races. How in the hell could the 5 + 1 justices approve bounties on women besides the six weeks ban on abortion coupled with forced births on rape and incest victims.
They effing approved gerrymandering and my gawd will probably favor voter suppression laws.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)that FDR was so frustrated by the Supremes shutting down the New Deal that he saw increasing the Court as the only answer?
We'll get through this one way or another.
Midnight Writer
(21,768 posts)The Justices were institutionalist enough that they cared about the integrity and the future of the Court.
I'm afraid some of our current crop don't give a tinker's turd about the institution.
They are all about their agenda, reshaping the nation to fit a conservative, religious vision.
Fairness, precedence, even factual evidence, will all fly out the window with this bunch.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)We are wasting time. If we don't update the Voting Rights Act, and expand SCROTUS, American democracy is finished.
rpannier
(24,329 posts)and just die already
mountain grammy
(26,623 posts)UpInArms
(51,284 posts)And, as such, should both step down.
Eyeball_Kid
(7,432 posts)Jerry2144
(2,102 posts)In order to protect its legitimacy, the conservative justices must step down. Your concept is ok, just the amount is wrong
luv2fly
(2,475 posts)Then read the article and opted to go full-blown laughable.
DenaliDemocrat
(1,476 posts)Are SC justices THAT obtuse. Look at her legacy now - all in jeopardy. Tragic.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Merlot
(9,696 posts)She actually only had a very small window of time to resign, the first 2 years of Obamas' administration. After the republicans took the senate, she held on thinking she would retire if Hillary won, then she had to hope to make it until Biden was inaugurated.
Crunchy Frog
(26,587 posts)safely resigned.
JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)are toxic. I include Garland's usurper in that crew. We shouldn't have an AG Garland - we should have a Justice Garland.
yonder
(9,666 posts)had Democrats even attempted the same scheme McConnell successfully pulled off would've made the Benghazi consternation seem like an attaboy.
Yet here we are today.
themaguffin
(3,826 posts)DownriverDem
(6,228 posts)Would of, could of, should of was the message for 2016. The election was not just about trump v Hillary. It was about Federal judges and the Supreme Court. Yes, McConnell screwed us, but it wouldn't of happened if folks understood the 2016 election.
Response to DownriverDem (Reply #14)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
KS Toronado
(17,252 posts)Because reQublicOns are all about POWER and holding on to it.
Being FAIR is not in their playbook.
NCjack
(10,279 posts)that also is not going to happen.
CanonRay
(14,104 posts)and the assholes on the SCOTUS are still Republcans.
augyboston
(193 posts)Perhaps Coney Barrett, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Alito, Thomas and Roberts could all take up free diving, downhill mountain biking and backcountry skiing?!?
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)calimary
(81,304 posts)No CONservative will put his (OR her) country above personal profit or advantage. Theyre finally approaching where they want to be: in absolute control of everything. Theyre not about to give up now - when theyre finally THIS close.
Can Dems finally start growing a spine?
unblock
(52,248 posts)and i'm not so sure about roberts.
sick and tired of radical right-wingers being called "conservative".
empedocles
(15,751 posts)jmowreader
(50,559 posts)Iron Maiden put it like this: Only the good die young. All the evil seem to live forever.
Response to usaf-vet (Original post)
empedocles This message was self-deleted by its author.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)The Supremes are the most power-hungry politicians in the country, and sadly, that seems to be true on both sides. We can't persuade anybody on our own side to step down to protect the seat. No way we'd persuade the enemy to step down and cede power to our side.
jmowreader
(50,559 posts)Gorsuch is there because McConnell was pulling strings to prevent President Obama from seating a justice.
Kavanaugh is there because the FBI refused to do its job to prevent a walking disaster from being seated.
Barrett should step down because McConnell is a two-faced
uhh, what reprehensible animal deserves to be defamed by being compared to Mitch McConnell?
Thomas should step down because hes dead weight.
And Breyer, who is one of the few respectable justices, should step down because he deserves a pretty house on the west shore of Maui where he can just kick back and watch the sun set with a nice glass of iced tea.
For their replacements, find the five most centrist judges on the federal circuits.
Pepsidog
(6,254 posts)wackadoo wabbit
(1,167 posts)As the wonderful Jim Hightower said, "The middle of the road is for yellow lines and dead armadillos."
We need some activist judges from our side, judges who can give us rulings that expand civil rights, rulings like Brown v. Board of Education, Miranda v. Arizona, and Griswold v. Connecticut, to name a few. Recent rulings have been shrinking our rights; we need to expand them.
jmowreader
(50,559 posts)if the five centrists would roll back all the right wing crap and just restore the rights we lost to the wingers.
Girard442
(6,075 posts)Any justice who should step down on principle has no principles to drive them to step down
CaptainTruth
(6,594 posts)In other words, each president gets to replace the longest-serving SCOTUS judge once per presidential term. With a 4 year POTUS term & 9 SCOTUS judges that means each judge would serve for 36 years.
No it's not perfect but to me it's a lot better than the haphazard & entirely random (in terms of timing) way SCOTUS judges are replaced now.
If anyone has a better idea, let's hear it.
DFW
(54,403 posts)Just right wing hacks, Catholic hacks, members of Opus Dei, but "conservative?" Not a one of them.
harumph
(1,900 posts)We have a few members of this discussion board who not so subtly want to
fan the flames of conspiracism. One poster was asking why so many
Catholics... and not evangelicals? Of course, the Koch bros. et al. and Federalist Soc. want right wing
hacks that can at least write half-way decent briefs.
That would exclude Liberty alums and those of most "Christian" "universities."
DFW
(54,403 posts)The Republicans not only take it with them, they seem to give it equal weight to the Constitution they swore to uphold. I don't care if they swore to uphold their religion, too, but they have no business doing so when interpreting the Constitution. Not only do they have no business doing so, they have no RIGHT to do so. Sotomayor gets this, always has. The Republicans either don't get it, or (more likely) they ignore it because no one is sitting on THEIR shoulders reminding them of their oath. They are the common citizen's last line of defense, and instead, they act like fifth columnists for the enemy.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)Nothing "conservative" about any of them.
DFW
(54,403 posts)No one can stop them from coloring the sky green with a crayon, either. But neither action changes a thing.
AdamGG
(1,292 posts)It's important that Joe Biden get re-elected, but that's not guaranteed and Breyer (a good justice) is 83. After what happened with Ruth Bader Ginsburg, IMO Breyer should step aside and let Biden replace him with someone much younger.
fescuerescue
(4,448 posts)All 5.
I also think that all the Republicans in the Senate and House should resign.
And that everyday should be Christmas.
bucolic_frolic
(43,176 posts)I mean, those are THREE stolen seats. THREE.
I rest my case.