Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGREAT site for projections of hospital resource use, time to peak, and deaths
https://covid19.healthdata.org/projectionsCheck it out. Use the drop down for state-specific estimates.
Current overall projection of deaths is about 80,000 (range 40,000 to 160,000)
----------------
Reddit thread explaining some background:
https://www.reddit.com/r/SeattleWA/comments/fpkg9v/ihme_in_seattle_whom_i_work_for_just_released_our/
------------------
On edit:
Also check out data visualizations here: https://www.reddit.com/r/COVID19_data/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
12 replies, 899 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
12 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
GREAT site for projections of hospital resource use, time to peak, and deaths (Original Post)
pat_k
Mar 2020
OP
Did you happen to see "The projections assume the continuation of strong social distancing measures"
pat_k
Mar 2020
#6
It's from IHME -- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington.
pat_k
Mar 2020
#7
Says "The projections assume continuation of strong social distancing measures & other protective
Bernardo de La Paz
Mar 2020
#8
Squinch
(50,954 posts)1. That's a ridiculously low death estimate. I think BEST case
scenario is at least 10 times that. Probably much worse.
For the US alone.
pat_k
(9,313 posts)2. I'm not so sure. Check out the background (added link to reddit thread about it)
40,000 to 160,000 is still an appalling number.
I am wary of too many "worse case" projections on very limited data floating around.
When (hopefully) the worst case doesn't materialize because we maintain precautions, vastly expand testing, and then, based on the data, implement more targeted containment efforts, the Republican noise machine will be crowing about how we were all just a bunch of fear mongers.
Squinch
(50,954 posts)3. I'm sure. And I don't care what reddit says.
pat_k
(9,313 posts)4. It's the background and expertise of study source...
... not some random reddit discussion.
Squinch
(50,954 posts)5. I dont see anything that says expertise in those links. And 80,000 deaths is
ridiculous.
pat_k
(9,313 posts)6. Did you happen to see "The projections assume the continuation of strong social distancing measures"
pat_k
(9,313 posts)7. It's from IHME -- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,002 posts)8. Says "The projections assume continuation of strong social distancing measures & other protective
Right at the top:
The projections assume the continuation of strong social distancing measures and other protective measures.
GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)9. Thanks. Good resource.
pat_k
(9,313 posts)10. In case you missed it, here's another resource for testing and other data by state.
https://covidtracking.com/
It's a project spearheaded by the Atlantic.
It provides testing numbers -- positive, negative, pending, along with hospitalized, and deaths for each state. It grades the quality of the data, which is wonderful.
It also provides links to numbers over time so you can see the changes, as well as links to best sources of information for each state.
And you can download as a spreadsheet, so you can easily add data, like pop, and calculations. (Wish they included figures per capita, but can't have everything.)
It's a project spearheaded by the Atlantic.
It provides testing numbers -- positive, negative, pending, along with hospitalized, and deaths for each state. It grades the quality of the data, which is wonderful.
It also provides links to numbers over time so you can see the changes, as well as links to best sources of information for each state.
And you can download as a spreadsheet, so you can easily add data, like pop, and calculations. (Wish they included figures per capita, but can't have everything.)
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,349 posts)11. Thanks! Good link.
pat_k
(9,313 posts)12. Interesting data visualizations here: