Damn pity the 2016 voters handed Pelosi a butter knife rather than the wrecking ball she needed.

[Budi]

Own your role in this catastrophy.

💙Vote

[maxsolomon]

1. 2018?

I'm not sure what you think I could have done differently as a voter, but I'm pretty sure you just insulted me, and everyone else here.

[NurseJackie]

2. LOL! No he didn't.

[Budi]

3. Awwwws.. you really know what I meant.

[maxsolomon]

4. Actually I don't.

and I think the CONSTITUTION handed Pelosi a butter knife in 2018.

[Budi]

5. It's not about 2018.

[Statistical]

6. Then what the hell are you talking about? Chalk me up as another one confused.

[Budi]

7. Ok !

It a pretty clear statement.

[Budi]

10. It's not about 2018.

[greenjar_01]

9. Nobody has any clue what you're talking about

It's not clear.

[Budi]

12. Haaahaa. I see the crew has arrived.

Bye!

[greenjar_01]

13. I don't know what crew you're talking about

Your post is unclear.

[Retrograde]

11. The GOP won the House in 2016

Paul Ryan - who declined to run again in 2018 probably because he was afraid of losing - was Speaker of the House after that election. Pelosi was the minority leader.

[Budi]

14. 2016 was the year that mattered.

Yet they're still laying the blame on Pelosi, Schumer, the Dems...
They fkd it up & still refuse to admit their role.

So I ask they own their role & be quiet.

It's simple, as we watch every human & civil right fought hard for over the past 50 years disappear with the SC nom in the Senate & demanding Pelosi & her Congress get tougher & fight with that 2016 butter knife handed her.

Sick of the hypocrisy of those who rage against our Dems still today when they gave them nothing but a butter knife back in 2016. We needed the wrecking ball.

Just Vote 💙 ffs.

[Statistical]

15. Pelosi has nothing to do with the Supreme Court nominee not in 2016 and not today.

You do get that there are two chambers in Congress. The House and the Senate. The Senate confirms Supreme Court nominees and Pelosi is the Speaker of the House.

Voters gave Pelosi a majority. If Democrats had a majority in the Senate this confirmation wouldn't be happening. None of this has anything to do with either the House or Pelosi.

Maybe learn more and rant less.

[Budi]

16. YA. I know that. Re-read my post #14. Here. I'll make it easy for you.

It's simple, as we watch every human & civil right fought hard for over the past 50 years disappear with the SC nom in the Senate & demanding Pelosi & her Congress get tougher & fight with that 2016 butter knife handed her.

Sick of the hypocrisy of those who rage against our Dems still today when they gave them nothing but a butter knife back in 2016. We needed the wrecking ball.

Pelosi's push for more stimulus aide has now gone up in flames as well.

Thanks Trump!!
2016 was the year that mattered.
Get it?

[Statistical]

17. Once again Pelosi and the House have NOTHING to do with Confirmations which happen in the Senate.

If the House was 435 Democrats and 0 Republicans this confirmation would still be happening.

[Budi]

18. Once again. I know that. Once again, 2016 was the year that mattered.

None of this would be happening with the SC in the Senate NOR the Stimulus in the House had those who still just can't stop calling them weak, failed to give the Dems the wrecking ball they needed in 2016.

Their hypocrisy reeks.

[George II]

23. Only one post has mentioned or even hinted at the Supreme Court - #15

[Bettie]

19. Pretty sure everyone here voted on 2016

and for the Democratic candidate.

[Budi]

20. Lol. Pretty sure not.

The OP isn't about those who did.

[Bettie]

21. Well, the set of "2016 Voters" definitely includes

"People who voted for the Democratic candidate", but whatever, if you need to scream into the void, that's fine.

[Budi]

22. Lol. We are now living in the void ffs.

So stop blaming this shitshow on Pelosi, Schumer, Dems... at least twice a day here.

If you're not part of that then this doesn't apply to you.

It's pretty simple.

[kcr]

24. People sure do have short memories. I'm with you

I still remember all the shit posts about Clinton, like, "Fuck her with a brick"

[Budi]

25. Do you know that the coded word "Establishment" used by many to define her entire career,

was originally proposed by Steve Bannon in the early days thru social media, as a denigrating label they wanted to stick to HRC, along with several other one word (& easy to remember) campaign slogans, to damage her & slow her campaign down.

Yup. It was Bannon that started the"Establishment" label.

Guess who carried it forward!..

Sickening shit huh.
And they're still at it this day.

Pity what we are about to lose because they gave it all away back in of 2016.

💙🍃

[mcar]

26. We know not

I was here. I saw all the "conscience" voters, the ones who said SCOTUS wasn't important.

Some of them left this site bc they couldn't call HRC a c#nt here.

[JI7]

27. There were many people who were on here in 2016 and before that voted for Trump

Many of them attacked Obama for years while claiming to be on the left.

[Me.]

28. This