General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRe: NYT Scrub Story - 'Top Romney Adviser: `Apology’ Statement Fit Our Narrative, So We Ran With It'
First: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021334310
Now...
Posted at 12:08 PM ET, 09/13/2012
Top Romney adviser: `Apology statement fit our narrative, so we ran with it
By Greg Sargent - WaPo
<snip>
In a post thats generating some attention today, Josh Marshall pointed out that last nights New York Times story detailing the Romney camps step-by-step thinking on the Embassy attacks was replaced with another version that was missing key reporting. The new version removed a quote from a top Romney adviser in which he was perhaps overly candid about what motivated the Romney camp to put out its statement claiming Obama sympathized with the attackers.
Ive determined what happened here. Im not particularly interested in criticizing the Times over this; stories get rewritten all the time. What is more interesting to me is that it is now very clear who that adviser was.
In short, its now clear that top Romney policy director Lanhee Chen basically confirmed to the Times even though he was not quoted on record doing so that the Romney camp attacked Obama in the way it did because it fit the campaigns predetermined narrative.
Heres the key quote in the original version of the story (with the subsequently removed part in bold):
As Josh noted, this is akin to the Romney camp admitting: we saw this thing happen. It fit with our campaign narrative. So we pounced.
That quote is missing from the current version of the story. But the second half of it is on the record from Chen:
So, what plainly happened here is that Chen agreed to put the second half of the quote on the record, but not the first half. Yet its obvious that Chen is the one who said that the campaign pounced on the Libya situation because it fit the campaigns narrative.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)waiting for more information.
Alright, Whats Up?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021332360
Exposing the lies.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)polichick
(37,152 posts)pot. kettle. black.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)are they reading the same play book??
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Great leaders aren't defined by consensus.
By KARL ROVE
President Barack Obama has finished the second leg of his international confession tour. In less than 100 days, he has apologized on three continents for what he views as the sins of America and his predecessors.
Mr. Obama told the French (the French!) that America "has shown arrogance and been dismissive, even derisive" toward Europe. In Prague, he said America has "a moral responsibility to act" on arms control because only the U.S. had "used a nuclear weapon." In London, he said that decisions about the world financial system were no longer made by "just Roosevelt and Churchill sitting in a room with a brandy" -- as if that were a bad thing. And in Latin America, he said the U.S. had not "pursued and sustained engagement with our neighbors" because we "failed to see that our own progress is tied directly to progress throughout the Americas."
By confessing our nation's sins, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said that Mr. Obama has "changed the image of America around the world" and made the U.S. "safer and stronger." As evidence, Mr. Gibbs pointed to the absence of protesters during the Summit of the Americas this past weekend...
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124044156269345357.html
There's a lot more at the link there. I've heard this stuff repeated ad nauseam since that date forward. Karl Rove is on Romney's team. And all of America knows it, so why shouldn't they keep using it?
Obama can't win with the sick logic they pull. If he treated other nations with respect and says the truths most sane people know, he's caught up in the mantras:
No backbone, no balls, soft on terror, anti-American, etc. If he does act on anything, or doesn't end the wars fast enough or keeps on sending money to that military, he's a warmongering, baby-killing, nazifascistcommie, and gonna send all the patriots to FEMA camps.
Just at the same time he'll import a boatload of jihadists from Gitmo, And since he dared to ask Islamic nations to work with him, it proves he's working for that world wide caliphate the Muslims are all supposed to want! And if he speaks against the Christian Taliban at home, he doesn't love God and Jesus like Mitt does.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124044156269345357.html
RagAss
(13,832 posts)Skittles
(153,174 posts)I mean, OMG
Liberalynn
(7,549 posts)in 2016 they will have to run a rock.
Who knew that someone dumber than Dubya existed? Leave it to the Pukes to find that person.
Skittles
(153,174 posts)Rick Perry is my governor
JBoy
(8,021 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)with an unreliable narrator.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)It's Feck.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)The New York Times public editor Margaret Sullivan weighed in on the issue of a substantially revised story on Mitt Romney's response to the violence against U.S. diplomats in Egypt and Libya, concluding that both versions of the Times' story should have remained online. The paper's approach to editing and revising online stories is always evolving, Sullivan wrote, adding:
But in this case, the stories were very different in wording, if not in intent, and the quotes from Romney advisers were striking ones to remove altogether.
Its clear to me that these two versions should have been treated as different stories and that both should have remained accessible on the Web site.
The Times explained to TPM on Thursday that the paper preferred to use on-the-record quotes over the quotes from unnamed sources.
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/nyt-public-editor-both-versions-of-story-on
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)Judy Miller!