Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe debate is like watching Jerry Springer. What an embarrassment. Not a real debate.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 821 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The debate is like watching Jerry Springer. What an embarrassment. Not a real debate. (Original Post)
Evolve Dammit
Sep 2020
OP
Guess I had hoped that a seasoned moderator would have rules that had consequences if not adhered to
Evolve Dammit
Sep 2020
#5
Spriinger would handle it a lot better than Wallace. Plus he had some bouncers.
Klaralven
Sep 2020
#3
procon
(15,805 posts)1. That's a good comparison; Jerry Springer. nt
Jirel
(2,025 posts)2. What did you think would happen?
Dump can not actually debate. All he can do is scream and misbehave. That's prime Jerry Springer material.
Evolve Dammit
(16,763 posts)5. Guess I had hoped that a seasoned moderator would have rules that had consequences if not adhered to
Jirel
(2,025 posts)7. You'd wish. I don't think anyone was ready for this level of BS, though.
The next debate, I expect, will be different. I don't think the next news org is going to allow him to constantly yap. I'll bet that they do insert a rule that says they will simply mute the mike of the person speaking, period. It makes any news org and every moderator that allows this look like an idiot.
I don't think Wallace is entirely at fault. I doubt that they expected this level of shitshow, much less discussed how to truly deal with this idiotic misbehavior. They should have - you prepare for worst-case scenarios. I don't see a serious news org allowing this yet again, having seen Dump's performance.
Klaralven
(7,510 posts)3. Spriinger would handle it a lot better than Wallace. Plus he had some bouncers.
Evolve Dammit
(16,763 posts)4. you are absolutely right! Steve, I need backup.
Klaralven
(7,510 posts)6. Jerry appears to still be around.
rockfordfile
(8,704 posts)8. That's because trump's losing. All he can do is interrupt.