General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPeter Navarro Crows about Hydroxychloroquine ..... watch Plump tonight say he was right all aong
I was called a 'errand boy' last night projecting on this. Fish lips will hit on it 'hughly' tonight
know your op·po·nent / arm yourself w knowledge
this is not going away and gives Plump a shinny object to rant about over bounty gate
Arshad et al (Henry Ford Hospital Study)
https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(20)30534-8/fulltext
Results
Of 2,541 patients, with a median total hospitalization time of 6 days (IQR: 4-10 days), median age was 64 years (IQR:53-76 years), 51% male, 56% African American, with median time to follow-up of 28.5 days (IQR:3-53). Overall in-hospital mortality was 18.1% (95% CI:16.6%-19.7%); by treatment: hydroxychloroquine?+?azithromycin, 157/783 (20.1% [95% CI: 17.3%-23.0%]), hydroxychloroquine alone, 162/1202 (13.5% [95% CI: 11.6%-15.5%]), azithromycin alone, 33/147 (22.4% [95% CI: 16.0%-30.1%]), and neither drug, 108/409 (26.4% [95% CI: 22.2%-31.0%]). Primary cause of mortality was respiratory failure (88%); no patient had documented torsades de pointes. From Cox regression modeling, predictors of mortality were age>65 years (HR:2.6 [95% CI:1.9-3.3]), white race (HR:1.7 [95% CI:1.4-2.1]), CKD (HR:1.7 [95%CI:1.4-2.1]), reduced O2 saturation level on admission (HR:1.5 [95%CI:1.1-2.1]), and ventilator use during admission (HR: 2.2 [95%CI:1.4-3.3]). Hydroxychloroquine provided a 66% hazard ratio reduction, and hydroxychloroquine?+?azithromycin 71% compared to neither treatment (p?<?0.001).
And an editorial discussing the limitations of the study:
editorial
https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(20)30530-0/fulltext
Press release from Henry Ford:
https://www.henryford.com/news/2020/07/hydro-treatment-study
No large adverse safety signal from HCQ re torsades although the QTc was monitored.
Squinch
(51,126 posts)newsboy
(89 posts)Squinch
(51,126 posts)NickB79
(19,321 posts)Apparently they failed to mention steroid drugs co-administered (that we now know improve survival rates) and dropped hundreds from the stats that weren't responding.
hlthe2b
(102,687 posts)Newest Reality
(12,712 posts)I guess a huge, steaming stream of word feces will be ejecting copiously from sphincter face's throat colon.
Ah, plastic sheets for the front row, because it's going to be worse than a Gallagher show.
42bambi
(1,753 posts)newsboy
(89 posts)newsboy
(89 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)newsboy
(89 posts)it is rational thought that drives 1 in competition from checkers to war to anticipate the next move of your opponent. This outcome is so predicable that there should already be a response from DEMs. Pretending that it wasn't published or that it has been debunked doesn't cut it. We should leave chance to Plump. Fish Lips has really wet the bed on so many fronts I actually sleep at night lately, but this is a pebble in our shoe. This study gives him a wedge for the first time in months.
Kingofalldems
(38,552 posts)mercuryblues
(14,581 posts)A study where they cherry picked the participants.
Lied about NYC treatment as compared to their own.
Lied about the treatment in the group that did better. They were also treated with a steroid that has been proven effective.
Then removed 267 from their study.
Makes me think you have stock in HC?
You got locked out of your other thread on this because you were being belligerent, so you start a new one?
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=13693970