Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAnonymous Authority
Just how often does T-Rump use this type of fallacy? He uses it to death, actually, (people are saying...):
Note: A missing referent is when a subject is mentioned, but who or what it refers to is unclear or missing. Often, "they" is used that way, or so they say. The question should be: who are they? or, who has said or is saying that?
Anonymous Authority
Description: When an unspecified source is used as evidence for the claim. This is commonly indicated by phrases such as They say that..., It has been said..., I heard that..., Studies show..., or generalized groups such as, scientists say... When we fail to specify a source of the authority, we cant verify the source, thus the credibility of the argument. Appeals to anonymous sources are more often than not, a way to fabricate, exaggerate, or misrepresent facts in order to deceive others into accepting your claim. At times, this deception is done subconsciously -- it might not always be deliberate.
Logical Form:
Person 1 once heard that X was true.
Therefore, X is true.
Example #1:
You know, they say that if you swallow gum it takes seven years to digest. So whatever you do, dont swallow the gum!
Explanation: They are wrong as they usually are. Gum passes through the system relatively unchanged but does not hang around for 7 years like a college student terrified to get a job. They is a common form of appeal to anonymous authority.
Example #2:
The 13.7 billion-year-old universe is a big conspiracy. I read this article once where these notable scientists found strong evidence that the universe was created 6000 years ago, but because of losing their jobs, they were forced to keep quiet!
Explanation: Without knowing who these scientists are, or the credibility of the source of the article, we cannot verify the evidence; therefore, we should not accept the evidence.
Exception: At times an accepted fact uses the same indicating phrases like the ones used for the fallacy; therefore, if the anonymous authority is actually just a statement of an accepted fact, it should be accepted as evidence.
Climate change is happening -- and always has been. Scientists say the earth is certainly in a warming phase, but there is some debate on the exact causes and certainly more debate on what should be done about it politically.
Tip: Be very wary of they.
Source: https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/18/Anonymous-Authority
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 712 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Anonymous Authority (Original Post)
Newest Reality
Oct 2019
OP
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)1. "Everyone knows" that Trump never lies.
FOX also uses this to convince those who are generally ready to believe.
Newest Reality
(12,712 posts)2. You bet!
It seems to fly right people if they are not AWARE of it.
I would sure like to meet Everyone and find out from the horse's mouth, but Nobody would believe it.