Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIt's Not 'Court Packing.' Don't Be A Moron and Call It That.
by Josh Marshall
I wrote this tweet because I thought I would become apoplectic when I saw that some Democrats were referring to expanding the Supreme Court as court packing or tacitly accepting the use of the phrase when asked about it by reporters. Any Democrat who uses this phrase should be, metaphorically at least, hit over the head with a stick.
---
The conservative movement has worked consistently and concertedly for roughly five decades to pack the federal judiciary with conservative ideologues. This is almost wholly novel in all of American history. Conservatives argue that they began this effort simply to undo the liberal dominance of the federal judiciary. But to the limited extent this was true in mid-20th century America, it was the product of a far more organic process. There was never a liberal equivalent of the Long March of planning, recruiting, funding and singular focus on taking over the third branch of government.
But the story takes a new turn in the first decade of the 21st century. Republicans have become increasingly pessimistic about their ability to win majority elections and have looked to the Courts to lock in present political power for the future.
In this sense, Republican court packing is of a piece with the anti-majoritarian turn of the party as a whole the increasing focus on voter suppression, aggressive and baroque legislative redistricting, the valorization of the electoral college and the unequal apportionment of the federal senate. These gambits may outrage you. But their most telling message is that they come from a party with little confidence in its ability to win majority elections. Indeed, almost the entirety of Republican politics today is based on the assumption that winning majority elections is hard and will only get harder. Extraordinary measures to limit voting or the impact of voting is one countermeasure and the other is taking hold of the federal judiciary to lock in political power now as a hedge against this unwelcome future.
---
People can call things anything they want. Partisans will use phrases to advance their partisan interests. It is comically inept to use the phrasing your opponents adopt in the hopes of knee-capping you. Court packing on its face means an illegitimate action. It means acting to secure favorable judicial decisions by political means. But this is not whats happening. The point of expanding the Court in addition to being a good idea in general is simply to get the Court out of the business of overruling majority legislation for corrupt partisan purposes, a power they have acquired through a perversion and abuse of the constitutional process.
We have gotten to this point by Republicans using every political power that is not expressly illegal to maximize their drive to dominate the courts to retain power while losing elections. That illegitimate gain can only continue if Democrats refuse to use legitimate and expressly constitutional means to undo the damage. Not doing so is not only political folly it is a danger to the constitutional order inasmuch as it encourages more Republican abuses.
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/its-not-court-packing-dont-be-a-moron-and-call-it-that
I wrote this tweet because I thought I would become apoplectic when I saw that some Democrats were referring to expanding the Supreme Court as court packing or tacitly accepting the use of the phrase when asked about it by reporters. Any Democrat who uses this phrase should be, metaphorically at least, hit over the head with a stick.
---
The conservative movement has worked consistently and concertedly for roughly five decades to pack the federal judiciary with conservative ideologues. This is almost wholly novel in all of American history. Conservatives argue that they began this effort simply to undo the liberal dominance of the federal judiciary. But to the limited extent this was true in mid-20th century America, it was the product of a far more organic process. There was never a liberal equivalent of the Long March of planning, recruiting, funding and singular focus on taking over the third branch of government.
But the story takes a new turn in the first decade of the 21st century. Republicans have become increasingly pessimistic about their ability to win majority elections and have looked to the Courts to lock in present political power for the future.
In this sense, Republican court packing is of a piece with the anti-majoritarian turn of the party as a whole the increasing focus on voter suppression, aggressive and baroque legislative redistricting, the valorization of the electoral college and the unequal apportionment of the federal senate. These gambits may outrage you. But their most telling message is that they come from a party with little confidence in its ability to win majority elections. Indeed, almost the entirety of Republican politics today is based on the assumption that winning majority elections is hard and will only get harder. Extraordinary measures to limit voting or the impact of voting is one countermeasure and the other is taking hold of the federal judiciary to lock in political power now as a hedge against this unwelcome future.
---
People can call things anything they want. Partisans will use phrases to advance their partisan interests. It is comically inept to use the phrasing your opponents adopt in the hopes of knee-capping you. Court packing on its face means an illegitimate action. It means acting to secure favorable judicial decisions by political means. But this is not whats happening. The point of expanding the Court in addition to being a good idea in general is simply to get the Court out of the business of overruling majority legislation for corrupt partisan purposes, a power they have acquired through a perversion and abuse of the constitutional process.
We have gotten to this point by Republicans using every political power that is not expressly illegal to maximize their drive to dominate the courts to retain power while losing elections. That illegitimate gain can only continue if Democrats refuse to use legitimate and expressly constitutional means to undo the damage. Not doing so is not only political folly it is a danger to the constitutional order inasmuch as it encourages more Republican abuses.
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/its-not-court-packing-dont-be-a-moron-and-call-it-that
I had trouble deciding which paragraphs to include and which to leave out. As usual, Josh Marshall hits the nail on the head on this topic. Please take the time to read the whole article.
Democrats must use every method available to them to bring our country back from the brink of fascism. I truly hope our leaders are listening.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 678 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It's Not 'Court Packing.' Don't Be A Moron and Call It That. (Original Post)
Poiuyt
Oct 2020
OP
elleng
(131,288 posts)1. Thanks.
Sharing.
Karma13612
(4,555 posts)2. The phrase I have been using
Since packing became a third-rail:
Court rebalancing.
And that is what we will do once we have the Senate and Presidency again.
We will re-balance both the Supreme Court and the district courts. We will add justices to improve work flow, decrease unsustainable workloads, and put the courts back into the proper balance.
Well, thats my suggestion at least.
Others viewpoints may differ.
Poiuyt
(18,133 posts)3. I just say expand the court so that it reflects the values of Americans
Or just "reform the courts."
Karma13612
(4,555 posts)4. That works too!👍nt
reform
Cosmocat
(14,583 posts)5. Reform
nm