Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Stallion

(6,474 posts) Tue Nov 24, 2020, 01:27 AM Nov 2020

Biden Stretches Lead to 6,078,619 (3.9%)

BIDEN: 79,911,842 votes (51.0%)
TRUMP: 73,833,223 votes (47.1%)

https://cookpolitical.com/2020-national-popular-vote-tracker?

MSNBC estimated remaining votes votes 2,848,789 with 1,845,016 from New York alone coming mostly from NYC metro

I think 82 Million 4.5% margin and 7 Million vote victory sounds nice

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Biden Stretches Lead to 6,078,619 (3.9%) (Original Post) Stallion Nov 2020 OP

Better way to look at that: enki23 Nov 2020 #1

I want tRump to get into the 46's %-wise! A Brand New World Nov 2020 #2

Come on 82 million! RVN VET71 Nov 2020 #3

enki23

(7,788 posts)

1. Better way to look at that:

Reply to Stallion (Original post)

Tue Nov 24, 2020, 01:39 AM

Nov 2020

The number of votes for Biden is about 8% larger than the number of votes for Trump.

A Brand New World

(1,119 posts)

2. I want tRump to get into the 46's %-wise!

Reply to Stallion (Original post)

Tue Nov 24, 2020, 03:08 AM

Nov 2020

That would be awesome too!

RVN VET71

(2,690 posts)

3. Come on 82 million!

Reply to Stallion (Original post)

Tue Nov 24, 2020, 02:15 PM

Nov 2020

It would be nice to be able to say to any Trumpers who insist their guy won that Biden scored more than 80-freaking-million votes --- and to point out that the only serious fraud charges were against Republicans.

(I heard that bus loads of German skinheads were brought in from Europe to vote illegally for the Orange Anus. it must be true because people are talking about it everywhere.)

Reply to this discussion