Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWait, what? NYT: LOSER45 thinking of leaving about 200 troops in eastern Syria now?
U.S. commandos may stay to fight ISIS in Syria afterall -- Trump said to favor leaving about 200 troops in
eastern Syria to help combat ISIS and stymie the
Russians and Assad.
Link to tweet
I know Maggie Haberman is MF45s pal - did he ask her to road test this idea?
shit be cray, man
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 1015 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wait, what? NYT: LOSER45 thinking of leaving about 200 troops in eastern Syria now? (Original Post)
Leghorn21
Oct 2019
OP
brush
(53,776 posts)1. 200 troops? They can be neutralized pretty easily.
Zambero
(8,964 posts)2. Wait a minute...
It was my understanding that there were anywhere from 28 to 50 U.S. troops total stationed there (number varies according to differing reports) that had been hastily removed from the area. But now 200 are staying? This sounds more like a buildup.
bluestarone
(16,926 posts)3. Sounds like a good way to get troops injured!
What an asshole!
klook
(12,154 posts)4. Oh, nice -- first get rid of our allies in the region,
then strand our troops there without their help.
Is this worse than shooting somebody on 5th Avenue?? Or still within the zone of Republican acceptability?
Skittles
(153,159 posts)5. WTF
he is playing with these guys like he is four years old and they are little plastic green soldiers
2naSalit
(86,579 posts)8. To him that's all they are
little green soldiers on a diorama.
blm
(113,052 posts)9. Exactly. And by now they all KNOW it.
dawg day
(7,947 posts)6. So this is about the worst option of all-
They could be over-run in minutes. They don't have the security of the Kurds with them, or an actual sizeable force of Americans.
Trump -- Oh, I can't even say it.
blm
(113,052 posts)7. Russia giving back the base? Fvcking traitor tot.