Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lindysalsagal

(20,680 posts)
Tue Jul 7, 2020, 10:08 AM Jul 2020

Fugelsang: Putin bought trump's Deutsche bank debt

No link. I'm listening to John Fugelsang's Sanity pod Cast (july 6, Pete Dominick)

Before Pete came on, Fugelsang made the assertion that based on events and public statements, he believes Putin bought trump's personal debt, and in turn sold all of us to Putin.

It comes along with the news that putin paid bounties for american soldier murders.

Ok, ok. You want evidence, proof, fingerprints. I know. But remember that John has lots of high level contacts, and he knows his shit. And is not sensationalist. And is reality based and honest. I think he's as credible as anyone can be.

So. If/when evidence is ever available, there couldn't be 2 worse cases of treason. He knew for a year that Putin made the bounties public and never denied it or did anything to stop it. Our own soldiers! And he personally profited by selling the influence of our government to our worst enemy.

Murder and corruption.

47 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fugelsang: Putin bought trump's Deutsche bank debt (Original Post) lindysalsagal Jul 2020 OP
This message was self-deleted by its author highplainsdem Jul 2020 #1
I mean, that's something we all assume right? Either Putin or some other Russian entity... themaguffin Jul 2020 #2
Yep. That's where I'm at. Pretty common knowledge. liberalla Jul 2020 #11
Deutsche Bank certainly seems to come up again and again in this conversation Mike 03 Jul 2020 #3
here is key sentence, "Fugelsang made the assertion that Putin paid Trump's personal debt" .... Stuart G Jul 2020 #4
Not necessarily "paid." It's more likely that Ilsa Jul 2020 #28
Which makes me think the tax records will never see the light of day bucolic_frolic Jul 2020 #5
The Supreme Court did that to Nixon. Lock him up. Jul 2020 #22
Different Supreme Court. Different society. BComplex Jul 2020 #33
But the precedent is in the records so they can't ignore it. Lock him up. Jul 2020 #34
Forgot to add: The word "SHALL" in the passed & signed Law... Lock him up. Jul 2020 #37
So Birtherism questioned Obama's patriotism so we didn't look closely at Trump's loyalties bucolic_frolic Jul 2020 #32
I said something along these lines last week... Javaman Jul 2020 #6
junior trump admitted years ago that russia made funds available , [that they couldn't empedocles Jul 2020 #7
We need evidence, not assertions. MineralMan Jul 2020 #8
The word (assertions) have to start some where. Even smoke signals start with the 1st puff of smoke. usaf-vet Jul 2020 #10
I wouldn't be surprised of Trump owned Putin money. MineralMan Jul 2020 #15
No, it brings attention to the matter...it is the first necessary step. Not useless at all. Tommymac Jul 2020 #20
Agreed. And hopefully if this idea starts to rise to the surface, people with that capacity will sta lindysalsagal Jul 2020 #18
This is from January via Forensic News Kitchari Jul 2020 #43
Watchu talkin bout willis! blakstoneranger Jul 2020 #9
But he did't win the election, damn it. Putin stole in for him. triron Jul 2020 #24
I wonder if the Mueller investigation uncovered any of this. C Moon Jul 2020 #12
I have always believed papa3times Jul 2020 #13
It will take years before the whole sordid story of the disaster that has PatrickforO Jul 2020 #14
Putin's Pay For Slay* program. Trump is making millions by killing us. lagomorph777 Jul 2020 #16
And I say he belongs in a special hell with the worst demons imaginable. triron Jul 2020 #23
Right now, that would be the Oval Office. lagomorph777 Jul 2020 #27
"SO MUCH WINNING" czarjak Jul 2020 #30
Republicans and Russians make for Shit Stew Champp Jul 2020 #17
It would fit the cilla4progress Jul 2020 #19
Trump belongs in a special hell. triron Jul 2020 #21
Lawrence O'Donnell made a similar claim a few months back LymphocyteLover Jul 2020 #25
Yes. When you look at everything wit this knowledge, it all makes sense. lindysalsagal Jul 2020 #26
agree. But it drives me crazy how uncurious the media seems to be about this LymphocyteLover Jul 2020 #38
We wouldn't know if anyone were looking into it, but international finance, Deutsche Bank lindysalsagal Jul 2020 #40
Yeah... that reminds me that there was a Deutsche Bank whistleblower LymphocyteLover Jul 2020 #45
Congress needs to find a way to change the requirements to Ilsa Jul 2020 #29
as they say bdamomma Jul 2020 #31
it would explain a lot of things Skittles Jul 2020 #35
IIRC Deutsche Bank formed a special division within the bank to encapsulate Trump's high risk loans pecosbob Jul 2020 #36
This has to be the case. zentrum Jul 2020 #39
Let's not forget Dan Jul 2020 #41
OH shite. I DID forget that. lindysalsagal Jul 2020 #42
this is all you gotta read Snoopy 7 Jul 2020 #44
HOLYHOLYHOLYHOLYCRAAAAPPPPPPPPP!!!!!! lindysalsagal Jul 2020 #47
I suspect... GeorgeGist Jul 2020 #46

Response to lindysalsagal (Original post)

liberalla

(9,243 posts)
11. Yep. That's where I'm at. Pretty common knowledge.
Tue Jul 7, 2020, 11:05 AM
Jul 2020

I'd still like the details, though. Seth Abramson will shed light on this, I would think.

Mike 03

(16,616 posts)
3. Deutsche Bank certainly seems to come up again and again in this conversation
Tue Jul 7, 2020, 10:19 AM
Jul 2020

about Trump (and Alfa Bank, possibly, as well).

It would be nice to have the DB records that are alleged to exist, by the son of a former DB employee who killed himself.

Remember those redacted cases Mueller handed off? Wasn't there speculation one or more of them may involve money transfers? Mueller subpoenaed a foreign bank, but I don't recall if we ever found out which one. I had guessed Alfa, but it could have been DB (but haven't they cooperated?).

Stuart G

(38,421 posts)
4. here is key sentence, "Fugelsang made the assertion that Putin paid Trump's personal debt" ....
Tue Jul 7, 2020, 10:21 AM
Jul 2020

......If true, & can be proven...."Impeachment #2"

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
28. Not necessarily "paid." It's more likely that
Tue Jul 7, 2020, 03:09 PM
Jul 2020

The notes were purchased by Putin. Now trump owes putin, legally, who can call him into default if trump screws up just once on the intricacies of his loan. Properties can be foreclosed upon, etc. Therefore, trump wants to do everything he can to make his new lender happy.

bucolic_frolic

(43,146 posts)
5. Which makes me think the tax records will never see the light of day
Tue Jul 7, 2020, 10:30 AM
Jul 2020

The Supreme Court won't do that to a sitting president. It would be ungentlemanly to the presidency. And they won't want to stir up this mess.

Even with all we've learned and been through, the process moves slowly. Chess moves, carefully choreographed, planned months and years ahead. Which should tell you something about the size of the problem.

In my view, drag in Deutsche Bank and you drag in the history of Deutsche Bank. A lot off things went underground after the war, even if many things were defused or stalemated.

Lock him up.

(6,928 posts)
22. The Supreme Court did that to Nixon.
Tue Jul 7, 2020, 12:43 PM
Jul 2020

And for more or less a "minor" offense (compared to this one).

They have "precedence" to justify if not.


Make Justice Great Again

Lock him up.

(6,928 posts)
34. But the precedent is in the records so they can't ignore it.
Tue Jul 7, 2020, 07:16 PM
Jul 2020

Whether or not they could find an acceptable justification for defying that precedent is up in the air.

They already ruled against the WH in many cases we thought they never would.

Barr is not in charge of the SC...

Lock him up.

(6,928 posts)
37. Forgot to add: The word "SHALL" in the passed & signed Law...
Tue Jul 7, 2020, 07:38 PM
Jul 2020

... is very tough to overturn.

Remember it's the House Ways and Means committee who requested his tax returns, not us, the public at large.

If the SC rules in the committee's favor, it's very unlikely we, the general public, will see them in full, but if the committee finds "irregularities" yeah, we will probably see what they are about (very specific).

bucolic_frolic

(43,146 posts)
32. So Birtherism questioned Obama's patriotism so we didn't look closely at Trump's loyalties
Tue Jul 7, 2020, 06:31 PM
Jul 2020

more or less.

Subtle projection, once again.

empedocles

(15,751 posts)
7. junior trump admitted years ago that russia made funds available , [that they couldn't
Tue Jul 7, 2020, 10:44 AM
Jul 2020

get elsewhere].

'Donald Trump's Many, Many, Many, Many Ties to Russia | Time
https://time.com/4433880/donald-trump-ties-to-russia

We see a lot of money pouring in from Russia,” Trump’s son, Donald Jr., said at a real estate conference in 2008, according to a trade publication, eTurboNews. The only instance that Trump'

MineralMan

(146,288 posts)
8. We need evidence, not assertions.
Tue Jul 7, 2020, 10:49 AM
Jul 2020

Anyone can assert anything. Let's see the evidence, and then we can go from there.

If you think I'm defending Trump, you're woefully incorrect. But we need evidence of this, not just someone's assertions.

usaf-vet

(6,181 posts)
10. The word (assertions) have to start some where. Even smoke signals start with the 1st puff of smoke.
Tue Jul 7, 2020, 11:05 AM
Jul 2020

If true treason would be to kind a description. I don't personally see it as a stretch.

We've all been asking what can Putin have on Trump that keeps him on the pro-Russian leash.

MineralMan

(146,288 posts)
15. I wouldn't be surprised of Trump owned Putin money.
Tue Jul 7, 2020, 11:35 AM
Jul 2020

It's just that someone asserting that something is true is really useless. Without evidence, there is no action that can be taken. So, simply making an assertion is useless.

Tommymac

(7,263 posts)
20. No, it brings attention to the matter...it is the first necessary step. Not useless at all.
Tue Jul 7, 2020, 12:42 PM
Jul 2020

As someone posted earlier - you always see the smoke before the fire.

Perhaps there is a legit reason for the smoke, perhaps not the one one thinks.

Allegations from credible sources must be investigated to discover the Truth.

lindysalsagal

(20,680 posts)
18. Agreed. And hopefully if this idea starts to rise to the surface, people with that capacity will sta
Tue Jul 7, 2020, 12:20 PM
Jul 2020

start urging those in government with the power to investigate international finances to uncover it.

but if you know anything about Fugelsang, there is no one I would trust more than him. And he knows people in very high places, even if he can't mention their names on air.

Kitchari

(2,166 posts)
43. This is from January via Forensic News
Tue Jul 7, 2020, 09:35 PM
Jul 2020

[link:https://forensicnews.net/2020/01/03/trump-deutsche-bank-loans-underwritten-by-russian-state-owned-bank-whistleblower-told-fbi/|]

I think I saw it here on DU a couple of weeks ago. Excerpt:

The Russian state bank VTB underwrote loans to Donald Trump via Deutsche Bank. Over the course of Trump’s relationship with DB, an inordinate amount of questionable, mismanaged & risky loans approved by Deutsche Bank to Trump required his Personal Guarantee which, over time, also lost its value.

Trump’s team at DB sought out creative ways to circumvent the varied protections DB’s compliance team institutionally implemented, & whether by happenstance or by design Trump’s loans became underwritten by Russia’s own VTB.
 

blakstoneranger

(333 posts)
9. Watchu talkin bout willis!
Tue Jul 7, 2020, 10:53 AM
Jul 2020

When trump won the 2016 election, he was over $950 million in debt. Much of this debt was owed to china. I read that china sold his debt to someone or something else. He also owed a huge chunk to Goldman/Sachs which is why Steve manuchin was hired as his treasury secretary (nuch was on the board of G/S). If putin bought trumps debt from china, it would explain trumps punk stance with Russia. If Putin called in that debt in its entirety, trump will be mugging old ladies on 5th ave for their purses.

THANK GOODNESS FOR THE NEW YORK TIMES!! WITHOUT THE TIMES, WE WOULD KNOW NOTHING ABOUT THIS CROOK!!

papa3times

(150 posts)
13. I have always believed
Tue Jul 7, 2020, 11:24 AM
Jul 2020

this and have said it to anyone who would listen for years. It makes total sense. A few hundred million dollars is nothing for Putin and is a small investment to get the sanctions lifted and back into the G-7 to make it the G-8. If the goddamned Supreme Court would do the right thing we could get our hands on the documentation to expose this criminal/traitor Trump for what he is! It will come out eventually someday but we need it now!

PatrickforO

(14,572 posts)
14. It will take years before the whole sordid story of the disaster that has
Tue Jul 7, 2020, 11:34 AM
Jul 2020

been the Trump presidency emerges.

Decades.

But history will not be kind to Trump or the Republicans.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
16. Putin's Pay For Slay* program. Trump is making millions by killing us.
Tue Jul 7, 2020, 11:59 AM
Jul 2020

Trump is killing us in multiple ways, including at the least:

Complicity with Putin's Taliban bounty payments to kill US troops.
Sabotage of the US response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Inflaming racial tensions to trigger a wave of white supremacist terror attacks.

*grateful to DUer "gratuitous" for the term.

LymphocyteLover

(5,644 posts)
25. Lawrence O'Donnell made a similar claim a few months back
Tue Jul 7, 2020, 12:52 PM
Jul 2020

and then had to walk it back a bit because his source didn't want to go public and he only had one source... IIRC


And FWIW, I'm pretty confident it's true because it connects a lot of dots.

lindysalsagal

(20,680 posts)
26. Yes. When you look at everything wit this knowledge, it all makes sense.
Tue Jul 7, 2020, 01:23 PM
Jul 2020

And that's really all there is to it. Corruption can be complicated, but it's not any deeper than fear and greed.

LymphocyteLover

(5,644 posts)
38. agree. But it drives me crazy how uncurious the media seems to be about this
Tue Jul 7, 2020, 07:49 PM
Jul 2020

as well as the long and criminal past of this president

lindysalsagal

(20,680 posts)
40. We wouldn't know if anyone were looking into it, but international finance, Deutsche Bank
Tue Jul 7, 2020, 08:26 PM
Jul 2020

doesn't have to reveal anything. Only other governments can investigate other governments, and even that's quite limited. That's what all the gangsters are counting on.

LymphocyteLover

(5,644 posts)
45. Yeah... that reminds me that there was a Deutsche Bank whistleblower
Wed Jul 8, 2020, 07:13 AM
Jul 2020

like the son of a dead banker released his father's files to a reporter for a small online news site. The story never got much traction but seem fairly damning.

Found it: https://forensicnews.net/2020/01/03/trump-deutsche-bank-loans-underwritten-by-russian-state-owned-bank-whistleblower-told-fbi/

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
29. Congress needs to find a way to change the requirements to
Tue Jul 7, 2020, 03:29 PM
Jul 2020

Run for office, even if it means amending the Constitution. Complete financial statements and tax returns, going back five or more years, should be required to be disclosed.

pecosbob

(7,538 posts)
36. IIRC Deutsche Bank formed a special division within the bank to encapsulate Trump's high risk loans
Tue Jul 7, 2020, 07:24 PM
Jul 2020

and further that this debt was specifically guaranteed by Russian oligarchs' money...in other words, Putin. I think this has been common knowlege for several months now.

Dan

(3,554 posts)
41. Let's not forget
Tue Jul 7, 2020, 08:27 PM
Jul 2020

Former SCOTUS Justice Kennedy...and his son that works/ed at Deutsche Bank.

I don’t think it will be years before we get a large part of the story, I think we start getting the information in the first term of the next president. I think that we as a nation are going to be in shock with what will be released. I think that the people that voted for Trump, the ones that still have the ability to feel shame (a minority of them) will be embarrassed and in denial of their voting for him.

I think sadly, we will end of being the laughing stock of the world for as a nation being taken in by a con man.

lindysalsagal

(20,680 posts)
42. OH shite. I DID forget that.
Tue Jul 7, 2020, 08:28 PM
Jul 2020

They found a way to implicate the right people to initiate and maintain the coverup.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fugelsang: Putin bought t...