Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJack Dorsey of Twitter is testifying before the Commerce Committee on 230
Link to tweet
?s=20
He's tweeting his opening statement:
Link to tweet
?s=20
§230 gave internet services two important tools. The first provides immunity from liability for users content. The second provides Good Samaritan protections for content moderation and removal, even of constitutionally protected speech, as long as its done in good faith.
That concept of good faith is whats being challenged by many of you today. Some of you dont trust were acting in good faith. Thats the problem I want to focus on solving. How do services like Twitter earn your trust? How do we ensure more choice in the market if we dont?
There are three solutions wed like to propose to address the concerns raised, all focused on services that decide to moderate or remove content. They could be expansions to §230, new legislative frameworks, or a commitment to industry wide self-regulation best practices.
The first is requiring a services moderation process to be published. How are cases reported and reviewed? How are decisions made? What tools are used to enforce? Publishing answers to questions like these will make our process more robust and accountable to the people we serve.
The second is requiring a straightforward process to appeal decisions made by humans or algorithms. This ensures people can let us know when we don't get it right, so that we can fix any mistakes and make our processes better in the future.
And finally, much of the content people see today is determined by algorithms, with very little visibility into how they choose what they show. We took a first step in making this more transparent by building a button to turn off our home timeline algorithms. Its a good start.
Were inspired by the market approach suggested by Dr. Stephen Wolfram before this committee in June 2019. Enabling people to choose algorithms created by third parties to rank and filter their content is an incredibly energizing idea thats in reach. https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2019/06/testif
Requiring 1) moderation process and practices to be published, 2) a straightforward process to appeal decisions, and 3) best efforts around algorithmic choice, are suggestions to address the concerns we all have going forward. And theyre all achievable in short order.
Its critical as we consider these solutions, we optimize for new startups and independent developers. Doing so ensures a level playing field that increases the probability of competing ideas to help solve problems. We mustnt entrench the largest companies any further.
This is a personal preference but I'm not a fan of the beard. Or David Letterman's , for that matter.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 457 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jack Dorsey of Twitter is testifying before the Commerce Committee on 230 (Original Post)
octoberlib
Oct 2020
OP
hlthe2b
(102,842 posts)1. Lordy, I'm fine with well kempt (close cropped) beards, but this "mountain/militia man" trend
--which PREDATED COVID for any who think otherwise-- is jarring to me. What next? 1860's MUTTON CHOPS?
Sorry, but it is very very unappealing to me.
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)2. Same here! It doesn't look sanitary.
Roland99
(53,342 posts)3. Enabling people to choose algorithms created by third parties to rank & filter their content
hmm...interesting