Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rep Swalwell: We have enough evidence of an extortion scheme (Original Post) kpete Nov 2019 OP
Extortion is far more meaningful terminology to the general public than quid pro quo nt Jarqui Nov 2019 #1
Defining Quid Pro Quo as This for that.... Grammy23 Nov 2019 #2

Grammy23

(5,810 posts)
2. Defining Quid Pro Quo as This for that....
Sun Nov 10, 2019, 02:54 PM
Nov 2019

Which is often how it is made easier for people to understand the words ... makes it sound almost innocent. Which it is not. But said that way, it takes a lot of the feeling of it being a criminal act out of it.

Extortion is another matter. Most people have seen enough crime shows or movies to get that extortion is a crime. And not a trivial matter. The House majority need to continue using words like extortion, bribery and shake down so the average person gets it. Most of them already know tRump is a thug who gets other people to do his dirty work for him. Start using the words that will convey to them that this is no different than any other deal he is part of. Those that wanted him to run the country like he runs his business should be very happy because that is exactly what he did.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rep Swalwell: We have eno...