General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWI recount request will NOT be statewide - it will be a PARTIAL recount in several key counties. No
Link to tweet
?s=21
John Roberts
@johnrobertsFox
UPDATE TO BREAKING: The @realDonaldTrump WI recount request will NOT be statewide - it will be a PARTIAL recount in several key counties. No word on WHICH counties yet.
LakeArenal
(28,819 posts)sunonmars
(8,656 posts)Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)But I doubt it'll work.
mercuryblues
(14,532 posts)the ones with a high percentage of the black population and the ones that broke heavily for Biden.
jcgoldie
(11,631 posts)I sense a pattern here... dispute results in Detroit, Philly, Atlanta... most likely Milwaukee... hmm what is it about the voting population in those places that Republicans object to? 🤔
Wounded Bear
(58,660 posts)mercuryblues
(14,532 posts)If a machine didn't pick up a vote it would be more likely to be a trump vote.
11 Bravo
(23,926 posts)Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)Some counties were counting, and subsequently accepting, ballots differently. One good example was the hanging chad. Some counties were accepting those votes, others weren't. So they ruled that violated the Equal Protection clause of the constitution - not the act of the partial recount itself.
11 Bravo
(23,926 posts)not a recount of votes cast in a state-wide election being conducted in some counties within that state, but not others, also violate that same Equal Protection clause?
central scrutinizer
(11,649 posts)Back in 2000, Oregon ballots required punching out the chad of your selection. My next door neighbor was hired as a chad plucker and he would look at the underside of the punch card and pick off any hanging chads.
PubliusEnigma
(1,583 posts)liberalmuse
(18,672 posts)Either the entire state or nothing.
roamer65
(36,745 posts)LiberalFighter
(50,942 posts)More likely to increase Biden's lead.
Now if he had targeted the red counties he might have a chance to increase his votes.
sunonmars
(8,656 posts)Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)Then they can say the results should not be certified.
It won't work but they're not actually trying to make up the gap - just find enough discrepancies in the recount to push a narrative that the selected counties having irregularities in their results.
central scrutinizer
(11,649 posts)They ran the numbers and projected that they can raise more than the cost of the recount and pocket the profit. Just another grift.
pamdb
(1,332 posts)Think maybe counties with heavily black population? Nawwwwww.
Wednesdays
(17,380 posts)pamdb
(1,332 posts)Think maybe counties with heavily black population? Nawwwwww.
Baitball Blogger
(46,716 posts)Did the Supreme Court claim that the entire state had to be recounted, to be fair? That Al Gore couldn't just cherry pick the counties?
roamer65
(36,745 posts)LisaL
(44,973 posts)I supposed Trump doesn't want to fork up $8 millions, but that's not a reason to allow partial recount. I hope our lawyers are on that STAT.