Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsItaly's Coronavirus deaths increase by 133 in a day.
Last edited Sun Mar 8, 2020, 03:59 PM - Edit history (1)
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 841 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Italy's Coronavirus deaths increase by 133 in a day. (Original Post)
Doodley
Mar 2020
OP
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)1. That's cumulative
not per day. Still serious, though.
Doodley
(9,088 posts)2. You are mistaken. 133 increase in a day.
The number of people to have died from the coronavirus in Italy has shot up by 133 in a day to 366, officials say.
The total number of infections leapt 25% to 7,375 from 5,883, according to the Civil Protection agency.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-51793619
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)3. I was just trying to clarify
that it was not 233 people in Italy who died on one day, and another 366 the next day, that's all. It seemed unclear to me from the subject line of the OP, and not everybody's going to click on the link to drill down to the fact that the 366 is indeed a cumulative figure.
Your post above (the one I'm responding to) is certainly more clear.
Doodley
(9,088 posts)5. I apologize. I agree, I was not clear. Thanks for pointing out. I will change OP.
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)4. Wow
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)6. Damn