General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGun used in Atlanta murders was purchased *legally* yesterday.
Link to tweet
Tom Winter
@Tom_Winter
NEW: Two senior law enforcement officials briefed on the matter tell NBC News that the gun -- a 9mm handgun -- used by Robert Aaron Long in yesterdays shooting spree in Georgia was purchased legally and it was purchased yesterday prior to the shooting.
Reported w/ Mike Kosnar
10:18 AM · Mar 17, 2021
Gee, if only there had been a waiting period....
Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)He presumably would have waited for a few days, picked it up, and done the same thing.
Miguelito Loveless
(4,465 posts)and maybe he would have thought better of it, or mentioned his plans to someone...
I'll take anything that delays guns getting into people's hands.
Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)But making someone wait a week or two to pick up their fifth one? What's the point?
genxlib
(5,528 posts)What's the harm?
What is the goddam hurry to have multiple guns that you have to get the second one on demand?
Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)Example: I'm picking up a firearm today that I bought online and had shipped to my local gun shop. As per the law, I have to have them perform a background check, which will likely take around 30 minutes or less.
Could you please explain to me what public good would be served if I had to wait a couple of weeks to have 28 firearrms in
my collection rather than 27?
genxlib
(5,528 posts)If you can't see the problem with needing 28 guns then I won't try to convince you that a little bit of inconvenience is worth the wait.
Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)I'm never even going to shoot many of them. I'm primarily a collector, although I do some casual target shooting, and I do keep one firearm loaded and accessible while at home.
You still haven't explained what would be accomplished by making me wait a couple more weeks to pick up this particular gun.
Dorian Gray
(13,496 posts)Probably nothing. For someone who had a heated idea to shoot and kill someone? It would give them time to rethink their plan.
Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)Why would delaying their acquisition of a fifth firearm deter them in any way?
Dorian Gray
(13,496 posts)why did he go to buy a new one?
Maybe his parents removed the others from him possession because he was presenting problematic behaviors?
Who knows? But it could make a difference.
Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)There's no evidence (as far as I know) that massage parlor shooter had any other guns. We're speaking strictly of a typical person who owns four firearms, and desires a fifth. What point is served in delaying such a purchase? They already have four otther guns.
Dorian Gray
(13,496 posts)Hypothetical guy is same answer I gave above for you. It wouldn't make much of a difference. It may have made a difference in THIS case. Had he had to pause, he may not have gone through with it.
Response to Dial H For Hero (Reply #27)
ahoysrcsm This message was self-deleted by its author.
Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)to own them is more than enough justificaation.
PSPS
(13,600 posts)friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)jcgoldie
(11,631 posts)...is to keep someone from going out and buying a gun in a fit of rage or stupidity and murdering people just as this guy did. Waiting periods for firearms are a minor inconvenience compared to the potential alternative as proven in this case. The harder it is to buy guns the better.
Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)I acknowledged that there was possibly a rationale for making someone wait a reasonable time (say, a week) for one's first firearm.
Does that mean making it impossible to buy guns would be best?
jcgoldie
(11,631 posts)yes.
Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)The standard line from those in favor of increased gun control was, for the longest time, "Look...no one's trying to take any of your guns away. You're just being paranoid."
Then, not too long ago, it became "Look....no one's trying to take all of your guns away. You're just being paranoid."
Now, increasingly, I see many of those in favor of more gun control saying openly, "Look....we're just going to have to take all of your guns."
Qutzupalotl
(14,315 posts)Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)currently owned should be confiscated. My point still stands, though. Twenty years ago, one almost never saw those in favor of gun control asserting that it should be impossible to buy a gun. Now such opinions are much more commonly expressed.
Qutzupalotl
(14,315 posts)friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)It's your lot that seeks to stifle discussion.
Qutzupalotl
(14,315 posts)so maybe take a breath before you tell me about my lot.
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)You have my solemn promise that:
Unlike post #38, I won't attempt to put my words in someone else's mouth..
Qutzupalotl
(14,315 posts)And all I said was what the poster sounded like.
Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)leads you to that conclusion?
Qutzupalotl
(14,315 posts)compared to a few decades ago, when they dared not speak.
Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)It's hardly surprising that some of those in favor of it will finally say "To hell with it, just make all guns illegal".
But the fact is, it was quite rare for anyone to espouse such sentiments years ago, even with the anonymity of the Internet. I can't count the number of times someone would say "No one wants to take your guns!". Today...not so much.
Qutzupalotl
(14,315 posts)Thanks for the respectful dicussion.
Progressive Jones
(6,011 posts)Nothing in the 2nd Amendment prohibits that.
Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)Progressive Jones
(6,011 posts)Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)Bettie
(16,110 posts)why is a waiting period for number five an issue?
Too many things to shoot and not enough guns?
Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)It can also add to the cost of a gun. Suppose one is purchasing one's fifth firearm at a gun show. If the dealer isn't local, they would have to ship the gun to a local dealer who would transfer the gun to the buyer. This could easily add $100 to the final price ($50 shipping, $50 transfer fee)
Bettie
(16,110 posts)than the rights of people not to be shot to death.
Of course, you're right...everyone should just be able to walk out of any gun show or store with whatever shiny new tool of destruction they want, because....convenience.
I'm sure the convenience of gun owners is a huge comfort to the families of people who are killed by gun violence.
Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)keep anyone from being shot to death? Details, please.
When did I assert that anyone should be able to buy any kind of weapon? And please, be specific.
48656c6c6f20
(7,638 posts)A psych eval.
Response to 48656c6c6f20 (Reply #40)
Post removed
48656c6c6f20
(7,638 posts)If you collect guns fill the barrels with lead. It still has the same stroking value I am sure.
EX500rider
(10,849 posts)"I don't buy coins to shoot something or someone" neither do gun collectors, the amount of murders done with antique & collectable firearms nears zero.
Kingofalldems
(38,458 posts)Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)Target shooting, self defense, hunting, collecting...
Cirque du So-What
(25,941 posts)Not sorry, actually.
TexasLefty29
(190 posts)maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)Maybe he'd have used a knife, maybe he'd have used a swimming pool...
There are too many of these stories (alienated young males with homicidal intent) to just say "oh well".
Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)Given that one has a constitutional right to own a firearm (as per the SC), there surely comes a point at which a waiting period is so long as to be unconstitutional.
maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)GA says 0 minutes, I say 6 months.
I wonder what Anna Bui, 19, a University of Washington Bothell student from Everett, Jordan Ebner, 19, of Lake Stevens, and Jake Long, 19, of Everett would say?
Oh, right, we can't ask them; they're dead because 19 year old Allen Ivanov bought a MSSA, waited WA's mandated 10 days, passed a background check, read the instructions in his car outside a party they were at, and then killed them all.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Mukilteo_shooting
Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)I do like that at least one poster has had the honesty to say that they want to make buying guns illegal, period. Refreshing candor
Phoenix61
(17,006 posts)It seems youd prefer to be able to walk into your local gun store and walk out with whatever you fancy at the moment.
Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)Colorado, like 39 other states, has no waiting period.
Phoenix61
(17,006 posts)Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)panader0
(25,816 posts)You could have whipped out one of your arsenal and lived up to your name.
You would be soooo famous!
USALiberal
(10,877 posts)hunter
(38,317 posts)Ah, but you could kill someone, or a deer or rabbit for dinner, or the coyote who took your miniature poodle, or the idiot kid who broke into your house looking for guns...
What else is there?
If I want to go target shooting I can go bowling. Knocking all ten pins down with one shot is a kick.
Gun fetishes are disgusting.
Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)There's a remote chance that I would shoot someone and kill them in self defense. Much more likely (though still a remote possibility) is that I either simply wound them or not even shoot in the first place. By far the greatest likelihood is that I'll never point a gun at someone in anger.
As for why I own dozens of them? Because I enjoy collecting them, they've been a fantastic investment, and I enjoy using them safely and legally. And that's really all the reason I need, isn't it?
Qutzupalotl
(14,315 posts)Thom Hartmann writes:
Research published by the National Academy of Sciences found that these waiting periods have a substantial impact on reducing murders committed with guns, averaging around a 17% reduction in gun homicides avoiding roughly 750 gun homicides per year.
RockRaven
(14,972 posts)"But I'm angry now..."
aikoaiko
(34,170 posts)Or maybe he would have completely changed his mind in 7 days.
USALiberal
(10,877 posts)aikoaiko
(34,170 posts)friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)I'll leave it to the disinterested reader to decide just *who* is playing what part...
Blue Owl
(50,402 posts)Guns would be in every checkout aisle in the "impulse buy" racks as you're standing in line...
TexasLefty29
(190 posts)In a very civil manner, instead of black man who wouldve been shot at the scene. ...No different than the white privilege exhibited on Jan. 6th. Damn shame.
maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)John Allen Muhammad being the exception - and he was arrested alive.
TexasLefty29
(190 posts)As it is the fact that black people arent serial killers.
Psychopaths are white, overwhelmingly.
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)Shanti Shanti Shanti
(12,047 posts)Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)Shanti Shanti Shanti
(12,047 posts)hunter
(38,317 posts)... along with a mandatory two years of community service among people from different walks of life.
Fail that community service for racism, misogyny, religious intolerance, or any other flavor of hate, then no gun for you.
By the way, I think the second amendment as currently interpreted is fucking bullshit and that gun fetishes are disgusting.
Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)hunter
(38,317 posts)Heh.
Until then, in my family's Wild West traditions, fools and their guns are soon parted. That's the universe I live in. The law is something else.
Personally, I don't let anyone I'd care to shoot live in my head. Life is a lot less stressful that way.
It's not that I'm any kind of deeply sincere pacifist (as my mom's parent's were) or that I've never used a gun. I've been hunting, but not in the 21st century. These days I'm mostly vegetarian. That's for environmental reasons -- living lower on the food chain and all that.
I have been a victim of violence. I've been threatened by people with guns. I have a very nice scar on my arm from a knife. The asshole who did that probably would have shot me if he'd had a gun instead. I learned to avoid situations like that.
My dad and my father-in-law both served in the military but refused arms. My father-in-law was a Navy hospital corpsman assigned to the Marines, and my dad was a nearsighted Radar O'Reilly Army medical clerk. They were both at risk of fighting in Korea. By the luck of the draw they didn't.
The Navy wouldn't take me since I was a brash young fool with some serious health problems, but they did offer me a civilian job, which I rejected. Soon after I met my wife. We were science teachers in a big city school district, the kind of place where locker sweeps would regularly turn up guns.
I was never really interested in guns as a kid, but I played around a lot with home brew rockets and explosives, so I do have an appreciation for things that go BANG!
Response to hunter (Reply #36)
Post removed
Phoenix61
(17,006 posts)EX500rider
(10,849 posts)Phoenix61
(17,006 posts)violence understand my point. It seems you dont.
EX500rider
(10,849 posts)friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)I don't blame everyone who drinks, nor do I use said crash as a pretext for demanding the reinstatement of Prohibition
Phoenix61
(17,006 posts)What are your thoughts on driving after one DUI arrest? If you get a DUI when, if ever, do you get to drive again? Do you have to have special insurance because you had a DUI? Do you have to attend any classes? No one is advocating prohibition, just some long over due common sense.
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)That's a rather vague metric- in your own words, what would said "common sense" entail?
And why should *your* definition of 'common sense' be privileged over anyone elses'?
maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)They make you get a Driver's License, but then ANOTHER license to drive Commercial Vehicles?
And insurance? Every month? And you have to carry proof of it with you?
It's so unfair.
Don't even get me started on FIRE CONTROLLERS.
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)*They don't make would-be drivers ask law enforcement for permission to drive
*They don't have lists of suitable vehicles that vary from state to state
*They allow people to walk into a dealership with a check, and drive out with a car on the same day
*Driver's licenses are good everywhere, not just in the state they were issued in
maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)every mass murder we go through this same dance.
i'd like longer waiting periods to reduce the frequency of impulse-driven rampage shootings - of which this is a textbook example.
that doesn't makes me a "controller" or a "confiscator". we already accept that government can impose controls on firearms: full-automatics are tightly regulated. if you accept that regulation, aren't you a "controller", too?
it's like "you lot" DGAF that rampage shootings happen. "you lot" certainly don't have many constructive suggestions to reduce their frequency. "you lot" are such fatalists.
Kingofalldems
(38,458 posts)sanatanadharma
(3,707 posts)I don't need a gun, I simply desire a gun.
Why should I have to delay my satisfaction?
It is the kind of harassment that could make some angry enough to need a gun.
Guns are not killing machines, but they are merely marvelous technological tools for meyhem.
I hope to collect a full set, from a blunderbuss to an armored bus.
about society not personality.
Kingofalldems
(38,458 posts)Paladin
(28,264 posts)They were damn quiet, during trump's reign. No big surprise, there.
Kingofalldems
(38,458 posts)friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)I actually feel bad for them- knowledge of one's own political ineffacacy tend to make people somewhat cranky
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)No big surprise, there.
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)Response to friendly_iconoclast (Reply #42)
Chautauquas This message was self-deleted by its author.
Kingofalldems
(38,458 posts)hunter
(38,317 posts)They love their guns.
llmart
(15,540 posts)One more way we can thin the herd. It might take longer, but sniffing in that lead if they cast their own bullets may eventually make them die a slow death from cancer.
Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)Sorry to disappoint.....
llmart
(15,540 posts)Alas for you, I know several that do.
llmart
(15,540 posts)And transparent.
NickB79
(19,253 posts)After 4 years of Trump, I'm shocked we don't own MORE guns than the Trumpers, given how often they threaten to kill us.
Kingofalldems
(38,458 posts)moondust
(19,991 posts)He passed all them big gubment checks so he good.
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)moondust
(19,991 posts)that there isn't.
Welcome to ignore, gunny.
Response to moondust (Reply #73)
Post removed