General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEliminating the Presidential Pardon power
It is Andrew McCarthy at National Review that is proposing it. It is a good idea, but obviously, the reform doesn't come soon enough for it to stop Trump abusing it. Since you can do anything you want, I would propose that a compromise to remove pardon protections with a look back time that includes the last year of Trump's administration. Normally Ex post facto is wrong, but, given the level of corruption we have seen, it should happen.
Why did Obama issue a pardon to James Cartwright? This article talks about that pardon and cites it as a political pardon. The only other example of "political" Obama pardons were the ones for drug offenders which were compassionate and smart. So smart that one person who was missed, and even a little questionable given the surrounding circumstances, was pardoned by Trump in a real big show basically sticking it in the face of Obama.
https://www.nationalreview.com/magazine/2021/01/25/repeal-the-pardon-power/
Firestorm49
(4,128 posts)mitch96
(14,399 posts)Wounded Bear
(59,908 posts)exboyfil
(17,912 posts)Also consideration of what it takes to remove a President from office, but that will be much harder. It could be abused. It always takes the fucked up moves by Republicans that destroy a system. Al Gore should have fought like this in 2000 (or maybe he shouldn't have), but on one brings that up. Gore should have sent his mob to the Supreme Court (just kidding since he didn't have a mob).
2naSalit
(90,495 posts)dware
(13,576 posts)the Amendment would still need 3/4ths of the states to ratify it, 13 states can block any change to the Constitution.
That part will require citizens to make it so at that point.
struggle4progress
(119,231 posts)requirements to specify in the pardon the exact acts covered and/or a narrowly limited time period and to clarify that the pardon power does not extend in cases where the pardon might help cover-up a crime by the President
former9thward
(33,002 posts)But no matter. Even if it got through Congress it would take 37 states to change the pardon power in the Constitution. That would never happen.
exboyfil
(17,912 posts)That should be a strong selling point. They don't act on principle, they act on power.
marie999
(3,334 posts)former9thward
(33,002 posts)They have the same power and want to keep it. Also if this was seen as partisan, and focusing on Trump it would be seen that way, there would never be 37 states that would go along. The Republicans hold the majority of legislatures.
marie999
(3,334 posts)Buckeyeblue
(5,624 posts)There are more important things I would like to see as an amendment to the constitution.
exboyfil
(17,912 posts)Those other things aren't (which is an argument for another day because I think our system of government is doomed).
BGBD
(3,282 posts)But handing one guy unlimited power to pardon people was idiotic and a serious throwback to the monarch.
FakeNoose
(34,575 posts)Will there ever be another Chump?
I sure hope not, but the safeguards need to be established immediately.
former9thward
(33,002 posts)Happy Hoosier
(8,038 posts)Establish conflict of interest limits. Make it clear the President cannot pardon himself. Aloe Congress to override any Pardon.
MurrayDelph
(5,390 posts)and no one work which he had direct business ties.
Happy Hoosier
(8,038 posts)lettucebe
(2,339 posts)No pardoning in advance. That's pretty ridiculous. This needs to be taken more seriously, and obviously pardoning someone that's involved in your crimes isn't going to be allowed (not sure it's going to be allowed this time either but time will tell).