Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

newsboy

(89 posts)
Fri Jul 3, 2020, 04:44 PM Jul 2020

Peter Navarro Crows about Hydroxychloroquine ..... watch Plump tonight say he was right all aong

I was called a 'errand boy' last night projecting on this. Fish lips will hit on it 'hughly' tonight

know your op·po·nent / arm yourself w knowledge

this is not going away and gives Plump a shinny object to rant about over bounty gate




Arshad et al (Henry Ford Hospital Study)
https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(20)30534-8/fulltext

Results
Of 2,541 patients, with a median total hospitalization time of 6 days (IQR: 4-10 days), median age was 64 years (IQR:53-76 years), 51% male, 56% African American, with median time to follow-up of 28.5 days (IQR:3-53). Overall in-hospital mortality was 18.1% (95% CI:16.6%-19.7%); by treatment: hydroxychloroquine?+?azithromycin, 157/783 (20.1% [95% CI: 17.3%-23.0%]), hydroxychloroquine alone, 162/1202 (13.5% [95% CI: 11.6%-15.5%]), azithromycin alone, 33/147 (22.4% [95% CI: 16.0%-30.1%]), and neither drug, 108/409 (26.4% [95% CI: 22.2%-31.0%])​. Primary cause of mortality was respiratory failure (88%); no patient had documented torsades de pointes. From Cox regression modeling, predictors of mortality were age>65 years (HR:2.6 [95% CI:1.9-3.3]), white race (HR:1.7 [95% CI:1.4-2.1]), CKD (HR:1.7 [95%CI:1.4-2.1]), reduced O2 saturation level on admission (HR:1.5 [95%CI:1.1-2.1]), and ventilator use during admission (HR: 2.2 [95%CI:1.4-3.3]). Hydroxychloroquine provided a 66% hazard ratio reduction, and hydroxychloroquine?+?azithromycin 71% compared to neither treatment (p?<?0.001).

And an editorial discussing the limitations of the study:
editorial
https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(20)30530-0/fulltext

Press release from Henry Ford:
https://www.henryford.com/news/2020/07/hydro-treatment-study

No large adverse safety signal from HCQ re torsades although the QTc was monitored.

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Peter Navarro Crows about Hydroxychloroquine ..... watch Plump tonight say he was right all aong (Original Post) newsboy Jul 2020 OP
You sure are working hard to spread this bogus story. Squinch Jul 2020 #1
Stick your head in the sand ..... newsboy Jul 2020 #4
Sure. You're just spreading this around to educate us. It's obvious. Totally. Squinch Jul 2020 #11
Other researchers are already tearing this study apart NickB79 Jul 2020 #2
As they damned well should. This study is crap. hlthe2b Jul 2020 #5
... demmiblue Jul 2020 #3
Thanks... Newest Reality Jul 2020 #6
The article is no longer available, "This page does not exist." Hmmmmmmmmm nt 42bambi Jul 2020 #7
U have to copy the entire link newsboy Jul 2020 #9
OK ..... trumpers will NOT shove this down our throats Ur right newsboy Jul 2020 #8
Don't pretend it's either/or... it reflects poorly on rational thought. LanternWaste Jul 2020 #10
rational thought newsboy Jul 2020 #13
Here's something to shove down their throats: Kingofalldems Jul 2020 #12
Things that make you go Hmmm... mercuryblues Jul 2020 #14

NickB79

(19,321 posts)
2. Other researchers are already tearing this study apart
Fri Jul 3, 2020, 04:50 PM
Jul 2020

Apparently they failed to mention steroid drugs co-administered (that we now know improve survival rates) and dropped hundreds from the stats that weren't responding.

Newest Reality

(12,712 posts)
6. Thanks...
Fri Jul 3, 2020, 04:56 PM
Jul 2020

I guess a huge, steaming stream of word feces will be ejecting copiously from sphincter face's throat colon.

Ah, plastic sheets for the front row, because it's going to be worse than a Gallagher show.

 

newsboy

(89 posts)
13. rational thought
Fri Jul 3, 2020, 07:35 PM
Jul 2020

it is rational thought that drives 1 in competition from checkers to war to anticipate the next move of your opponent. This outcome is so predicable that there should already be a response from DEMs. Pretending that it wasn't published or that it has been debunked doesn't cut it. We should leave chance to Plump. Fish Lips has really wet the bed on so many fronts I actually sleep at night lately, but this is a pebble in our shoe. This study gives him a wedge for the first time in months.

mercuryblues

(14,581 posts)
14. Things that make you go Hmmm...
Sat Jul 4, 2020, 11:18 AM
Jul 2020

A study where they cherry picked the participants.

Lied about NYC treatment as compared to their own.

Lied about the treatment in the group that did better. They were also treated with a steroid that has been proven effective.

Then removed 267 from their study.

Makes me think you have stock in HC?

You got locked out of your other thread on this because you were being belligerent, so you start a new one?

https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=13693970

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Peter Navarro Crows about...