General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumswe just couldn't do it. we had to wait until he really ruined something big.
it wasn't enough that he lied incesantly.
it wasn't enough that he asked russia to commit cybercrimes against a political opponent
it wasn't enough that he wouldn't release his tax returns
it wasn't enough that he insulted virtually any american who wasn't a rich, straight, white, christian, conservative, able-bodied male.
it wasn't enough that he dismissed any contrary fact as "fake news"
it wasn't enough that he complained that any contrary opinion was stifling conservatives' "free speech"
it wasn't enough that he blew a giant hole in the deficit nearly exclusively to benefit incredibly rich people
it wasn't enough that he encouraged violence
it wasn't enough that he put a target on the backs of actual journalists
it wasn't enough that he was accused of sexual harrassment/assault/rape over 50 times
it wasn't enough that he cheated on his wives
it wasn't enough that he paid people to keep them silent
it wasn't enough that he put his children in the white house
it wasn't enough that he steers white house guests and even the military to his private hotels for personal profit.
we couldn't get rid of him for any of those reasons.
we just had to wait until he did something like complelete screw up the middle east.
we just had to wait until he destroyed our credibility with our allies.
we just had to wait until he handed a huge strategic advantage over to russia
we just had to wait until he created a humanitarian disaster.
we just had to wait until he demonstrated himself to be *exactly* the complete disaster every bit of evidence assured us he would be.
why is it that people have to let it get far too horrible before they accept that a completely unacceptable situation must be fixed?
First Speaker
(4,858 posts)...even when history--and simple common sense--shows that it has, and does. Nobody believed that a minor military confrontation over Fort Sumter could lead to 600,000 dead. Nobody believed that a Balkan assassination could lead to a war that killed ten million. Nobody believed that a crazy exiled Russian radical could launch a revolution that would kill twenty million people. Nobody believed that a crank from the Vienna gutters could take over the most civilized country in Europe, leading to a war that killed fifty million people. All these things are inconceivable--until they happen. As for Trump...well, the disaster is barely begun. It's going to get much worse--and the GOP will go along with him every step of the way. God help us all...
dalton99a
(81,475 posts)- New York Times, Nov. 21, 1922
unblock
(52,208 posts)all the way down, people stand with their jaw on the floor but don't act to stop the further decline.
donnie has dominated the airwaves and our thoughts even though he's had over 50% disapproval ratings (or nearly so) pretty much the entire time. the media covers him like he was as popular as fdr even though he's clearly unpopular and toxic.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)mopinko
(70,090 posts)yeah, how far this asshole has gotten depresses the fuck out of me.
ie- the tariffs. he has absolutely no authority to impose tariffs, except in cases of national security interest. can someone tell me what national security interest is threatened by irish cheese?
he is crashing the ENTIRE WORLD ECONOMY. and folks just let that slide.
we need bigger guard rails.
unblock
(52,208 posts)i just did that as a quick off the top of my head. there's so much more, sadly.
yeah, he's corrupted everything he's touched. it's in the national security interest because he said so, end of discussion.
so now the president has the ability to raise taxes on americans (because that's what tariffs are) on a whim, and target them to affect industries and states and districts of his choosing. what could go possibly wrong with that...?
mopinko
(70,090 posts)i guess on the bright side, we are gonna need that green new deal pretty badly. maybe it can happen.
Response to mopinko (Reply #2)
elocs This message was self-deleted by its author.
maxsolomon
(33,327 posts)Pelosi was right; he had to self-impeach.
dewsgirl
(14,961 posts)written.
roamer65
(36,745 posts)You all KNOW its coming. Its inevitable now.
This fat lady is just beginning to clear her throat.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)The choices of many millions are not easily undone, and only fools and callous, feckless people (great overlap there) don't use their vote to make them come out right every election.
unblock
(52,208 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)turned into weapons of war. And not lost a single soldier in ours at least.
The time to stop this disaster was November 6, 2016. If I were you, I wouldn't waste a single calorie bemoaning the reality that national elections can't just be reversed afterward by those who voted against whoever won.
And even without Russia, what's not to understand that nearly half the nation is conservative and today are under the influence of very toxic Kool-Aid?
VOTE -- every time as if our nation's future depended on it.
― David Frum, Trumpocracy: The Corruption of the American Republic
unblock
(52,208 posts)at this point i am fairly convinced that hillary won the electoral college vote as well as the majority vote.
with all the hacking and criminality and narrow victories in just the right places, i can't see why republicans and russians would stop at not tampering with actual votes.
even in the paper ballot days, partisans would stuff ballot boxes and/or dump bags of ballots to manipulate elections.
electronic voting machines have only made it easier, at least for those with access....
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)If he dropped dead today our democracy would still be in grave danger.
Maybe under President Pence we could at least stabilize the Middle East and save some lives, perhaps at the sacrifice of some of our troops. Pence is more than a little a religious fanatic, a good servant of God through the wealthy, and has to be concerned about maintaining Christian and Big Oil strength there.
The danger to our democracy would increase under a competent Republican president, though. It's not Trump.
GoneOffShore
(17,339 posts)no matter how 'reasonable' they appear.
unblock
(52,208 posts)When he goes down, the right wing will be able to characterize him as the singular bad guy, (somehow) not at all like all those "normal" republicans.
They'll pay a price in the next election but then continue dragging the country down, just as they did with Nixon,
sandiapeach
(9 posts)I am am an old lady and I have heard of the demise of the GOP many times, but they have always come back and more loathsome than ever. With the fascist evangelicals, the 1%, FAUX and the rest of the hate media firmly in their pocket the GOP will not even feel a bump.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,412 posts)should have been campaign/Presidency-enders. In any other reality with any other candidate. Hillary was savaged over the e-mail server stuff that harmed nobody and was repeatedly shown to be a nothingburger, but Trump has gotten away with so much crazier stuff and, one-by-one, anybody who could have better controlled his worst impulses, anybody who could have told him "NO!" has left the building, leaving him surrounded by nothing but syncophants, eager and willing to stoke and perpetuate each and every delusion or fantasy that crosses Trump's mind.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)"stopping" him from doing anything that the courts will let him do until then.
GoneOffShore
(17,339 posts)It says so much about what many of us knew would happen back in November 2016.
unblock
(52,208 posts)Usually my posts drop like a stone.
GoneOffShore
(17,339 posts)It's right up there with the ones that Nance Greggs writes, and Bill Pitt wrote when he was still here.
unblock
(52,208 posts)Thank you indeed!
flying_wahini
(6,591 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)her losing was validation for them.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)...a Democratic president would have been gone within a few months of taking office if he/she had committed a fraction of the misdeeds committed by Trump.
If candidate A commits 1 infraction and candidate B commits 500 infractions, it is not 'fair' or 'balanced' if the media spends equal time talking about infractions of the respective candidates.
unblock
(52,208 posts)how much mileage did donnie get out of claiming that obama, a man born on u.s. soil, to an american citizen mother from kansas, wasn't a natural-born citizen?
that story would have gotten maybe as much attention as ted cruz being born in canada or mccain being born in panama, and any political neophyte peddling controversy about that would have gotten nowhere.
and then once the rampant lies and insults and scandals and so on became apparent, they would have been treated like gary johnson, the libertarian candidate in 2016 who only got coverage when it made him look weird.
they tanked hillary by focusing on complete non-scandals, email and benghazi, while essentially ignoring her accomplishments and plans and vision.
assuming donnie actually is removed (still a big if), the media might have a round of self-indulgent introspection, after which they will vow to do better next time, and they will fix nothing.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)...he/she would be removed for a fraction of what Trump has done.
As I posted yesterday, Republican bashing of the media has been a form of projection for many years now.
The media, as a whole, is awful--but not for the reasons Republicans claim. But by constantly attacking the media and making "liberal media" a household term, they've successfully undercut what is a very valid criticism of the media (with their false equivalencies, their fluff, their giving equal time to utter bullshit due to a warped sense of what constitutes fair reporting, etc.).
And that's hugely responsible for the mess in which we've found ourselves.
Democrats need to change the narrative regarding the media. That'll take a long time to do after ceding that ground for 40+ years.
unblock
(52,208 posts)Garrett78
(10,721 posts)50+ years of increasingly cruel and unhinged rhetoric and policy created a monster. That monster is the Republican Party as a whole (the electorate and the officeholders).
crazytown
(7,277 posts)On the contrary. He wanted to do it a year ago. There is no guarantee he would not have acted sooner, if the Dems had acted sooner.
unblock
(52,208 posts)i recognize that the problem has always been republican support for donnie, particularly in the senate.
i have no doubt democrats would have impeached him very early on if only republican senators cared about the country more than their own next primary contest.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)handmade34
(22,756 posts)it still isn't horrible enough... the Republicans will let him remain in the White House... it make me sick to think of this
unblock
(52,208 posts)i fear it will take a large number of american casualties to move them.
Lock him up.
(6,928 posts)Faux Snooze
Hate Radio
gordianot
(15,237 posts)Rape, financial fraud, racism, failed businesses and has not paid a price beyond wrecking his inheritance. He could have been stopped much earlier.
usaf-vet
(6,181 posts)I hope that you finally have had enough.
Most of us had enough with just his lying. And of course, putting kids in cages!
Stop talking, thinking, ignoring, hiding and blaming others. Stop this evil ignorant idiot from destroying whatever he touches.
Poiuyt
(18,123 posts)was the worst.
That and emoluments violations and colluding with Russia to steal the presidency.
It's hard to pick out just one.
unblock
(52,208 posts)so hard to keep track, and why should we have to? any unfounded accusation of a fraction of any one of these would kill a democrat's career.
usaf-vet
(6,181 posts)As a veteran, I pray our men and women make it out of the region safely.
Trump doesn't deserve to be called the C in C.
hibbing
(10,098 posts)BamaRefugee
(3,483 posts)ELECTORAL college that is, and it can possibly have the power to keep things intact and get way way way way worse than we imagine right now.
bluestarone
(16,926 posts)KICK!
Alwaysna
(574 posts)world wide wally
(21,742 posts)CaptainTruth
(6,589 posts)... Republicans in the Senate would have given him a fast & easy acquittal. Trump would still be president. All the terrible things that are happening now would have still happened. Nothing would be "fixed."
"why is it that people have to let it get far too horrible before they accept that a completely unacceptable situation must be fixed?"
That's an excellent question for Senate Republicans. Democrats realized & accepted long ago that this situation must be fixed. They also realize that impeachment followed by a quick & easy Senate acquittal doesn't fix anything.
Unfortunately, in order to actually fix the situation things have to be so bad that Republican Trump enablers in the Senate abandon him & vote to convict & remove him from office. And it has to be really bad for that to happen. So bad that they see they'll lose their seats if they keep supporting Trump, because all they really care about is winning their next election.
I desperately wish all of this were not true, but it is. It's the reality we face.
unblock
(52,208 posts)clearly democrats knew what was up before the election; we wanted hillary, and have always strongly disapproved of donnie.
senate republicans can't look past the next primary to do what's right for the nation. damn, it's not like they even lose control of the white house if they turn it over to pence, yet they still couldn't be bothered, and still may not.
Kurt V.
(5,624 posts)BlueWI
(1,736 posts)The Trump horror show is reality, not reality TV. Time is not on our side. We have to accept that any attempt to address this mess politically will not be quick and easy. It will require short term and long term strategy, with the risks high and outcomes uncertain.
unblock
(52,208 posts)BlueWI
(1,736 posts)yardwork
(61,599 posts)The rest of us knew this before 2016. That's why we voted for Hillary Clinton.
Skittles
(153,160 posts)it is SICKENING how long it has taken to start any semblance of an investigation
McCamy Taylor
(19,240 posts)Wounded Bear
(58,648 posts)Iggo
(47,552 posts)NCLefty
(3,678 posts)And it's not our fault Republicans didn't want to see his criminality--or that they now openly want him to get away with it.
KentuckyWoman
(6,679 posts)We chose not to. I don't believe we even push him from office before the end of his term.
We being Americans as a whole. The Democratic Party has pushed but Americans as a whole, not enough seem to care.
Beartracks
(12,809 posts)ramen
(790 posts)Every single thing you listed is true, abhorrent, unimaginatively authoritarian, and deeply unethical. It is simply insane that any of it happened, let alone that all of it happened in such a short timeframe.
But the fact the the *elected moron up there has acted like a moron hasn't all been impeachable. Much of it has been notably so, in my admittedly limited understanding, like the endless emoluments violations, or the obstruction of justice re: Mueller (that memorandum of understanding does not clear presidents from criminal activity. It was a one-off opinion), blah blather.
But, whatever else was simply unimaginably awful but not 'impeachable,' the bit where he extorted Ukraine's military aid over a hack-job on Joe Biden's son.. that is so nakedly impeachable that it is insane to do anything other than impeach. That is not simply banana republic bullshit, it is also objectively criminal and therefore differently actionable than just being a twat all the time about everything.
I wish he had done stuff like this first, before all the other catastrophic damage he has done, but I thank the Flying Spaghetti Monster that he finally did something so out in the open and so unabashedly. Again, I would have preferred it be something not awful, but it doesn't seem like part of his vibe.
unblock
(52,208 posts)i agree there are some things that aren't blatantly criminal or impeachable in and of themselves, like lying or appointing his children to white house positions. but he has done other things that are, such as the constant grifting and the over-the-top obstruction of justice.
the remarkable thing about the republican party is that they can't even bring themselves to really rebuke him for any of it. hopefully the camel's back is broken by now....
MrModerate
(9,753 posts)Because removing Trump without the rule of law governing the process would be more damaging to America (and ultimately the world) than gritting our teeth and toughing it out until 2020, and making sure he loses the election.
As it turns out, Dems are doing both. And by the time they hand off impeachment to the Senate, who knows how many friends Trump will have left in Washington?
unblock
(52,208 posts)and democrats have been strongly opposed to donnie from the get-go. he's had majority disapproval for nearly the entire time in office, which is truly remarkable.
yet it's only the betrayal of a key ally in a strategically critical region that seems to have raised eyebrows in the republican party.
republicans have been astonishingly ok with everything up to this point.
as if no one could have imagined such a thing, coming from an impulsive, ignorant, easily manipulated, sociopathic, supremely arrogant idiot.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)And what could have been done earlier - or even now - to stop him from doing anything?
unblock
(52,208 posts)it requires more than a few senate republicans and/or foxnews to be willing to take donnie down at least a few notches.
sadly, only retiring politicians seem to be the only republicans capable of even mildly criticizing donnie.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)substantial to stop him, especially before February of this year when we got the House back.
And even now, there is no way to remove him prior to January 2021, so attacking Democratic leaders for "not doing anything" isn't really justified.
unblock
(52,208 posts)i meant "we the people". all of us, collectively, as a nation.
of course democrats would have loved to see him forced to resign at least a couple years ago, it's absolutely the republicans and the media who prop him up.
but collectively, as a nation, we've waited until disaster, and may yet wait until an even worse disaster to finally remove him.
ecstatic
(32,701 posts)our country was already finished (or damn close to it).
unblock
(52,208 posts)lame54
(35,287 posts)unblock
(52,208 posts)even if it's well beyond acceptable well prior to hitting bottom.
it's like people have to wait for the disaster to stop or have its big finale before they fix it, rather than stopping the disaster from continuing to do damage before it gets to that point.