General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsit can't be said enough. fuck Ralph Nader.
He called Obama a war criminal.
http://www.politico.com/story/0912/81649.html
This Guy works for the GOP, I don't care what any of his sycophants says.
WCGreen
(45,558 posts)No one pays him much attention anymore...
gopiscrap
(23,758 posts)I'm still pissed at him about 2000 NH would have gone to Gore if not for him and we wouldn't have had Shrub for 8 years!!!
a geek named Bob
(2,715 posts)fuck Ralph Nader with a horny blue, that's on speed
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Freedomofspeech
(4,223 posts)He is a media whore and nothing more.
Arctic Dave
(13,812 posts)If bush was doing what Obama was doing you would be calling him a war criminal too.
Clutch pearl often? Pftt.
tama
(9,137 posts)issues don't matter.
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)do you think? Have you a talent with the making of odds? I confess I haven't but even I can see that he odds must be quite high. Wouldn't you agree?
tama
(9,137 posts)AnOhioan
(2,894 posts)DevonRex
(22,541 posts)Since we don't seem to be up to your "standards."
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)So, are you a Mitt fan?
Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)I think it's fairly clear the poster was talking about the GOP.
AnOhioan
(2,894 posts)The post is decrying the tendency to overlook the faults of a Democrat just because they are a Democrat. If something is wrong, it is wrong, no matter who occupies the office.
If that is enough to have some ppl start calling for a tombstone, then so be it.
The paranoia exhibited by some members here is truly astounding
AnOhioan
(2,894 posts)DevonRex
(22,541 posts)And fuck Ralph Nader. He's nothing but scum. Lower than dog shit.
Arctic Dave
(13,812 posts)Internet nobody.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Arctic Dave
(13,812 posts)Civil wars suck but I don't cheer murder of other countries citizens.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Arctic Dave
(13,812 posts)I asked this question when all these "uprising" started,
What do you think Obama would do if you took up arms and tried to overthrow the governmnet? What would any government on this entire planet do?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)ergo lack the moral or international legal authority to use violence to crush dissent.
Last word is yours, mass murder apologist.
Arctic Dave
(13,812 posts)Saudi Arabia and Bahrain come to mind.
What is the "stan" we use as a base to make war on Afghanistan, you know, the one that tortures people?
bluedigger
(17,086 posts)Unless Locherbie is considered part of Libya now.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan_Am_Flight_103
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)renie408
(9,854 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Oh wait, that actually did happen.
Arctic Dave
(13,812 posts)Funny you equate civil war to killing other people citizens.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)whothose who reflexively support anti-American dictators.
Skittles
(153,153 posts)he is irrelevant
bluestate10
(10,942 posts)That asshole should be in prison beside Bush and Cheney. Nader knowingly cost sane people the election in 2000. And a bunch the very same fucking people that are whining about war and killing savage assholes with drones voted for Nader. Triple fuck Ralph Nader.
HarveyDarkey
(9,077 posts)The "two" parties are the only ones allowed to run? We need a strong third (or fourth) to keep the Dems & Repukes honest. They have such iron fisted control over the electoral process, even determining who can or cannot participate in the debates it's a crime.
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)Might you be lost?
HarveyDarkey
(9,077 posts)The you I referred to was the person I responded to. Just playing devil's advocate concerning their argument.
Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)On the other hand, if Ron Paul had run, many here would be celebrating a split Republican vote. Three parties are A-OK if it harms the "enemy."
pnwmom
(108,977 posts)from neocons to run against Democrats.
renie408
(9,854 posts)Nader took money from neocons to run. What an ass.
pnwmom
(108,977 posts)Summary
Thenaderfactor.com -- an anti-Nader group staffed by former Dean, Clark, and Gephardt campaigners -- released a new radio ad July 13 saying Nader is getting help from Republicans in three key states in hopes of stripping votes away from Kerry.
It says, "The same right-wing Republicans that are anti-choice and anti-environment are suddenly pro-Nader."
The ad's use of the terms "right wing" (which it uses six times) and "extremist" (used twice) are debatable, as is the term "anti-environment." But it is well documented that some Republican-leaning groups have worked for Nader, and that a few wealthy Republican donors have given money to the Nader campaign.
SNIP
Nader himself has welcomed Republican support. The Hartford Courant quoted him July 4: "If they want to help us speak freely inside the electoral arena, that's fine."
Response to bluestate10 (Reply #10)
HarveyDarkey This message was self-deleted by its author.
HarveyDarkey
(9,077 posts)Stop living in the past, get over it, & join the rest of us in the present.
spanone
(135,829 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Were dealing with a real sick, decaying Democratic Party that cant defend the country against the cruelest, most ignorant, most anti-worker, most war-mongering, most Wall Streetindentured Republican Party in its history, since the 1850s.
As for Romney, Nader said hes not the old Romney, governor of Massachusetts. Hes had a character and personality makeover. Hes just bought into the extreme right wing of the Republican Party, represented by Paul Ryan, and I dont think hes going to be able to shake that. Hes basically a corporation running for president masquerading as a human being.Nader doesnt let Republicans off easy, either, calling them the worst Republican Party in history.
Were dealing with a real sick, decaying Democratic Party that cant defend the country against the cruelest, most ignorant, most anti-worker, most war-mongering, most Wall Streetindentured Republican Party in its history, since the 1850s.
As for Romney, Nader said hes not the old Romney, governor of Massachusetts. Hes had a character and personality makeover. Hes just bought into the extreme right wing of the Republican Party, represented by Paul Ryan, and I dont think hes going to be able to shake that. Hes basically a corporation running for president masquerading as a human being.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0912/81649.html#ixzz27X8UcnHX
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)I will join in. Fuck Nader.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Post removed
Cha
(297,184 posts)fucking criminal.
banned from Kos
(4,017 posts)eom mfer.
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)phleshdef
(11,936 posts)If he wanted to be taken seriously, he should've worked the Democratic party from the inside, ran for Congress or Senate, and actually fought to do something useful to enable himself to be a credible candidate for the Presidency. I will give him plenty of credit for his early days as a consumer advocate. But he has shit all over his own legacy ever since.
2on2u
(1,843 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)Nader took cash from Limbaugh to bash Gore. He is all about himself.
MadHound
(34,179 posts)"There was something missing from the release of a tape showing Mitt Romney pandering to fat cats in Boca Raton, Florida with these very inflammatory words: There are 47 percent who are with him, (Obama) who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you name it. These are people who pay no income tax. Romney said his job is not to worry about those people.
Hey, Mitt, why start with the 47 percent? Fully 100 percent of the nations 500 biggest corporations are dependent on various kinds of corporate welfare subsidies, giveaways, bailouts, waivers, and other dazzling preferences while many pay no tax at all on very substantial profits"
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/09/20-7
After all, it was written by Nader
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)Are you scared? I didn't think so.
WeekendWarrior
(1,437 posts)Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)While some of that is understandable, a lot of it is just bizarre and--from my vantage point--funny.
AnOhioan
(2,894 posts)the absolute venom being spewed by the safely anonymous has always struck my funny bone. I think a post a week mentioning Nader, just to get the predictable faux outrage going is becoming a necessity.
WeekendWarrior
(1,437 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)has drool buckets on sale. Cheap.
redgreenandblue
(2,088 posts)Am I supposed to get riled up because someone calls things what they are?
porphyrian
(18,530 posts)Who gives a fuck? Nader is irrelevant. We are about to stomp the living shit out of Romney. Enjoy it for two seconds.